Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: The roles of activation and inhibition

Psychological Research

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 266-279

  Band, Guido P H ^a   Ridderinkhof, K Richard ^a,b   Van der Molen, Maurits W ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN CORTEX; COLOR VISION; CONFLICT; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; NERVE TRACT; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; THALAMUS;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COLOR PERCEPTION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; NEURAL PATHWAYS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; THALAMUS;

EID: 1442280604     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-002-0127-0     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Band, G. P. H. & Van Boxtel, G. J. M. (1999). Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. Acta Psychologica, 101, 179-211.
2. Bruin, K. J., Wijers, A. A., & Van Staveren, A. S. J. (2001). Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition? Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 1660-1671.
3. Brunia, C. H. M. (1993). Waiting in readiness: gating in attention and motor preparation. Psychophysiology, 30, 327-339.
4. Brunia, C. H. M. & Vingerhoets, A. J. (1980). CNV and EMG preceding a plantar flexion of the foot. Biological Psychology, 11, 181-191.
5. Burle, B., Possamaï, C.-A., Vidai, F., Bonnet, M., & Hasbroucq, T. (2002). Executive control in the Simon effect: an electromyographic and distributional analysis. Psychological Research, 66, 324-336.
6. Coles, M. G. H. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251-269.
7. De Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1988). Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 682-692.
8. De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
9. De Jong, R., Coles, M. G. H., & Logan, G. D. (1995). Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 498-511.
10. Di Lazzaro, V., Oliviero, A., Profice, P., Insola, A., Mazzone, P., Tonali, P., & Rothwell, J. C. (1999). Direct demonstration of interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex produced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Experimental Brain Research, 124, 520-524.
11. Eimer, M. (1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioural performance. Acta Psychologica, 101, 293-313.
12. Eimer, M. & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737-1747.
13. Eimer, M. & Schlaghecken, F. (2001). Partial response activation to masked primes is not dependent on response readiness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92, 208-222.
14. Falkenstein, M., Koshlykova, N. A., Kiroj, V. N., Hoormann, J., & Hohnsbein, J. (1995). Late ERP components in visual and auditory go/nogo tasks. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 96, 36-43.
15. Gaillard, A. W. K. & Perdok, J. (1980). Slow brain potentials in the CNV-paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 44, 147-163.
16. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and post-stimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331-344.
17. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506.
18. Heil, M., Osman, A., Wiegelmann, J., Rolke, B., & Hennighausen, E. (2000). N200 in the Eriksen-task: inhibitory executive process? Journal of Psychophysiology, 14, 218-225.
19. Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280-290.
20. JaZZZ;kowski, P., Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Wauschkuhn, B., Wascher, E., & Verleger, R. (2000). The influence of time pressure and cue validity on response force in an S1-S2 paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 105, 89-105.
21. Jodo, E. & Kayama, Y. (1992). Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a go/no-go task. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology, 82, 477-482.
22. Kok, A. (1986). Effects of degradation of visual stimuli on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/no-go reaction tasks. Biological Psychology, 23, 21-38.
23. Kopp, B., Mattler, U., Goertz, R., & Rist, F. (1996b). N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a no-go task involving selective response priming. Eleclroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 99, 19-27.
24. Kopp, B., Rist, F., & Mattler, U. (1996a). N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiology, 33, 282-294.
25. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility. A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
26. Kornhuber, H. H. & Deecke, L. (1965). Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Wilkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente Potentiale. Pflügers Archives für die gesamte Physiologie, 248, 1-17.
27. Leuthold, H., Sommer, W., & Ulrich, R. (1996). Partial advance information and response preparation: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 307-323.
28. Logan, G. D. & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295-327.
29. Miller, J. (1998). Effects of stimulus-response probability on choice reaction time: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1521-1534.
30. Miller, J. & Hackley, S. A. (1992). Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 195-209.
31. Miller, J., Schäffer, R., & Hackley, S. A. (1991). Effects of preliminary information in a go versus no-go task. Acta Psychologica, 76, 241-292.
32. Niemi, P. & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133-162.
33. Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., Van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/nogo task: effects of response conflict and trial-type frequency. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (in press).
34. Norman, D. & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behaviour. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.) Consciousness and self-regulation, Vol. 4. New York: Plenum Press.
35. Osman, A. M., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E., & Meyer, D. E. (1992). On the transmission of partial information: inferences from movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 217-232.
36. Osman, A., Lou, L., Muller-Gethmann, H., Rinkenauer, G., Mattes, S., & Ulrich, R. (2000). Mechanisms of speed-accuracy tradeoff: evidence from covert motor processes. Biological Psychology, 51, 173-199.
37. Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In B. Kantowitz (Ed.) