Tight cooperation between Mot1p and NC2β in regulating genome-wide transcription, repression of transcription following heat shock induction and genetic interaction with SAGA

Nucleic Acids Research

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 996-1008

  Spedale, Gianpiero ^a   Meddens, Claartje A ^a   Koster, Maria J E ^a   Ko, Cheuk W ^a   Van Hooff, Sander R ^a   Holstege, Frank C P ^a   Timmers, H Th Marc ^a   Pijnappel, W W M Pim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 26; PROTEIN MOT1P; PROTEIN NC2BETA; RNA POLYMERASE II; TATA BINDING PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR IID; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SAGA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FUNGAL GENE; GENE INTERACTION; GENE MOT1P; GENE NC2BETA; GENE REPRESSION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC REGULATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DEPLETION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; YEAST;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; CELL NUCLEUS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENOME, FUNGAL; HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; HEAT-SHOCK RESPONSE; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; RNA POLYMERASE II; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TATA-BINDING PROTEIN ASSOCIATED FACTORS; TRANS-ACTIVATORS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 84856849294     PISSN: 03051048     EISSN: 13624962     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr784     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Cormack, B. P. and Struhl, K. (1992) The TATA-binding protein is required for transcription by all three nuclear RNA polymerases in yeast cells. Cell, 69, 685-696.
2. Hahn, S. (2004) Structure and mechanism of the RNA polymerase II transcription machinery. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 11, 394-403.
3. Sikorski, T. W. and Buratowski, S. (2009) The basal initiation machinery: beyond the general transcription factors. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 21, 344-351.
4. Basehoar, A. D., Zanton, S. J. and Pugh, B. F. (2004) Identification and distinct regulation of yeast TATA box-containing genes. Cell, 116, 699-709.
5. Lee, T. I., Causton, H. C., Holstege, F. C., Shen, W. C., Hannett, N., Jennings, E. G., Winston, F., Green, M. R. and Young, R. A. (2000) Redundant roles for the TFIID and SAGA complexes in global transcription. Nature, 405, 701-704.
6. Zhang, H., Kruk, J. A. and Reese, J. C. (2008) Dissection of coactivator requirement at RNR3 reveals unexpected contributions from TFIID and SAGA. J. Biol. Chem., 283, 27360-27368.
7. Zanton, S. J. and Pugh, B. F. (2004) Changes in genomewide occupancy of core transcriptional regulators during heat stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 16843-16848.
8. van Werven, F. J., van Teeffelen, H. A., Holstege, F. C. and Timmers, H. T. (2009) Distinct promoter dynamics of the basal transcription factor TBP across the yeast genome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 16, 1043-1048.
9. Poon, D., Campbell, A. M., Bai, Y. and Weil, P. A. (1994) Yeast Taf170 is encoded by MOT1 and exists in a TATA box-binding protein (TBP)-TBP-associated factor complex distinct from transcription factor IID. J. Biol. Chem., 269, 23135-23140.
10. Auble, D. T., Hansen, K. E., Mueller, C. G., Lane, W. S., Thorner, J. and Hahn, S. (1994) Mot1, a global repressor of RNA polymerase II transcription, inhibits TBP binding to DNA by an ATP-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev., 8, 1920-1934.
11. Darst, R. P., Dasgupta, A., Zhu, C., Hsu, J. Y., Vroom, A., Muldrow, T. and Auble, D. T. (2003) Mot1 regulates the DNA binding activity of free TATA-binding protein in an ATP-dependent manner. J. Biol. Chem., 278, 13216-13226.
12. Sprouse, R. O., Brenowitz, M. and Auble, D. T. (2006) Snf2/Swi2-related ATPase Mot1 drives displacement of TATA-binding protein by gripping DNA. EMBO J., 25, 1492-1504.
13. Pereira, L. A., van der Knaap, J. A., van den Boom, V., van den Heuvel, F. A. and Timmers, H. T. (2001) TAF(II)170 interacts with the concave surface of TATA-binding protein to inhibit its DNA binding activity. Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 7523-7534.
14. Gumbs, O. H., Campbell, A. M. and Weil, P. A. (2003) High-affinity DNA binding by a Mot1p-TBP complex: implications for TAF-independent transcription. EMBO J., 22, 3131-3141.
