The mere exposure effect in the domain of haptics

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Jakesch, Martina ^a,b   Carbon, Claus Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MATERIALS; NORMAL HUMAN; OBJECT RELATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STONE; TACTILE STIMULATION; TOUCH; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL STIMULATION; WOOD; CONDITIONING; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REPETITION PRIMING;

COGNITION; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REPETITION PRIMING; TOUCH; WOOD;

EID: 84856711764     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031215     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Schaal B, Marlier L, Soussignan R, (2000) Human foetuses learn odours from their pregnant mother's diet. Chemical Senses 25: 729-737.
2. Titchener EB, (1910) A textbook of psychology New York Macmillan.
3. Zajonc RB, (1968) Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9: 1-27.
4. Fechner TG, (1871) Vorschule der Ästhetik Teil 1 [preschool of aesthetic part 1] Leipzig Breitkopf and Härtel.
5. Bornstein RF, (1989) Exposure and affect- Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin 106: 265-289.
6. Heingart A, Hall JV, (1974) Affective consequences in adults and children of repeated exposure to auditory-stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 29: 719-723.
7. Heyduk RG, (1975) Rated preference for musical compositions as it relates to complexity and exposure frequency. Perception & Psychophysics 17: 84-91.
8. Lieberman LR, Walters WM, (1968) Effects of repeated listening on connotative meaning of serious music. Perceptual and Motor Skills 26: 891-895.
9. Szpunar KK, Schellenberg EG, Pliner P, (2004) Liking and memory for musical stimuli as a function of exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 30: 370-381.
10. Tan SL, Spackman MP, Peaslee CL, (2006) The effects of repeated exposure on liking and judgments of musical unity of intact and patchwork compositions. Music Perception 23: 407-421.
11. Thompson WF, Balkwill LL, Vernescu R, (2000) Expectancies generated by recent exposure to melodic sequences. Memory & Cognition 28: 547-555.
12. Witvliet CVO, Vrana SR, (2007) Play it again Sam: Repeated exposure to emotionally evocative music polarises liking and smiling responses, and influences other affective reports, facial EMG, and heart rate. Cognition & Emotion 21: 3-25.
13. Balogh RD, Porter RH, (1986) Olfactory preferences resulting from mere exposure in human neonates. Infant Behavior & Development 9: 395-401.
14. Prescott J, Kim H, Kim KO, (2008) Cognitive mediation of hedonic changes to odors following exposure. Chemosensory Perception 1: 2-8.
15. Suzuki M, Gyoba J, (2008) Visual and tactile cross-modal mere exposure effects. Cognition & Emotion 22: 147-154.
16. Zajonc RB, VanKreveld D, Tavris C, Shaver P, (1972) Exposure, satiation, and stimulus discriminability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21: 270-280.
17. Berlyne DE, (1970) Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics 8: 279-286.
18. Phillips F, Egan EJL, Perry BN, (2009) Perceptual equivalence between vision and touch is complexity dependent. Acta Psychologica 132: 259-266.
19. Berlyne DE, (1971) Aesthetics and psychobiology New York Meredith Corporation.
20. Berlyne DE, (1974) Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps towards an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation Washington D. C. Hemisphere publishing corporation.
21. Stang DJ, (1973) Theories of novelty and affect- Empirical evaluation. European Journal of Social Psychology 3: 351-351.
22. Stang DJ, (1974) Methodological factors in Mere Exposure research. Psychological Bulletin 81: 1014-1025.
23. Stang DJ, (1974) Intuition as artifact in Mere Exposure studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30: 647-653.
24. Stang DJ, (1975) Effects of Mere Exposure on learning and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31: 7-12.
25. Gordon PC, Holyoak KJ, (1983) Implicit learning and generalization of the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45: 492-500.
26. Bornstein RF, D'Agostino PR, (1994) The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency- Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition 12: 103-128.
27. Fang X, Singh S, Ahluwalia R, (2007) An examination of different explanations for the mere exposure effect. Journal of Consumer Research 34: 97-103.
28. Winkielman P, Cacioppo JT, (2001) Mind at ease puts a smile on the face. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (6): 989-1000.
29. Oppenheimer DM, (2008) The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12: 237-241.
30. Ballesteros S, Reales JM, Manga D, (1999) Implicit and explicit memory for familiar and novel objects presented to touch. Psicothema 11: 785-800.
31. Tulving E, Schacter DL, (1990) Priming and human-memory systems. Science 247: 301-306.
32. Kunst-Wilson WR, Zajonc RB, (1980) Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science 207: 557-558.
33. Lee AY, (2001) The mere exposure effect: An uncertainty reduction explanation revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27: 1255-1266.
34. Alais D, Burr D, (2004) The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Current Biology 14: 257-262.
35. Oruç I, Maloney LT, Landy MS, (2003) Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error. Vision Research 43: 2451-2468.
36. Gepshtein S, Banks MS, (2003) Viewing geometry determines how vision and haptics combine in size perception. Current Biology 13: 483-488.
37. Peck J, Childers TL, (2003) Individual differences in haptic information processing: The "Need for Touch" scale. Journal of Consumer Research 30: 430-442.
38. Whittlesea BWA, Price JR, (2001) Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect. Memory & Cognition 29: 234-246.
39. Seamon JG, GanorStern D, Crowley MJ, Wilson SM, Weber WJ, et al. (1997) A mere exposure effect for transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of reflection, size, or color changes on affect and recognition. Memory & Cognition 25: 367-374.
40. Carbon CC, Hutzler F, Minge M, (2006) Innovation in design investigated by eye movements and pupillometry. Psychology Science 48: 173-186.
41. Carbon CC, Leder H, (2005) The repeated evaluation technique (RET). A method to capture dynamic effects of innovativeness and attractiveness. Applied Cognitive Psychology 19: 587-601.
42. Carbon CC, Michael L, Leder H, (2008) Design evaluation by combination of repeated evaluation technique and measurement of electrodermal activity. Research in Engineering Design 19: 143-149.
43. Faerber SJ, Leder H, Gerger G, Carbon CC, (2010) Priming semantic concepts affects the dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. Acta Psychologica 135: 191-200.
44. Gerger G, Leder H, Faerber SJ, Carbon CC, (2011) When the others matter: Context-dependent effects on changes in appreciation of innovativeness. Swiss Journal of Psychology 70: 75-83.
45. Bornstein RF, Kale AR, Cornell KR, (1990) Boredom as a limiting condition on the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58: 791-800.
46. Cox D, Cox AD, (2002) Beyond first impressions: The effects of repeated exposure on consumer liking of visually complex and simple product designs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 30: 119-130.47.
47. Peck J, Childers TL, (2006) If I touch it I have to have it: Individual and environmental influences on impulse purchasing. Journal of Business Research 59: 765-769.
48. Peck J, Johnson JW, (2011) Autotelic Need for Touch, haptics, and persuasion: The role of involvement. Psychology & Marketing 28: 222-239.
49. Kruglanski AW, Freund T, Bar-Tal D, (1996) Motivational effects in the mere-exposure paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology 26: 479-499.
50. Hansen T, Bartsch RA, (2001) The positive correlation between personal need for structure and the mere exposure effect. Social Behavior and Personality 29: 271-276.