Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 116, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 685-693

  Barnett, Jason C ^a   Judd, John P ^a   Wu, Jennifer M ^a   Scales, Charles D ^a   Myers, Evan R ^a   Havrilesky, Laura J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURGERY; CAREGIVER; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; HOSPITAL COST; HOSPITAL PATIENT; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MEDICAL FEE; OPERATING ROOM; OPERATION DURATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROBOTICS; SALARY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURGEON; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ECONOMICS; ENDOMETRIUM TUMOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; MODELS, ECONOMIC; ROBOTICS;

EID: 77957272492     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ee6e4d     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59:225-49.
2. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlae-rth JB, Mannel RS, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparot-omy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:5331-6.
3. Zorlu CG, Simsek T, Ari ES. Laparoscopy or laparotomy for the management of endometrial cancer. JSLS 2005;9:442-6.
4. Zullo F, Palomba S, Russo T, Falbo A, Costantino M, Tolino A, et al. A prospective randomized comparison between laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches in women with early stage endometrial cancer: a focus on the quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1344-52.
5. Fram KM. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in stage I endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2002;12:57-61.
6. Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, Perone C, Rasile M, Iuzzolino D, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer: a prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol 2009;112:126-33.
7. Tozzi R, Malur S, Koehler C, Schneider A. Analysis of morbidity in patients with endometrial cancer: is there a commitment to offer laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol 2005;97: 4-9.
8. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN, et al. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:360.e1-9.
9. Seamon LG, Bryant SA, Rheaume PS, Kimball KJ, Huh WK, Fowler JM, et al. Comprehensive surgical staging for endome-trial cancer in obese patients: comparing robotics and laparot-omy. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:16-21.
10. Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS, Kim KH, Carlson MJ, Phillips GS, et al. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: robotics or laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol 2009;113:36-41.
11. DeNardis SA, Holloway RW, Bigsby GE 4th, Pikaart DP, Ahmad S, Finkler NJ. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hyster-ectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphade-nectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111: 412-7.
12. Luce B, Manning WG, Siegel JE, Lipscomb J. Estimating costs in cost-effectiveness analysis. In: Marthe R, Gold JES, Russel LB, Weinstein MC, editors. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1996, p. 196-8.
13. Rocconi RP, Case AS, Straughn JM Jr, Estes JM, Partridge EE. Role of chemotherapy for patients with recurrent platinum-resistant advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a cost-effective-ness analysis. Cancer 2006;107:536-43.
14. Havrilesky LJ, Secord AA, Darcy KM, Armstrong DK, Kulasingam S; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Cost effectiveness of intraperitoneal compared with intravenous chemotherapy for women with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2008;26: 4144-50.
15. Davis JB. Medical fees in the United States 2008: nationwide charges for medicine, surgery, laboratory, radiology and allied health services. 14th ed. Los Angeles (CA): Practice Manage-ment Information Corporation; 2008.
16. Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111:407-11.
17. Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 2004;239:14-21.
18. Gehrig PA, Cantrell LA, Shafer A, Abaid LN, Mendivil A, Boggess JF. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman? Gynecol Oncol 2008;111:41-5.
19. Hidlebaugh DA. Cost and quality-of-life issues associated with different surgical therapies for the treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2000;27: 451-65.
20. Frigerio L, Gallo A, Ghezzi F, Trezzi G, Lussana M, Franchi M. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdom-inal hysterectomy in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006;93:209-13.