15. Goppelt, A. and Meisterernst, M. (1996) Characterization of the basal inhibitor of class II transcription NC2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res., 24, 4450-4455.
16. Kamada, K., Shu, F., Chen, H., Malik, S., Stelzer, G., Roeder, R. G., Meisterernst, M. and Burley, S. K. (2001) Crystal structure of negative cofactor 2 recognizing the TBP-DNA transcription complex. Cell, 106, 71-81.
17. Goppelt, A., Stelzer, G., Lottspeich, F. and Meisterernst, M. (1996) A mechanism for repression of class II gene transcription through specific binding of NC2 to TBP-promoter complexes via heterodimeric histone fold domains. EMBO J., 15, 3105-3116.
18. Schluesche, P., Stelzer, G., Piaia, E., Lamb, D. C. and Meisterernst, M. (2007) NC2 mobilizes TBP on core promoter TATA boxes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 14, 1196-1201.
19. Dasgupta, A., Juedes, S. A., Sprouse, R. O. and Auble, D. T. (2005) Mot1-mediated control of transcription complex assembly and activity. EMBO J., 24, 1717-1729.
20. Geisberg, J. V., Holstege, F. C., Young, R. A. and Struhl, K. (2001) Yeast NC2 associates with the RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex and selectively affects transcription in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 2736-2742.
21. Geisberg, J. V., Moqtaderi, Z., Kuras, L. and Struhl, K. (2002) Mot1 associates with transcriptionally active promoters and inhibits association of NC2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol., 22, 8122-8134.
22. van Oevelen, C. J., van Teeffelen, H. A. and Timmers, H. T. (2005) Differential requirement of SAGA subunits for Mot1p and Taf1p recruitment in gene activation. Mol. Cell. Biol., 25, 4863-4872.
23. Andrau, J.-C., Van Oevelen, C. J. C., Van Teeffelen, H. A. A. M., Weil, P. A., Holstege, F. C. P. and Timmers, H. T. M. (2002) Mot1p is essential for TBP recruitment to selected promoters during in vivo gene activation. EMBO J., 21, 5173-5183.
24. Cang, Y. and Prelich, G. (2002) Direct stimulation of transcription by negative cofactor 2 (NC2) through TATA-binding protein (TBP). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 12727-12732.
25. Masson, P., Leimgruber, E., Creton, S. and Collart, M. A. (2007) The dual control of TFIIB recruitment by NC2 is gene specific. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, 539-549.
26. van Werven, F. J., van Bakel, H., van Teeffelen, H. A., Altelaar, A. F., Koerkamp, M. G., Heck, A. J., Holstege, F. C. and Timmers, H. T. (2008) Cooperative action of NC2 and Mot1p to regulate TATA-binding protein function across the genome. Genes Dev., 22, 2359-2369.
27. Van Oevelen, C. J. C., Van Teeffelen, H. A. A. M. and Timmers, H. T. M. (2005) Differential requirement of SAGA subunits for Mot1p and Taf1p recruitment in gene activation. Mol. Cell. Biol., 25, 4863-4872.
28. Sprouse, R. O., Karpova, T. S., Mueller, F., Dasgupta, A., McNally, J. G. and Auble, D. T. (2008) Regulation of TATA-binding protein dynamics in living yeast cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 13304-13308.
29. Dasgupta, A., Darst, R. P., Martin, K. J., Afshari, C. A. and Auble, D. T. (2002) Mot1 activates and represses transcription by direct, ATPase-dependent mechanisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 2666-2671.
30. Haruki, H., Nishikawa, J. and Laemmli, U. K. (2008) The anchor-away technique: rapid, conditional establishment of yeast mutant phenotypes. Mol. Cell, 31, 925-932.
31. Spedale, G., Mischerikow, N., Heck, A. J. R., Timmers, H. T. M. and Pijnappel, W. W. M. P. (2010) Identification of Pep4p as the Protease Responsible for Formation of the SAGA-related SLIK Protein Complex. J. Biol. Chem., 285, 22793-22799.
32. Unal, E., Heidinger-Pauli, J. M. and Koshland, D. (2007) DNA double-strand breaks trigger genome-wide sister-chromatid cohesion through Eco1 (Ctf7). Science, 317, 245-248.
