How to rate programming skills in programming experiments? A preliminary, exploratory, study based on university marks, pretests, and self-estimation

PLATEAU'11 - Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Evaluation and Usability of Programming Languages and Tools

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 15-24

  Kleinschmager, Sebastian ^a   Hanenberg, Stefan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

experimentation; human subjects; programming

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL STUDIES; EXPERIMENTATION; EXPLORATORY STUDIES; HUMAN SUBJECTS; PROGRAMMING SKILLS;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; ESTIMATION; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING;

EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 84856666252     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2089155.2089161     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Boehm-Davis, D.; Ross, L.: Approaches to Structuring the Software Development Process, International Journal of Man-Machine Systems, 1991.
2. Bortz, J.: Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler, 5th ed., Springer, 1999.
3. Conover, W. J.: Practical nonparametric statistics, 3rd edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
4. Filman, R.; Elrad, T.; Clarke S.; Aksit, M. (eds.): Aspect- Oriented Software Development, Addison-Wesley Longman, Amsterdam, 2004.
5. Hanenberg, S.; Kleinschmager, S.; Josupeit-Walter, M.: Does Aspect-Oriented Programming Increase the Development Speed for Crosscutting Code? An Empirical Study, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, Florida, USA, 2009, pp. 156-167.
6. Stuchlik, A., Hanenberg, S.: Static vs. Dynamic Type Systems: An empirical study about the relationship between type casts and development time, Dynamic Language Symposium, Portland, Oregon, 2011,
7. Höst, M.; Regnell, B.; Wohlin, C.: Using Students as Subjects - A Comparative Study ofStudents and Professionals in Lead-Time Impact Assessment, ESEM 2000, pp. 201-214
8. Juristo, N.; Moreno, A.: Basics of Software Engineering Experimentation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.
9. Kiczales, G.; Lamping, J.; Mendhekar, A.; Maeda, C.; Lopes, C.; Loingtier, J.-M.; Irwin, J.: Aspect-Oriented Programming. Proceedings of European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP), 1997, pp. 220-242.
10. Pfleeger, S. L.: Experimental Design and Analysis in Software Engineering, Software Engineering Notes, vol 20, No 3, 1995, pp. 13-15.
11. Prechelt, L.: Kontrollierte Experimente in der Softwaretechnik, Springer, 2001.
12. Shull, F., Singer, J., Sjøberg, D. (eds.), Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, Springer, 2008.
13. Svahnberg, M.; Aurum, A.; Wohlin, C.: Using students as subjects - an empirical evaluation, Proceedings of the Second ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement (ESEM), pp. 288-290.
14. Tichy, W.: Should Computer Scientists Experiment More? IEEE Computer 31(5), 1998, pp. 32-40.
15. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M.: Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction, Springer, 1999.
16. Katira, N.; Williams, L.; Wiebe, E.; Miller, C.; Balik, S.; Gehringer, E.: On Understanding Compatibility of Student Pair Programmers", Proceedings of ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE), Norfolk, VA, pp. 7-11, 2004.
17. Bishop-Clark, Wheeler, D.: The Myers-Briggs personality type and its relationship to computer programming, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), Spring 1994, pp. 358-370.
18. Boehm, B.W. Software Engineering Economics. Prentice- Hall advances in computing science and technology series. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1981.
19. Pressman, R.S., Chapter 19: Software testing strategies, in Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach. McGraw- Hill, New York, 1992, 654-658.
20. Devito Da Cunha, A.; Greathead, D.: Does personality matter? An analysis of code-review abilities, CACM Vol. 50, No. 5, 2007, pp. 109-112.
21. Hanenberg, S.; What is the impact of static type systems on development time, Workshop on Evaluation and Usability of Programming Languages and Tools (PLATEAU) at Onward 2009.
22. Prechelt, L., Tichy W.: A Controlled Experiment to Assess the Benefits of Procedure Argument Type Checking, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24(4), 1998, S. 302-312. (Pubitemid 128740281)