Study of surplus cost of robotic assistance for radical hysterectomy, versus laparotomy and standard laparoscopy;Étude du surcoût de la cœlioscopie assistée par robot dans l'hystérectomie élargie

Gynecologie Obstetrique et Fertilite

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 77-83

  Dennis, T ^a   De Mendona, C ^a   Phalippou, J ^b   Collinet, P ^a   Boulanger, L ^a   Weingertner, F ^a   Leblanc, E ^b   Narducci, F ^b  

^a LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Oscar Lambret   (France)

Author keywords

Cost comparison; Da Vinci; Gynaecology; Laparoscopy; Robotic assistance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COST; COST CONTROL; ECONOMIC ASPECT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; ROBOTICS; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

EID: 84856702171     PISSN: 12979589     EISSN: 17696682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Cancer, Ind, Rapport de la commission d'orientation des cancers ; 2003. p. 37.
2. D. Querleu, and C.P. Morrow Classification of radical hysterectomy Lancet Oncol 9 3 2008 297 303 (Pubitemid 351722949)
3. D. Querleu, J.M. Childers, and D. Dargent Laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology 1999 Blackwell Sci Oxford
4. J.P. Geisler Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy compared with open radical hysterectomy Int J Gynecol Cancer 20 3 2010 438 442
5. L.A. Cantrell Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer : a 3-year experience Gynecol Oncol 117 2 2010 260 265
6. K. Zakashansky Recent advances in the surgical management of cervical cancer Mt Sinai J Med 76 6 2009 567 576
7. A. Maggioni Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case control study Gynecol Oncol 115 1 2009 60 64
8. R. Estape A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy Gynecol Oncol 113 3 2009 357 361
9. M.P. Lowe A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer Gynecol Oncol 113 2 2009 191 194
10. J.F. Magrina, R. Kho, and P.M. Magtibay Robotic radical hysterectomy: technical aspects Gynecol Oncol 113 1 2009 28 31
11. E.M. Ko Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution Gynecol Oncol 111 3 2008 425 430
12. J.F. Boggess A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy Am J Obstet Gynecol 199 4 2008 357e1 357e7
13. B. Sert, and V. Abeler Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? Int J Med Robot 3 3 2007 224 228 (Pubitemid 350033311)
14. F.R. Nezhat Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer JSLS 12 3 2008 227 237
15. F. Marchal Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign and oncologic pathologies: initial clinical experience with 30 patients Surg Endosc 19 6 2005 826 831 (Pubitemid 41215987)
16. Y.T. Kim Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study Gynecol Oncol 108 2 2008 312 316 (Pubitemid 351174289)
17. J. Fanning, B. Fenton, and M. Purohit Robotic radical hysterectomy Am J Obstet Gynecol 198 6 2008 649e1 649e4
18. J.F. Magrina Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy Gynecol Oncol 109 1 2008 86 91
19. Z. Liang Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with fascia space dissection technique for cervical cancer: description of technique and outcomes Gynecol Oncol 119 2 2010 202 207
20. D. Querleu Modified radical vaginal hysterectomy with or without laparoscopic nerve-sparing dissection: a comparative study Gynecol Oncol 85 1 2002 154 158 (Pubitemid 34304026)
21. E. Leblanc, and How I perform. vaginal preparation for a laparoscopic radical hysterectomy or the "Schautheim" procedure Gynecol Obstet Fertil 35 3 2007 263 264 (Pubitemid 46386484)
22. A.P. Advincula Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14 6 2007 698 705 (Pubitemid 350008145)
23. J.C. Barnett Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer Obstet Gynecol 116 3 2010 685 693
24. C. Bolenz Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer Eur Urol 57 3 2010 453 458
25. S.P. Dharia Patel Robotic tubal anastomosis: surgical technique and cost effectiveness Fertil Steril 90 4 2008 1175 1179
26. D.O. Holtz Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17 4 2010 500 503
27. J.P. Judd Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17 4 2010 493 499
28. R.P. Pasic Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.06.009 [PII: S1553-4650(10)00336-5]
29. M. Patel, D. O'Sullivan, and P.K. Tulikangas A comparison of costs for abdominal, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted sacral colpopexy Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20 2 2009 223 228
30. D. Sarlos Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 150 1 2010 92 96
31. S. Breitenstein Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study Ann Surg 247 6 2008 987 993 (Pubitemid 351770419)
32. J. Heemskerk Robot-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time Dis Colon Rectum 50 11 2007 1825 1830 (Pubitemid 350077096)
33. J. Heemskerk Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17 1 2007 1 4 (Pubitemid 46941074)
34. Y. Lotan Economics of robotics in urology Curr Opin Urol 20 1 2010 92 97
35. Y. Lotan, J.A. Cadeddu, and M.T. Gettman The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques J Urol 172 4 Pt 1 2004 1431 1435 (Pubitemid 39249737)
36. J.A. Morgan Does robotic technology make minimally invasive cardiac surgery too expensive? A hospital cost analysis of robotic and conventional techniques J Card Surg 20 3 2005 246 251 (Pubitemid 40675670)
37. I.E. Nakadi Evaluation of da Vinci Nissen fundoplication clinical results and cost minimization World J Surg 30 6 2006 1050 1054 (Pubitemid 43824418)
38. C.D. Scales Jr. Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy J Urol 174 6 2005 2323 2329 (Pubitemid 41611814)
39. M.C. Bell Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques Gynecol Oncol 111 3 2008 407 411
40. G.I. Barbash, and S.A. Glied New technology and health care costs - the case of robot-assisted surgery N Engl J Med 363 8 2010 701 704