The relationship between reaction time and response variability and somatosensory No-go potentials

European Journal of Applied Physiology

Volumn 112, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 207-214

  Nakata, Hiroki ^a,b   Sakamoto, Kiwako ^a,b   Kakigi, Ryusuke ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

N140; No go; Nogo; P300; Response inhibition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN; DECISION MAKING; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS;

ADULT; BRAIN; DECISION MAKING; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84856552979     PISSN: 14396319     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-1973-5     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. GP Band KR Ridderinkhof MW van der Molen 2003 Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: the roles of activation and inhibition Psychol Res 67 266 279 14634814 10.1007/s00426-002-0127-0 (Pubitemid 38284613)
2. MA Bellgrove R Hester H Garavan 2004 The functional neuroanatomical correlates of response variability: evidence from a response inhibition task Neuropsychologia 42 1910 1916 15381021 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.05.007 (Pubitemid 39223300)
3. C Bledowski D Prvulovic K Hoechstetter M Scherg M Wibral R Goebel DE Linden 2004 Localizing P300 generators in visual target and distractor processing: a combined event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study J Neurosci 24 9353 9360 15496671 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1897-04.2004 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXpsVWgsbc%3D (Pubitemid 39426172)
4. H Bokura S Yamaguchi S Kobayashi 2001 Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task Clin Neurophysiol 112 2224 2232 11738192 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00691-5 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnptFertA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 33153144)
5. TS Braver DM Barch JR Gray DL Molfese A Snyder 2001 Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition and errors Cereb Cortex 11 825 836 11532888 10.1093/cercor/11.9.825 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MvovF2ruw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32800550)
6. KJ Bruin AA Wijers 2002 Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study Clin Neurophysiol 113 1172 1182 12088714 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00141-4 1:STN:280: DC%2BD38zksF2qsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 34667157)
7. E Donchin MG Coles 1988 Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav Brain Sci 11 357 374 10.1017/S0140525X00058027
8. FC Donkers GJ van Boxtel 2004 The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition Brain Cogn 56 165 176 15518933 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.04.005 (Pubitemid 39423879)
9. C Doucet MR Stelmack 1999 The effect of response execution on P3 latency, reaction time, and movement time Psychophysiology 36 351 363 10352559 10.1017/S0048577299980563 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3otVyhtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29237435)
10. M Falkenstein NA Koshlykova VN Kiroi J Hoormann J Hohnsbein 1995 Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 96 36 43 7530187 10.1016/0013-4694(94)00182-K 1:STN:280: DyaK2M7ivFCnsg%3D%3D
11. M Falkenstein J Hoormann J Hohnsbein 1999 ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition Acta Psychol 101 267 291 10.1016/S0001- 6918(99)00008-6 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3nsFKmtA%3D%3D
12. M Falkenstein J Hoormann J Hohnsbein 2002 Inhibition-related ERP components: variation with modality, age, and time-on-task J Psychophysiol 16 167 175 10.1027//0269-8803.16.3.167 (Pubitemid 35314864)
13. AJ Fallgatter WK Strik 1999 The NoGo-anteriorization as a neurophysiological standard-index for cognitive response control Int J Psychophysiol 32 233 238 10437634 10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00018-5 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzmsVehsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29319758)
14. JM Ford A Pfefferbaum JR Tinklenberg BS Kopell 1982 Effects of perceptual and cognitive difficulty on P3 and RT in young and old adults Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 54 311 321 6179758 10.1016/0013-4694(82) 90180-8 1:STN:280:DyaL383mtFCnsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 12020969)
15. H Garavan TJ Ross EA Stein 1999 Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96 8301 8306 10393989 10.1073/pnas.96.14.8301 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXltVOrtrg%3D (Pubitemid 29328449)
16. H Gemba K Sasaki 1989 Potential related to no-go reaction in go/no-nogo hand movement task with color discrimination in human Neurosci Lett 101 263 268 2771172 10.1016/0304-3940(89)90543-0 1:STN:280:DyaL1MzmsFyjug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 19159422)
