Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in mediating expert performance in baseball players

Brain Research

Volumn 1189, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 179-188

  Nakamoto, Hiroki ^a   Mori, Shiro ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FITNESS AND SPORTS IN KANOYA   (Japan)

Author keywords

Event related potential; Expertise; Response inhibition; Response selection; Stimulus response compatibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BASEBALL; COLOR; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CONTROL GROUP; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SPORT; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADOLESCENT; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; LEARNING; MENTAL FUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REFLEX; TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BASEBALL; COGNITION; CUES; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; MOTOR SKILLS; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; REFLEX; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 44449089094     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.096     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abernethy B. Training the visual-perceptual skills of athletes: insights from the study of motor expertise. Am. J. Sports Med. 24 (1996) S89-S92
2. Bahill A.T., and Karnavas W.J. The perceptual illusion of baseball's rising fastball and breaking curveball. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 19 (1993) 3-14
3. Band G.P.H., Ridderinkhof K.R., and van der Molen M.W. Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: the roles of activation and inhibition. Psychol. Res. 67 (2003) 266-279
4. Burroughs W.A. Visual simulation training of baseball batters. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 15 (1984) 117-126
5. Botwinick J., and Thompson L. Premotor and motor components of reaction time. J. Exp. Psychol. 71 (1966) 9-15
6. Coles M.G.H. Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology 26 (1989) 251-269
7. Di Russo F., Taddei F., Apnile T., and Spinelli D. Neural correlates of fast stimulus discrimination and response selection in top-level fencers. Neurosci. Lett. 408 (2006) 113-118
8. Donders F.C. On the speed of mental processes. Acta Psychol. 30 (1969) 412-431 (Original work published in 1868)
9. Dunkan-Johnson C.C., and Kopell B.S. The locus of interference in a Stroop task: when you read "blue," do you see "red"?. Psychophysiology 17 (1980) 308-309
10. Eimer M. Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task. Biol. Psychol. 35 (1993) 123-138
11. Ericsson K.A. Development of elite performance and deliberate practice: an update from the perspective of the expert performance approach. In: Starkes J.L., and Ericsson K.A. (Eds). Expert Performance in Sports: Advances in Research on Sport Expertise (2003), Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign, Illinois 50-83
12. Falkenstein M., Koshlykova N.A., Kiroj V.N., Hoormann J., and Hohnsbein J. Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 96 (1995) 36-43
13. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., and Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychol. 101 (1999) 267-291
14. Fallgatter A.J., and Strik W.K. The NoGo-anteriorization as a neurophysiological standard-index for cognitive response control. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 32 (1999) 233-238
15. Fitts P.M., and Seeger C.M. S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. J. Exp. Psychol. 46 (1953) 199-210
16. Fitts P.M., and Deininger R.L. S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. J. Exp. Psychol. 48 (1954) 483-492
17. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Sirevaag E.J., Eliksen C.W., and Donchin E. Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 14 (1988) 331-344
18. Gray R. Behavior of college baseball players in a virtual batting task. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28 (2002) 1131-1148
19. Hill N.M., and Schneider W. Brain changes in the development of expertise: neuroanatomical and neurophysiological evidence about skill-based adaptations. In: Ericsson K.A., Charness N., Feltovich P.J., and Hoffman R.R. (Eds). The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (2006), Cambridge University Press, United States 653-682
20. Hommel B., and Prinz W. Theoretical Issues in Stimulus-Response Compatibility (1997), Elsevier, North Holland, Amsterdam
21. Jodo E., and Kayama Y. Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 82 (1992) 477-482
22. Kida N., Oda S., and Matsumura M. Intensive baseball practice improves the Go/Nogo reaction time, but not the simple reaction time. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 22 (2005) 257-264
23. Konishi S., Nakajima K., Uchida I., Sekihara K., and Miyashita Y. No-go dominant brain activity in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Eur. J. Neurosci. 10 (1998) 1209-1213
24. Konishi S., Nakajima K., Uchida I., Kikyo H., Kameyama M., and Miyashita Y. Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. Brain 122 (1999) 981-991
25. Kornblum S. Dimensional overlap and dimensional relevance in stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility. In: Stelmach G.E., and Requin J. (Eds). Tutorials in Motor Behavior II (1992), Elsevier, North Holland, Amsterdam 743-777
26. Kornblum S., and Lee J.W. Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21 (1995) 855-875
27. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., and Osman A. Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: a model and taxonomy. Psychol. Rev. 97 (1990) 253-270
28. Kutas M., McCarthy G., and Donchin E. Augmenting mental chronometry: the P3 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science 197 (1977) 792-795
29. Lee D.N. A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception 5 (1976) 437-459
30. Luria A.R. The Role of Speech in the Regulation of Normal and Abnormal Behavior (1961), Pergamon Press, New York
31. Luria A.R. The Working Brain (1973), Penguin, London
32. Low K.A., Miller J., and Vierck E. Response slowing in Parkinson's disease: a psychophysiological analysis of premotor and motor processes. Brain 125 (2002) 1980-1994
33. Masaki H., Takasawa N., and Yamazaki K. An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. Psychophysiology 37 (2000) 464-472
34. Masaki H., Wild-Wall N., Sangals J., and Sommer W. The functional locus of the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology 41 (2004) 220-230
35. McCarthy G., and Donchin E. A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science 211 (1981) 77-80
36. Melnikov A.V., and Singer R.N. Analysis of event-related potentials to filmed action situations. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 69 (1998) 400-405
37. Miller J., Patterson T., and Ulrich R. Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology 35 (1998) 99-115
38. Mori S., Ohtani Y., and Imanaka K. Reaction times and anticipatory skills of karate athletes. Hum. Mov. Sci. 21 (2002) 213-230
39. Nielson K.A., Langenecker S.A., and Garavan H. Differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control across the adult life span. Psychol. Aging 17 (2002) 56-71
40. Oddy B.W., Barry R.J., Johnstone S.J., and Clarke A.R. Removal of CNV effects from the N2 and P3 ERP components in a visual Go/NoGo task. J. Psychophysiol. 19 (2005) 24-34
41. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
42. Osman A., Moore C.M., and Ulrich R. Bisecting RT with lateralized readiness potentials: precue effects after LRP onset. Acta Psychol. 90 (1995) 111-127
43. Pliszka S.R., Liottia M., and Woldorffb M.G. Inhibitory control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: event-related potentials identify the processing component and timing of an impaired right-frontal response-inhibition mechanism. Biol. Psychiatry 48 (2000) 238-246
44. Proctor R.W., and Vu K.P.L. Human information processing: an overview for human-computer interaction. In: Jacko J.A., and Sears A. (Eds). The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications (2003), Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey 35-51
45. Proctor R.W., and Vu K.P.L. Stimulus-Response Compatibility Principles: Data, Theory, and Application (2006), CRC/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, Florida
46. Radlo S.J., Janelle C.M., Barba D.A., and Frehlich S.G. Perceptual decision making for baseball pitch recognition: using P300 latency and amplitude to index attentional processing. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 72 (2001) 22-31
47. Ragot R., and Fiori N. Mental processing during reactions toward and away from a stimulus: an ERP analysis of auditory congruence and S-R compatibility. Psychophysiology 31 (1994) 439-446
48. Roberts L.E., Rau H., Lutzenberger W., and Birbaumer N. Mapping P300 waves onto inhibition: Go/No-Go discrimination. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 92 (1994) 44-55
49. Rushton S.K., and Wann J.P. Weighted combination of size and disparity: a computational model for timing a ball catch. Nat. Neurosci. 2 (1999) 186-190
50. Sasaki K., and Gemba H. Electrical activity in the prefrontal cortex specific to no-go reaction of conditioned hand movement with colour discrimination in the monkey. Exp. Brain Res. 64 (1986) 603-606
51. Schiff W., Caviness J.A., and Gibson J.J. Persistent fear responses in rhesus monkeys to the optical stimulus of "looming". Science 136 (1962) 982-983
52. Schmidt R.A., and Wrisberg C.A. Processing information and making decisions. In: Schmidt R.A., and Wrisberg C.A. (Eds). Motor Learning and Performance: A Problem-based Learning Approach. 3rd ed. (2004), Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign, Illinois 53-89
53. Simson R., Vaughan H.G., and Ritter W. The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual go/nogo tasks. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 43 (1977) 864-875
54. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., and Barry R.J. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 61 (2006) 121-133
55. Ulrich R., and Miller J. Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 816-827
56. van der Kamp J., Bennett S.J., Savelsbergh G.J.P., and Davids K. Timing a one-handed catch: II. Adaptation to telestereoscopic viewing. Exp. Brain Res. 129 (1999) 369-377
57. West R., and Alain C. Age-related decline in inhibitory control contributes to the increased Stroop effect observed in older adults. Psychophysiology 37 (2000) 179-189
58. Williams A.M., and Starkes J. Cognitive expertise and performance in interceptive actions. In: Davids K., Savelsbergh G., Bennett S.J., and Van der Kamp J. (Eds). Interceptive Actions in Sport: Information and Movement (2002), Routledge, New York 40-63
59. Williams A.M., and Ericsson K.A. Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: some consideration when applying the expert performance approach. Hum. Mov. Sci. 24 (2005) 283-307