Probit-based discrete-continuous model of activity choice and duration with history dependency

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2156, 2010, Pages 17-27

  Konduri, Karthik C ^a   Ye, Xin ^b   Pendyala, Ram M ^a  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY DURATION; ACTIVITY EPISODES; ACTIVITY PARTICIPATION; ACTIVITYBASED MODELING (ABM); CONTINUOUS MODELS; DISCRETE/CONTINUOUS; GENERATION PROCESS; HISTORY DEPENDENCIES; MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY; MODELLING SYSTEMS;

EID: 78651337132     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2156-03     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Arentze, T., F. Hofman, H. van Mourik, and H. Timmermans. Albatross: Multiagent, Rule-Based Model of Activity Pattern Decisions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1706, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 136-144.
2. Miller, E. J., and P. A. Salvini. The Integrated Land Use, Transportation Environment (ILUTE) Microsimulation Modeling System: Description and Current Status. In Travel Behaviour Research: The Leading Edge (D. Hensher, ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2001, pp. 711-724.
3. Pendyala, R. M., R. Kitamura, A. Kikuchi, T. Yamamoto, and S. Fujii. Florida Activity Mobility Simulator: Overview and Preliminary Validation Results. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1921, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 123-130.
4. Pinjari, A. R., N. Eluru, S. Srinivasan, J. Y. Guo, R. B. Copperman, I. N. Sener, and C. R. Bhat. CEMDAP: Modeling and Microsimulation Frameworks, Software Development, and Verification. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
5. Timmermans, H. J. P., and T. Arentze. Coevolutionary Dynamics in Social Networks and Activity-Travel Repertoires: Framework for Microsimulation. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
6. Laresen, J., K. W. Axhausen, and J. Urry. Geographies of Social Networks: Meetings, Travel and Communications. Mobilities, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2006, pp. 261-283.
7. Axhausen, K. W. Activity Spaces, Biographies, Social Networks, and Their Welfare Gains and Externalities: Some Hypotheses and Empirical Results. Mobilities, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2007, pp. 15-36.
8. Kitamura, R., T. Yamamoto, S. Fujii, and S. Sampath. A Discrete- Continuous Analysis of Time Allocation to Two Types of Discretionary Activities Which Accounts for Unobserved Heterogeneity. In Transportation and Traffic Theory (J. B. Lesort, ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1996, pp. 431-453.
9. Bhat, C. R., and R. Misra. Discretionary Activity Time Allocation of Individuals Between In-home and Out-of-home and Between Weekdays and Weekends. Transportation, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1999, pp. 193-209.
10. Pendyala, R. M., and C. R. Bhat. An Exploration of the Relationship Between Timing and Duration of Maintenance Activities. Transportation, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2004, pp. 429-456.
11. Chen, C., and P. L. Mokhtarian. Tradeoffs Between Time Allocations to Maintenance Activities/Travel and Discretionary Activities/Travel. Transportation, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2006, pp. 223-240.
12. Pendyala, R. M., R. Kitamura, C. Chen, and E. I. Pas. An Activity-Based Microsimulation Analysis of Transportation Control Measures. Transport Policy, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1997, pp. 183-192.
13. Toole-Holt, L., S. E. Polzin, and R. M. Pendyala. Two Minutes per Person per Day Each Year: Exploration of Growth in Travel Time Expenditures. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1917, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 45-53.
14. Yamamoto, T., and R. Kitamura. An Analysis of Time Allocation to In-home and Out-of-home Discretionary Activities Across Working Days and Non-working Days. Transportation, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1999, pp. 211-230.
15. Clifton, K. J., G. Akar, and S. T. Doherty. Influence of Personal and Activity Attributes on Discretionary Activity Location Choice: In Home or Out of Home? Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
16. Kitamura, R., and M. Kermenshah. Identifying Time and History Dependencies of Activity Choice. In Transportation Research Record 944, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1983, pp. 22-30.
17. Kitamura, R., C. Chen, and R. M. Pendyala. Generation of Synthetic Daily Activity-Travel Patterns. In Transportation Research Record 1607, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 154-162.
18. Kasturirangan, K., R. M. Pendyala, and F. S. Koppelman. History Dependency of Daily Activity Participation and Time Allocation for Commuters. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1807, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 129-136.
19. Ettema, D., A. Borgers, and H. Timmermans. Competing Risk Hazard Model of Activity Choice, Timing, Sequencing, and Duration. In Transportation Research Record 1493, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 101-109.
20. Hamed, M., and F. L. Mannering. Modeling Travelers' Postwork Activity Involvement: Toward a New Methodology. Transportation Science, Vol. 27, No. 4, 1993, pp. 381-394.
21. Bhat, C. R. A Model of Post Home-Arrival Activity Participation Behavior. Transportation Research, Vol. 32B, No. 6, 1998, pp. 387-400.
22. Misra, R. Time-Quantum Hurdle Model for Activity Type and Duration of Nonworkers. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1676, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 103-108.
23. Ettema, D., F. Bastin, J. Polak, and O. Ashiru. Modeling the Joint Choice of Activity Timing and Duration. Transportation Research, Vol. 41A, No. 9, 2007, pp. 827-841.
24. Anggraini, R., A. T. Arentze, and H. J. P. Timmermans. Continuous Choice Model of Timing and Duration of Joint Activities. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2135, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 17-24.
25. Ye, X., and R. M. Pendyala. Probit-Based Joint Discrete-Continuous Model System: Analyzing Relationship Between Timing and Duration of Maintenance Activities. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
26. Bhat, C. R. Quasi-random Maximum Simulated Likelihood Estimation of the Mixed Multinomial Logit Model. Transportation Research, Vol. 35B, No. 7, 2001, pp. 677-693.
27. Train, K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2003.
28. Walker, J. Mixed Logit (or Logit Kernel) Model: Dispelling Misconceptions of Identification. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 86-98.
29. ATUS website. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. http://www.bls.gov/tus/.