A mere exposure effect for transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of reflection, size, or color changes on affect and recognition

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 367-374

  Seamon, John G ^a   Ganor Stern, Donna ^a   Crowley, Michael J ^a   Wilson, Sarah M ^a   Weber, Wendy J ^a   O'Rourke, Corinne M ^a   Mahoney, Joseph K ^a  

^a WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; ARTICLE; COLOR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; RECOGNITION; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; VISUAL MEMORY;

EID: 0030924856     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03211292     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. BIEDERMAN, I., & COOPER, E. E. (1991). Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception, 20, 585-593.
2. BIEDERMAN, I., & COOPER, E. E. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 121-133.
3. BIEDERMAN, I., & GERHARDSTEIN, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence for 3D viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
4. BIEDERMAN, I., & JU, G. (1988). Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 38-64.
5. BONANNO, G. A., & STILLINGS, N. A. (1986). Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes. American Journal of Psychology, 99, 403-415.
6. BORNSTEIN, R. F. (1992). Subliminal mere exposure effects. In R. F. Bornstein & T. S. Pittman (Eds.), Perception without awareness: Cognitive, clinical and social perspectives (pp. 191-210). New York: Guilford.
7. BORNSTEIN, R. F., & D'AGOSTINO, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 63, 545-552.
8. BORNSTEIN, R. F., LEONE, D. R., & GALLEY, D. J. (1987). The generalizability of subliminal mere exposure effects. Influence of stimuli perceived without awareness on social behavior. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 53, 1070-1079.
9. CARRASCO, M., & SEAMON, J. G. (1996). Priming impossible figures in the object decision test: The critical importance of perceived stimulus complexity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 344-351.
10. CAVE, C. B., BOST, P. R., & COBB, R. E. (1996). Effects of color and pattern on implicit and explicit picture memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 639-653.
11. CAVE, C. B., & SQUIRE, L. R. (1992). Intact and long lasting priming in amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 509-520.
12. COOPER, L. A., SCHACTER, D. L., BALLESTEROS, S., & MOORE, C. (1992). Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of size and reflection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 43-57.
13. CORBALLIS, M. C. (1988). Recognition of disoriented shapes. Psychological Review, 95, 115-123.
14. GRAF, P. (1994). Explicit and implicit memory: A decade of research. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 681-696). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. JACOBY, L. L., & DALLAS, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.
16. JACOBY, L. L., TOTH, J. P., & YONELINAS, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139-154.
17. JOLICOEUR, P. (1987). A size-congruency effect in memory for visual shape. Memory & Cognition, 15, 531-543.
18. KOLERS, P. A., DUCHNICKY, R. L., & SUNDSTROEM, G. (1985). Size in visual processing of faces and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 726-751.
19. KUNST-WILSON, W. R., & ZAJONC, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557-558.
20. MANDLER, G., NAKAMURA, Y., & VAN ZANDT, B. J. (1987). Nonspecific effects of exposure to stimuli that cannot be recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 646-648.
21. MILLIKEN, B., & JOLICOEUR, P. (1992). Size effects in visual recognition memory are determined by perceived size. Memory & Cognition, 20, 83-95.
22. MOSCOVITCH, M., GOSHEN-GOTTSTEIN, Y., & VRIEZEN, E. (1994). Memory without conscious recollection: A tutorial review from a neuropsychological perspective. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 619-660). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. MURPHY, S. T., MONAHAN, J. L., & ZAJONC, R. B. (1995). Additivity of nonconscious priming: Combined effects of priming and exposure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 69, 589-602.
24. OSTERGAARD, A. L., & DAVIDOFF, J. B. (1985). Some effects of color on naming and recognition of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 579-587.
25. PRICE, C. J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1989). The effects of surface detail on object categorization and naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 797-827.
26. RICHARDSON-KLAVEHN, A., & BJORK, R. A. (1988). Measures of memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 475-543.
27. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & BLAXTON, T. A. (1987). Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in word-fragment completion. Memory & Cognition, 15, 379-388.
28. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & MCDERMOTT, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63-131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
29. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & SRINIVAS, K. (1993). Specificity of operations in perceptual priming. In P. Graf & M. E. J. Masson (Eds.), Implicit memory: New directions in cognition, development, and neuropsychology (pp. 17-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. SCHACTER, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 501-518.
31. SCHACTER, D. L., BOWERS, J., & BOOKER, J. (1989). Intentional awareness and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion. In S. Lewandowsky, J. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.), Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 47-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. SCHACTER, D. L., & CHURCH, B. A. (1992). Auditory priming: Implicit and explicit memory for words and voices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 915-930.
33. SCHACTER, D. L., COOPER, L. A., & DELANEY, S. M. (1990). Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 5-24.
34. SCHACTER, D. L., COOPER, L. A., DELANEY, S. M., PETERSON, M. A., & THARAN, M. (1991). Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: Constraints on the construction of structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 3-19.
35. SCHACTER, D. L., COOPER, L. A., & TREADWELL, J. (1993). Preserved priming of novel objects across size transformations in amnesic patients. Psychological Science, 4, 331-335.
36. SEAMON, J. G., BRODY, N., & KAUFF, D. M. (1983a). Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: Effects of shadowing, masking, and cerebral laterally. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 544-555.
37. SEAMON, J. G., BRODY, N., & KAUFF, D. M. (1983b). Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: II. Effect of delay between study and text. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 187-189.
38. SEAMON, J. G., GANOR-STERN, D., CROWLEY, M. J., WILSON, S. M., WEBER, W. J., O'ROURKE, C.M., & MAHONEY, J. K. (1994, November). Mere exposure for transformed three-dimensional objects. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis.
39. SEAMON, J. G., MARSH, R. L., & BRODY, N. (1984). Critical importance of exposure duration for affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 465-469.
40. SEAMON, J. G., WILLIAMS, P. C., CROWLEY, M. J., KIM, I. J., LANGER, S. A., ORNE, P. J., & WISHENGRAD, D. L. (1995). The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 711-721.
41. SNODGRASS, J. G., & VANDERWART, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 6, 174-215.
42. SQUIRE, L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus. A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychological Review, 99, 195-231.
43. SRINIVAS, K. (1993). Perceptual specificity in nonverbal priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 19, 582-602.
44. SRINIVAS, K. (1995). The representation of rotated objects in explicit and implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1019-1036.
45. TARR, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study of the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 55-82.
46. WELDON, M. S. (1991). Mechanisms underlying priming on perceptual tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 526-541.
47. WURM, L. H., LEGGE, G. E., ISENBERG, L. M., & LUEBKER, A. (1993). Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 899-911.
48. ZAJONC, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology Monograph Supplements, 9(2, Pt. 2), 1-27.
49. ZAJONC, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.