17. H Gemba K Sasaki 1990 Potential related to no-go reaction in go/no-nogo hand movement with discrimination between tone stimuli of different frequencies in the monkey Brain Res 537 340 344 2085784 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90382-L 1:STN:280:DyaK3M7pvVymtA%3D%3D
18. HH Jasper 1958 The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 10 371 375
19. E Jodo Y Kayama 1992 Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 82 477 482 1375556 10.1016/0013-4694(92)90054-L 1:STN:280:DyaK383nsVyqtA%3D%3D
20. R Johnson Jr J Barnhardt J Zhu 2005 Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: an event-related brain potential study Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 24 386 404 16099352 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.011 (Pubitemid 41133277)
21. K Kamijo Y Nishihira A Hatta T Kaneda T Wasaka T Kida K Kuroiwa 2004 Differential influences of exercise intensity on information processing in the central nervous system Eur J Appl Physiol 92 305 311 15083372 10.1007/s00421-004-1097-2 (Pubitemid 39117493)
22. J Kekoni H Hämäläinen V McCloud K Reinikainen R Näätänen 1996 Is the somatosensory N250 related to deviance discrimination or conscious target detection? Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 100 115 125 8617150 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00231-6 1:STN:280:DyaK283gtlSmug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26125832)
23. T Kida Y Nishihira A Hatta T Wasaka 2003 Somatosensory N250 and P300 during discrimination tasks Int J Psychophysiol 48 275 283 12798987 10.1016/S0167-8760(03)00021-7 (Pubitemid 36683231)
24. T Kida Y Nishihira T Wasaka H Nakata M Sakamoto 2004 Differential modulation of temporal and frontal components of the somatosensory N140 and the effect of interstimulus interval in a selective attention task Brain Res Cog Brain Res 19 33 39 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.016 (Pubitemid 38221545)
25. M Kiefer F Marzinzik M Wetsbrod M Scherg M Spitzer 1998 The time course of brain activations during response inhibition: evidence from event-related potentials in a go/no go task NeuroReport 9 765 770 9559953 10.1097/00001756- 199803090-00037 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3hvVyrsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28131300)
26. A Kok 1986 Effects of degradation of visual stimulation on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/nogo reaction tasks Biol Psychol 23 21 38 3790646 10.1016/0301-0511(86)90087-6 1:STN:280:DyaL2s%2Fns1yitw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 17184871)
27. S Konishi K Nakajima I Uchida H Kikyo M Kameyama Y Miyashita 1999 Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI Brain 122 981 991 10355680 10.1093/brain/122.5.981 (Pubitemid 29219269)
28. B Kopp U Mattler R Goertz F Rist 1996 N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 99 19 27 8758967 1:STN:280: DyaK28zht12gtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26241834)
29. M Kutas G McCarthy E Donchin 1977 Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time Science 197 792 795 887923 10.1126/science.887923 1:STN:280:DyaE2s3js1ShtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 8153410)
30. G McCarthy E Donchin 1981 A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time Science 211 77 80 7444452 10.1126/science.7444452 1:STN:280:DyaL3M%2FnvVOlsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 11148488)
31. H Nakamoto S Mori 2008 Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in mediating expert performance in baseball players Brain Res 1189 179 188 18048011 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.096 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXlt1CjsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 351842541)
32. H Nakata K Inui Y Nishihira A Hatta M Sakamoto T Kida T Wasaka R Kakigi 2004 Effects of a go/nogo task on event-related potentials following somatosensory stimulation Clin Neurophysiol 115 361 368 14744578 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.09.013 (Pubitemid 38117257)
33. H Nakata K Inui T Wasaka Y Tamura T Kida R Kakigi 2005 Effects of ISI and stimulus probability on event-related go/nogo potentials after somatosensory stimulation Exp Brain Res 162 293 299 15599719 10.1007/s00221-004-2195-4 (Pubitemid 40576804)
34. H Nakata K Inui T Wasaka K Akatsuka R Kakigi 2005 Somato-motor inhibitory processing in humans: a study with MEG and ERP Eur J Neurosci 22 1784 1792 16197519 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04368.x (Pubitemid 41482967)
35. H Nakata K Inui T Wasaka Y Tamura K Akatsuka T Kida R Kakigi 2006 Higher anticipated force required a stronger inhibitory process in go/nogo tasks Clin Neurophysiol 117 1669 1676 16798081 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.03.032 (Pubitemid 44094261)
