The effects of repeated exposure on liking and judgments of musical unity of intact and patchwork compositions

Music Perception

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 407-421

  Tan, Siu Lan ^a   Spackman, Matthew P ^a   Peaslee, Christy L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847762815     PISSN: 07307829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/mp.2006.23.5.407     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Aiello, R. (1994). Can music be experimentally studied? In R. Aiello (Ed.), Musical perceptions (pp. 273-282). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Beardsley, M. C. (1966). Aesthetics from Classical Greece to the present. New York: Macmillan.
3. Bent, I. (1994). Music analysis in the nineteenth century: Vol. 1. Fugue, form, and style. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
4. Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
5. Berlyne, D. E. (1972a). Ends and means of experimental aesthetics. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 26, 303-325.
6. Berlyne, D. E. (1972b). Uniformity in variety: Extension to three-element visual patterns and to non-verbal measures. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 26, 277-291.
7. Berlyne, D. E. (1974). The new experimental aesthetics. In D. E. Berlyne (Ed.), Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps towards an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation (pp. 1-25). New York: Halsted.
8. Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289.
9. Bradley, I. L. (1971). Repetition as a factor in the development of musical preferences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 19, 295-298.
10. Brentar, J. E., Neuendorf, K. A., & Armstrong, G. B. (1994). Exposure effects and affective responses to music. Communication Monographs, 61, 161-181.
11. Clarke, E. F., & Krumhansl, C. L. (1990). Perceiving musical time. Music Perception, 7, 213-251.
12. Colman, A. M., Best, W. M., & Austen, A. J. (1986). Familiarity and liking: Direct tests of the preference-feedback hypothesis. Psychological Reports, 58, 931-938.
13. Cook, N. (1990). Music, imagination, and culture. Oxford: Clarendon.
14. Crandall, J. E., Montgomery, V. E., & Rees, W. W. (1973). "Mere" exposure versus familiarity, with implications for response competition and expectancy arousal hypotheses. Journal of General Psychology, 88, 105-120.
15. Dowling, W. J. (1972). Recognition of melodic transformations: Inversion, retrograde, and retrograde inversion. Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 417-421.
16. Dunsby, J. (2002). Thematic and motivic analysis. In T. Christensen (Ed.), The Cambridge history of Western music theory (pp. 907-926). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Epstein, D. (1979). Beyond Orpheus: Studies in musical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Fechner, G. T. (1876). Vorschule der Ästhetik, I [Introduction to aesthetics]. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.
19. Francès, R. (1988). The perception of music (W. J. Dowling, Trans.). London: Lawrence Erlbaum. (Original work published 1958)
20. Gotlieb, H., & Koneçni, V. J. (1985). The effects of instrumentation, playing style, and structure in the Goldberg Variations of Johann Sebastian Bach. Music Perception, 3, 87-102.
21. Halpern, A. R. (1984). Perception of structure in novel music. Memory and Cognition, 12, 163-170.
22. Hargreaves, D. J. (1984). The effects of repetition on liking for music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 35-47.
23. Heingartner, A., & Hall, J. V. (1974). Affective consequences in adults and children of repeated exposure to auditory stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 719-723.
24. Heyduk, R. G. (1975). Rated preference for musical composition as it relates to complexity and exposure frequency. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 84-90.
25. Higgins, K. M. (1991). The music of our lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
26. Hutcheson, F. (1973). Francis Hutcheson: An inquiry concerning beauty, order, harmony, design (P. Kivy, Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff (Original work published 1725)
27. Jakobovits, L. A. (1966). Studies of fads: I. The "hit parade." Psychological Reports, 18, 443-450.
28. Karno, M., & Koneçni, V. J. (1992). The effects of structural interventions in the first movement of Mozart's Symphony in G Minor K. 550 on aesthetic preference. Music Perception, 10, 63-72.
29. Koneçni, V. J. (1984). Elusive effects of artists' "messages." In W. R. Crozier & A. J. Chapman (Eds.), Cognitive processes in the perception of art (pp. 71-93). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
