Joint model of vehicle type choice and tour length

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2255, 2011, Pages 28-37

  Konduri, Karthik C ^a   Ye, Xin ^b   Sana, Bhargava ^c   Pendyala, Ram M ^a  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c RESOURCE SYSTEMS GROUP INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; SPECIFICATIONS;

'CURRENT; ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY; GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS; JOINT MODELS; MICROSIMULATION MODELING; MODELLING SYSTEMS; TRAVEL DEMAND; TWO-DIMENSIONS; VEHICLE TYPE CHOICES; VEHICLE TYPES;

VEHICLES;

EID: 84856679683     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2255-04     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arentze, T., F. Hofman, H. van Mourik, and H. Timmermans. Albatross: Multiagent, Rule-Based Model of Activity Pattern Decisions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1706, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 136-144. (Pubitemid 32790737)
2. Kitamura, R., and S. Fuji. Two Computational Process Models of Activity-Travel Behavior. In Theoretical Foundations of Travel Choice Modeling (T. Garling, T. Laitila, and K. Westin, eds.), Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1998, pp. 251-279.
3. Pendyala, R. M., R. Kitamura, A. Kikuchi, T. Yamamoto, and S. Fuji. Florida Activity Mobility Simulator: Overview and Preliminary Validation Results. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1921, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 123-130.
4. Bhat, C. R., J. Y. Guo, S. Srinivasan, and A. Sivakumar. Comprehensive Econometric Microsimulator for Daily Activity-Travel Patterns. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1894, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 57-66. (Pubitemid 40748742)
5. Bowman, J. L., and M. Ben-Akiva. Activity-Based Disaggregate Travel Demand Model System with Activity Schedules. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2000, pp. 1-28.
6. Vovsha, P., E. Petersen, and R. Donnelly. Microsimulation in Travel Demand Modeling: Lessons Learned from the New York Best Practice Model. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 68-77.
7. Miller, E., M. Roorda, and J. Carrasco. A Tour-Based Model of Travel Mode Choice. Transportation, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2005, pp. 399-422. (Pubitemid 40815022)
8. Bradley, M., J. L. Bowman, and B. Griesenbeck. SACSIM: An Applied Activity-Based Model System with Fine Level Spatial and Temporal Resolution. International Journal of Choice Modelling, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2009, pp. 5-31.
9. Yagi, S., and A. Mohammadian. An Activity-Based Microsimulation Model of Travel Demand in the Jakarta Metropolitan Area. International Journal of Choice Modelling, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2009, pp. 32-57.
10. Algers, S., A. Daly, P. Kjellman, and S. Widlert. Stockholm Model System (SIMS): Application. Proc., 7th World Conference of Transportation Research, Vol. 2, Sydney, Australia, 1995, pp. 345-361.
11. Bradley, M., J. L. Bowman, and B. Griesenbeck. Activity-Based Model for a Medium Sized City: Sacramento. Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 50, No. 2, 2009, pp. 73-79.
12. Hensher, D. A. Climate Change, Enhanced Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Passenger Transport: What Can We Do to Make a Difference? Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2008, pp. 95-111.
13. Spissu, E., A. R. Pinjari, R. M. Pendyala, and C. R. Bhat. A Copula- Based Joint Multinomial Discrete-Continuous Model of Vehicle Type Choice and Miles of Travel. Transportation, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2009, pp. 403-422.
14. Mohammadian, A., and E. J. Miller. Empirical Investigation of Household Vehicle Type Decisions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1854, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 99-106.
15. Bhat, C. R., and S. Sen. Household Vehicle Type Holdings and Usage: An Application of the Multiple Discrete-Continuous Extreme Value (MDCEV) Model. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2006, pp. 35-53. (Pubitemid 41245404)
16. Cao, X., P. L. Mokhtarian, and S. L. Handy. Neighborhood Design and Vehicle Type Choice: Evidence from Northern California. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2006, pp. 133-145.
17. Eluru, N., C. R. Bhat, R. M. Pendyala, and K. C. Konduri. A Joint Flexible Econometric Model System of Household Residential Location and Vehicle Fleet Composition/Usage Choices. Transportation, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2010, pp. 603-626.
18. Pendyala, R. M., and C. R. Bhat. An Exploration of the Relationship Between Timing and Duration of Maintenance Activities. Transportation, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2004, pp. 429-456. (Pubitemid 39142430)
19. Ye, X., and R. M. Pendyala. A Probit-Based Joint Discrete-Continuous Model System: Analyzing the Relationship Between Timing and Duration of Maintenance Activities. In Transportation and Traffic Theory (W. Lam, S. C. Wong, and H. Lo, eds.), Springer, New York, 2009, pp. 403-424.
20. Mannering, F. L. A Note on Endogenous Variables in Household Vehicle Utilization Equations. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1986, pp. 1-6.
21. Bhat, C. R. A Model of Post Home-Arrival Activity Participation Behavior. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 32, No. 6, 1998, pp. 387-400. (Pubitemid 28453880)
22. Konduri, K. C., X. Ye, and R. M. Pendyala. Probit-Based Discrete- Continuous Model of Activity Choice and Duration with History Dependency. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2156, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 17-27.
23. Bhat, C. R. Quasi-Random Maximum Simulated Likelihood Estimation of the Mixed Multinomial Logit Model. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 35, No. 7, 2001, pp. 677-693. (Pubitemid 32722834)
24. Walker, J. Mixed Logit (or Logit Kernel) Model: Dispelling Misconceptions of Identification. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 86-98.
25. Cox, D. Tests of Separate Families of Hypotheses. Proc., 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 1, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1961.
26. Cox, D. Further Results on Tests of Separate Families of Hypotheses. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, Vol. 24, 1962, pp. 406-424.
27. Horowitz, J. L. Statistical Comparison of Non-Nested Probabilistic Discrete Choice Models. Transportation Science, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1983, pp. 319-350.
28. Ben-Akiva, M. E., and J. D. Swait. The Akaike Likelihood Ratio Index. Transportation Science, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1984, pp. 133-136.
29. McCarthy, P. S., and R. S. Tay. New Vehicle Consumption and Fuel Efficiency: A Nested Logit Approach. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 34, No. 1, 1998, pp. 39-51.
30. Ye, X., R. M. Pendyala, and G. Gottardi. An Exploration of the Relationship Between Mode Choice and Complexity of Trip Chaining Patterns. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2007, pp. 96-113 (Pubitemid 44184875)