Effects of the interstimulus interval on somatosensory go/no-go event-related potentials

NeuroReport

Volumn 21, Issue 16, 2010, Pages 1040-1044

  Nakata, Hiroki ^a,b   Sakamoto, Kiwako ^a   Kakigi, Ryusuke ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^b WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

go no go; inter stimulus interval; no go potentials; response inhibition; tactile

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SOMATOSENSORY STIMULATION;

ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOUCH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78049245384     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32833f7bb5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Pfefferbaum A, Ford JM, Weller BJ, Kopell BS. ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 60:423-434.
2. Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/No go tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychol 1999; 101:267-291.
3. Nakata H, Inui K, Nishihira Y, Hatta A, Sakamoto M, Kida T, et al. Effects of a go/no go task on event-related potentials following somatosensory stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115:361-368.
4. Nakata H, Inui K, Wasaka T, Tamura Y, Kida T, Kakigi R. Effects of ISI and stimulus probability on event-related go/no go potentials after somatosensory stimulation. Exp Brain Res 2005; 162:293-299.
5. Nakata H, Inui K, Wasaka T, Akatsuka K, Kakigi R. Somato-motor inhibitory processing in humans: a study with MEG and ERP. Eur J Neurosci 2005; 22:1784-1792.
6. Hatem SM, Plaghki L, Mouraux A. How response inhibition modulates nociceptive and nonnociceptive somatosensory brain-evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 118:1503-1516.
7. Nakata H, Sakamoto K, Inui K, Hoshiyama M, Kakigi R. The characteristics of no-go potentials with intraepidermal stimulation. Neuro Report 2009; 20:1149-1154.
8. Picton TW, Stuss DT. The component structure of the human event-related potential. In: Kornhuber HH, Deecke L, editors. Motivation, motor, and sensory process of the brain, progress in brain research. Vol. 54. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press; 1980. pp. 17-49.
9. Fitzgerald PG, Picton TW. Temporal and sequential probability in evoked potential studies. Can J Psychol 1981; 35:188-200.
10. Polich J, Brock T, Geisler MW. P300 from auditory and somatosensory stimuli: probability and inter-stimulus interval. Int J Psychophysiol 1991; 11:219-223.
11. Gonsalvez CJ, Polich J. P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval. Psychophysiology 2002; 39:388-396.
12. Recio G, Schacht A, Sommer W. Effects of interstimulus interval on skin conductance responses and event-related potentials in a Go/NoGo task. Biol Psychol 2009; 80:246-250.
13. Jodo E, Kayama Y. Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 82:477-482.
14. Johnstone SJ, Pleffer CB, Barry RJ, Clarke AR, Smith JL. Development of inhibitory processing during the Go/NoGo task: a behavioral and event-related potential study of children and adults. J Psychophysiol 2005; 19:11-23.
15. Inui K, Tran TD, Qiu Y, Wang X, Hoshiyama M, Kakigi R. A comparative magnetoencephalographic study of cortical activations evoked by noxious and innocuous somatosensory stimulations. Neuroscience 2003; 120:235-248.
16. Kida T, Wasaka T, Inui K, Akatsuka K, Nakata H, Kakigi R. Centrifugal regulation of human cortical responses to a task-relevant somatosensory signal triggering voluntary movement. NeuroImage 2006; 32:1355-1364. (Pubitemid 44278689)
17. Knight RT, Cabini D, Woods DL, Clayworth CC. Contributions of temporal-parietal junction to the human auditory P3. Brain Res 1989; 502:109-116.
18. Tarkka IM, Micheloyannis S, Stokić DS. Generators for human P300 elicited by somatosensory stimuli using multiple dipole source analysis. Neuroscience 1996; 75:275-287.
19. Bledowski C, Prvulovic D, Hoechstetter K, Scherg M, Wibral M, Goebel R, Linden DE. Localizing P300 generators in visual target and distractor processing: a combined event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 2004; 24:9353-9360.
20. Polich J. P300, probability, and interstimulus interval. Psychophysiology 1990; 27:396-403.
21. Doucet C, Stelmack MR. The effect of response execution on P3 latency, reaction time, and movement time. Psychophysiology 1999; 36:351-363.
22. Kutas M, McCarthy G, Donchin E. Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science 1977; 197:792-795.
23. Kamijo K, Nishihira Y, Hatta A, Kaneda T, Wasaka T, Kida T, Kuroiwa K. Differential influences of exercise intensity on information processing in the central nervous system. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004; 92:305-311.
24. Roth WT, Ford JM, Kopell BS. Long-latency evoked potentials and reaction time. Psychophysiology 1978; 15:17-23.