30. Koneçni, V. J. (1996). Daniel E. Berlyne (1924-1976): Two decades later. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 14, 129-142.
31. Krugman, H. E. (1943). Affective response to music as a function of familiarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 388-392.
32. Krumhansl, C. L. (1996). A perceptual analysis of Mozart's Piano Sonata K. 282: Segmentation, tension, and musical ideas. Music Perception, 13, 401-432.
33. Lalitte, P., Bigand, E., Poulin-Charronnat, B., McAdams, S., Delbé, C., & D'Adamo, D. (2004). The perceptual structure of thematic materials in "The Angel of Death." Music Perception, 22, 265-296.
34. Lamont, A., & Dibben, N. (2001). Motivic structure and the perception of similarity. Music Perception, 18, 245-274.
35. Levinson, J. (1997). Music in the moment. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
36. Lieberman, L. R., & Walters, W. M., Jr. (1968). Effects of repeated listening on connotative meaning of serious music. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 26, 891-895.
37. Martindale, C. (1984). Cognition, psychobiology, and aesthetics. In F. Farley & R. Neperud (Eds.), The foundation of aesthetics, art, and art education (pp. 7-42). New York: Praeger.
38. Maus, F. E. (1999). Concepts of musical unity. In N. Cook & M. Everist (Eds.), Rethinking music (pp. 171-192). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. Meyer, L. B. (1989). Style and music. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
40. Muli, H. K. (1957). The effect of repetition upon the enjoyment of modern music. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 43, 155-162.
41. North, A. C., & Hargreaves, D. J. (1997). Liking, arousal potential, and the emotions expressed by music. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38, 45-53.
42. Orr, M. G., & Oilsson, S. (2005). Relationship between complexity and liking as a function of expertise. Music Perception, 22, 583-611.
43. Peretz, L, Gaudreau, D., & Bonnel, A-M. (1998). Exposure effects on music preference and recognition. Memory and Cognition, 26, 884-902.
44. Pollard-Gott, L. (1983). Emergence of thematic concepts in repeated listening to music. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 66-94.
45. Poulin-Charronnat, B., Bigand, E., Lalitte, P., Madurell, F., Vieillard, S., & McAdams, S. (2004). Effects of a change in instrumentation on the recognition of musical materials. Music Perception, 22, 239-263.
46. Réti, R. (1951). The thematic process in music. New York: Da Capo.
47. Rosen, C. (1972). The Classical style: Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven. New York: W. W. Norton.
48. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 345-356.
49. Schenker, H. (1979). Free composition (E. Oster, Ed. & Trans.). New York: Longman. (Original work published 1935)
50. Smith, K. C., & Cuddy, L. L. (1986). The pleasingness of melodic sequences: Contrasting effects of repetition and rule-familiarity. Psychology of Music, 14, 17-32.
51. Stevens, C., & Latimer, C. (1991). Judgments of complexity and pleasingness in music: The effect of structure, repetition, and training. Australian Journal of Psychology. 43, 17-22.
52. Szpunar, K. K., Schellenberg, E. G., & Pliner, P. (2004). Liking and memory for musical stimuli as a function of exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 370-381.
53. Tan, S. L., & Kelly, M. E. (2004). Graphic representations of short musical compositions. Psychology of Music, 32, 191-212.
54. Tan, S. L., & Spackman, M. P. (2005). Listeners' judgments of the musical unity of structurally altered and intact musical compositions. Psychology of Music, 33, 133-153.
55. Tillmann, B., & Bigand, E. (1996). Does formal structure affect perception of musical expressiveness? Psychology of Music, 24, 3-16.
56. Tillmann, B., & Bigand, E. (1998). Influence of global structure on musical target detection and recognition. International Journal of Psychology, 33, 107-122.
57. Verveer, E. M., Barry, H., Jr., & Bousfield, W. A. (1933). Change in affectivity with repetition. American Journal of Psychology, 45, 130-134.
58. Walker, E. L. (1973). Psychological complexity and preference: A hedgehog theory of behavior. In D. E. Berlyne & K. B. Madsen (Eds.), Pleasure, reward, and preference: Their nature, determinants, and role in behavior (pp. 65-97). New York: Academic Press.
59. Wilson, W. R. (1979). Feeling more than we can know: Exposure effects without learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 811-821.
60. Wundt, W. M. (1874). Grundzüge derphysiologischen Psychologie [Introduction to the study of physiological psychology]. Leipzig: Engelmann.
61. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monographs, 9, 1-27.
62. Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224-228.