33. van Wageningen, S., Kemmeren, P., Lijnzaad, P., Margaritis, T., Benschop, J. J., de Castro, I. J., van Leenen, D., Groot Koerkamp, M. J., Ko, C. W., Miles, A. J. et al. (2010) Functional overlap and regulatory links shape genetic interactions between signaling pathways. Cell, 143, 991-1004.
34. Margaritis, T., Lijnzaad, P., van Leenen, D., Bouwmeester, D., Kemmeren, P., van Hooff, S. R. and Holstege, F. C. (2009) Adaptable gene-specific dye bias correction for two-channel DNA microarrays. Mol. Syst. Biol., 5, 266.
35. van Werven, F. J. and Timmers, H. T. (2006) The use of biotin tagging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves the sensitivity of chromatin immunoprecipitation. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, e33.
36. Ahn, S. H., Keogh, M. C. and Buratowski, S. (2009) Ctk1 promotes dissociation of basal transcription factors from elongating RNA polymerase II. EMBO J., 28, 205-212.
37. Lenstra, T. L., Benschop, J. J., Kim, T., Schulze, J. M., Brabers, N. A., Margaritis, T., van de Pasch, L. A., van Heesch, S. A., Brok, M. O., Groot Koerkamp, M. J. et al. (2011) The specificity and topology of chromatin interaction pathways in yeast. Mol. Cell, 42, 536-549.
38. Madison, J. M. and Winston, F. (1997) Evidence that Spt3 functionally interacts with Mot1, TFIIA, and TATA-binding protein to confer promoter-specific transcriptional control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol., 17, 287-295.
39. Ghaemmaghami, S., Huh, W. K., Bower, K., Howson, R. W., Belle, A., Dephoure, N., O'Shea, E. K. and Weissman, J. S. (2003) Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature, 425, 737-741.
40. Wente, S. R. and Rout, M. P. (2010) The nuclear pore complex and nuclear transport. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 2, a000562.
41. Basehoar, A. D., Zanton, S. J. and Pugh, B. F. (2004) Identification and distinct regulation of yeast TATA box-containing genes. Cell, 116, 699-709.
42. Geisberg, J. V. and Struhl, K. (2004) Cellular stress alters the transcriptional properties of promoter-bound Mot1-TBP complexes. Mol. Cell, 14, 479-489.
43. Hsu, J. Y., Juven-Gershon, T., Marr, M. T. 2nd, Wright, K. J., Tjian, R. and Kadonaga, J. T. (2008) TBP, Mot1, and NC2 establish a regulatory circuit that controls DPE-dependent versus TATA-dependent transcription. Genes Dev., 22, 2353-2358.
44. Mohibullah, N. and Hahn, S. (2008) Site-specific cross-linking of TBP in vivo and in vitro reveals a direct functional interaction with the SAGA subunit Spt3. Genes Dev., 22, 2994-3006.
45. van Oevelen, C. J., van Teeffelen, H. A., van Werven, F. J. and Timmers, H. T. (2006) Snf1p-dependent Spt-Ada-Gcn5-acetyltransferase (SAGA) recruitment and chromatin remodeling activities on the HXT2 and HXT4 promoters. J. Biol. Chem., 281, 4523-4531.
46. Belotserkovskaya, R., Sterner, D. E., Deng, M., Sayre, M. H., Lieberman, P. M. and Berger, S. L. (2000) Inhibition of TATA-binding protein function by SAGA subunits Spt3 and Spt8 at Gcn4-activated promoters. Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 634-647.
47. Bonnet, J., Wang, Y.-H., Spedale, G., Atkinson, R. A., Romier, C., Hamiche, A., Pijnappel, W. W. M. P., Timmers, H. T. M., Tora, L., Devys, D. et al. (2010) The structural plasticity of SCA7 domains defines their differential nucleosome-binding properties. EMBO Rep., 11, 612-618.
48. Henry, K. W. (2003) Transcriptional activation via sequential histone H2B ubiquitylation and deubiquitylation, mediated by SAGA-associated Ubp8. Genes Dev., 17, 2648-2663.
49. Holstege, F. C., Jennings, E. G., Wyrick, J. J., Lee, T. I., Hengartner, C. J., Green, M. R., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S. and Young, R. A. (1998) Dissecting the regulatory circuitry of a eukaryoticgenome. Cell, 95, 717728.