36. H Nakata K Inui T Wasaka Y Tamura T Kida R Kakigi 2006 The characteristics of the nogo-N140 component in somatosensory go/nogo tasks Neurosci Lett 397 318 322 16406341 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.12.041 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XisFOqsbk%3D
37. H Nakata K Sakamoto A Ferretti M Gianni Perrucci C Del Gratta R Kakigi G Luca Romani 2008 Somato-motor inhibitory processing in humans: an event-related functional MRI study NeuroImage 39 1858 1866 18083602 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007. 10.041
38. H Nakata K Sakamoto K Inui M Hoshiyama R Kakigi 2009 The characteristics of no-go potentials with intraepidermal stimulation NeuroReport 20 1149 1154 19617857 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832f81d6
39. H Nakata K Sakamoto R Kakigi 2010 Effects of inter-stimulus interval on somatosensory Go/No-go ERPs NeuroReport 21 1040 1044 20838262 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32833f7bb5
40. H Nakata K Sakamoto R Kakigi 2010 Characteristics of No-go P300 component during somatosensory Go/No-go paradigms Neurosci Lett 478 124 127 20452400 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.002 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXntlahtLg%3D
41. S Nieuwenhuis N Yeung W van den Wildenberg KR Ridderinkhof 2003 Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 3 17 26 12822595 10.3758/CABN.3.1.17 (Pubitemid 37517032)
42. A Pfefferbaum J Ford R Johnson Jr B Wenegrat BS Kopell 1983 Manipulation of P3 latency: speed vs. accuracy instructions Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 55 188 197 6185317 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90187-6 1:STN:280:DyaL3s7gsVyruw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 13179693)
43. A Pfefferbaum JM Ford BJ Weller BS Kopell 1985 ERPs to response production and inhibition Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 60 423 434 2580694 10.1016/0013-4694(85)91017-X 1:STN:280:DyaL2M7nvFajsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 15025880)
44. W Ritter R Simson HG Vaughan Jr D Friedman 1979 A brain event related to the making of a sensory discrimination Science 203 1358 1361 424760 10.1126/science.424760 1:STN:280:DyaE1M7jvVOgsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 9150872)
45. RA Roche H Garavan JJ Foxe SM O'mara 2005 Individual differences discriminate event-related potentials but not performance during response inhibition Exp Brain Res 160 60 70 15480606 10.1007/s00221-004-1985-z (Pubitemid 40064662)
46. WT Roth JM Ford BS Kopell 1978 Long-latency evoked potentials and reaction time Psychophysiology 15 17 23 625519 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1978.tb01328. x 1:STN:280:DyaE1c7hs1eksQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 8275011)
47. SJ Segalowitz J Dywan A Unsal 1997 Attentional factors in response time variability after traumatic brain injury: an ERP study J Int Neuropsychol Soc 3 95 107 9126851 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3nt1SjtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27168258)
48. DJ Simmonds SG Fotedar SJ Suskauer JJ Pekar MB Denckla SH Mostofsky 2007 Functional brain correlates of response time variability in children Neuropsychologia 45 2147 2157 17350054 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.013 (Pubitemid 46654105)
49. JL Smith SJ Johnstone RJ Barry 2006 Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition Int J Psychophysiol 61 121 133 16214250 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005. 07.013
50. JL Smith SJ Johnstone RJ Barry 2007 Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict Clin Neurophysiol 118 343 355 17140848 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.09.027 (Pubitemid 46038808)
51. WK Strik AJ Fallgatter D Brandeis RD Pascual-Marqui 1998 Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108 406 413 9714383 10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00021-5 1:STN:280:DyaK1cznvVWrtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28335668)
52. Y Tian D Yao 2008 A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task Biol Psychol 79 171 178 18524452 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.04.006
53. A Vallesi DT Stuss AR McIntosh TW Picton 2009 Age-related differences in processing irrelevant information: evidence from event-related potentials Neuropsychologia 47 577 586 19022270 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.018
54. S van Gaal KR Ridderinkhof JJ Fahrenfort HS Scholte VA Lamme 2008 Frontal cortex mediates unconsciously triggered inhibitory control J Neurosci 28 8053 8062 18685030 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1278-08.2008