Recent advances in the surgical management of cervical cancer

Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine

Volumn 76, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 567-576

  Zakashansky, Konstantin ^a   Bradley, William H ^a,b   Chuang, Linus ^a   Rahaman, Jamal ^a   Dottino, Peter ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Laparoscopy; Radical hysterectomy; Robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; CANCER SURGERY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SAFETY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TUMOR VOLUME; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;

FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; LAPAROSCOPY; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; ROBOTICS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 73349132009     PISSN: 00272507     EISSN: 19317581     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/msj.20149     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59: 225-249.
2. Schauta F. Die operation des gebaermutterkrebs mittel des schuchardtschen paravaginalschnittes. Monatsschr Geburtshiffe Gynaekol 1902; 15: 133-152.
3. Wertheim E. The extended abdominal operation for carcinoma uteri. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1912; 6: 169-232.
4. Meigs J. The Wertheim operation for carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1945; 40: 542-543.
5. Mitra S. Extraperitoneal lymphadenectomy and radical vaginal hysterectomy for cancer of the cervix (Mitra technique). Am J Obstet Gynecol 1959; 78: 191-196.
6. Marchiole P, Benchaib M, Buenerd A, et al. Oncological safety of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy (LARVT or Dargent's operation): a comparative study with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy (LARVH). Gynecol Oncol 2007; 106: 132-141.
7. Nezhat CR, Burrell MO, Nezhat FR, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 864-865.
8. Nezhat C. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic lymph node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 1644.
9. Canis M, Mage G, Wattiez A, et al. Does endoscopic surgery have a role in radical surgery of cancer of the cervix uteri? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1990; 19: 921.
10. Zakashansky K, Chuang L, Gretz H, et al. A case-controlled study of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in a fellowship training program. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007; 17: 1075-1082.
11. Berguer R. Surgery and ergonomics. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 1011-1016.
12. Dakin GF, Gagner M. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 574-579.
13. US Census Bureau. Fertility of American Women: June 2004. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/p20-555.pdf.
14. Dargent D, Martin X, Sacchetoni A, Mathevet P. Laparoscopic vaginal radical trachelectomy: a treatment to preserve the fertility of cervical carcinoma patients. Cancer 2000; 88: 1877-1882.
15. Zullo MA, Manci N, Angioli R, et al. Vesical dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a critical review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2003; 48: 287-293.
16. Axelsen SM, Petersen LK. Urogynaecological dysfunction after radical hysterectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006; 32: 445-449.
17. Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, et al. Radical hysterectomy: an anatomic evaluation of parametrial dissection. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 77: 155-163.
18. Barton DP, Butler-Manuel SA, Buttery LD, et al. A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2002; 12: 319-321; author reply 321.
19. Jackson KS, Naik R. Pelvic floor dysfunction and radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006; 16: 354-363.
20. Charoenkwan K, Srisomboon J, Suprasert P, et al. Nerve-sparing class III radical hysterectomy: a modified technique to spare the pelvic autonomic nerves without compromising radicality. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006; 16: 1705-1712.
21. Trimbos JB, Maas CP, Deruiter MC, et al. A nervesparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2001; 11: 180-186.
22. Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, et al. A new proposal for radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 1996; 62: 370-378.
23. Covens A, Rosen B, Murphy J, et al. How important is removal of the parametrium at surgery for carcinoma of the cervix? Gynecol Oncol 2002; 84: 145-149.
24. Dottino PS, Segna RA, Zakashansky K, et al. A case controlled study of radical vaginal hysterectomy with laparoscopic lymphadenectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 101: 18.
25. Abu-Rustum NR, Gemignani ML, Moore K, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argon-beam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 91: 402-409.
26. Coruasic A, Barisic D, Plavec A, et al. Laporovaginal surgery in cervical cancer: a Croatian experience. Coll Antropol 2007; 31(suppl 2): 147-154.
27. Frumovitz M, dos Reis R, Sun CC, et al. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 96-102.
28. Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Ciravolo G, et al. Surgicopathologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 106: 502-506.
29. Gil-Moreno A, Diaz-Feijoo B, Roca I, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with intraoperative sentinel node identification in patients with early invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 96: 187-193.
30. Jackson KS, Das N, Naik R, et al. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 95: 655-661.
31. Lee CL, Huang KG. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using Lee-Huang portal and McCartney transvaginal tube. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2002; 9: 536-540.
32. Lee CL, Huang KG, Jain S, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and conventional surgery in the treatment of early cervical cancer. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2002; 9: 481-487.
33. Lee CL, Huang KG, Wang CJ, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 105: 620-624.
34. Li G, Yan X, Shang H, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 105: 176-180.
35. Malur S, Possover M, Schneider A. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal versus radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 289-292.
36. Malzoni M, Malzoni C, Perone C, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2004; 25: 525-527.
37. Nezhat F, Mahdavi A, Nagarsheth NP. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using harmonic shears. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006; 13: 20-25.
38. Obermair A, Ginbey P, McCartney AJ. Feasibility and safety of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003; 10: 345-349.
39. Patsner B. Radical abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for stage IB cervical cancer: what's the point? Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2000; 21: 466-468.
40. Pomel C, Atallah D, Le Bouedec G, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer: 8-year experience of a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 91: 534-539.
41. Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Ballon SC. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 340-348.
42. Steed H, Rosen B, Murphy J, et al. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 93: 588-593.
43. Xu H, Chen Y, Li Y, et al. Complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer: experience based on 317 procedures. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 960-964.
44. Morgan DJ, Hunter DC, McCracken G, et al. Is laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma safe? A case control study with follow up. BJOG 2007; 114: 537-542.
45. Gil-Moreno A, Puig O, Perez-Benavente MA, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005; 12: 113-120.
46. Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2003; 170: 1738-1741.
47. Sert BM, Abeler VM. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection-case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2006; 27: 531-533.
48. Sert B, Abeler V. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? Int J Med Robot 2007; 3: 224-228.
49. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 357e1-357e7.
50. Ko EM, Muto MG, Berkowitz RS, Feltmate CM. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111: 425-430.
51. Nezhat FR, Datta MS, Liu C, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS 2008; 12: 227-237.
52. Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 109: 86-91.
53. Burgess SV, Atug F, Castle EP, et al. Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy. J Endourol 2006; 20: 827-830.
54. Abu-Rustum NR, Neubauer N, Sonoda Y, et al. Surgical and pathologic outcomes of fertility-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy for FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111: 261-264.
55. Dargent D, Mathevet P. Schauta's vaginal hysterectomy combined with laparoscopic lymphadenectomy. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 9: 691-705.
56. Ramirez PT, Schmeler KM, Soliman PT, Frumovitz M. Fertility preservation in patients with early cervical cancer: radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 110(suppl 2): S25-S28.
57. Hertel H, Kohler C, Grund D, et al. Radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT) combined with laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy: prospective multicenter study of 100 patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 103: 506-511.
58. Einstein MH, Park KJ, Sonoda Y, et al. Radical vaginal versus abdominal trachelectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer: a comparison of surgical and pathologic outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 112: 73-77.
59. Chuang LT, Lerner DL, Liu CS, Nezhat FR. Fertilitysparing robotic-assisted radical trachelectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008; 15: 767-770.
60. Dornhofer N, Hockel M. New developments in the surgical therapy of cervical carcinoma. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008; 1138: 233-252.
61. Rob L, Charvat M, Robova H, et al. Less radical fertility-sparing surgery than radical trachelectomy in early cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007; 17: 304-310.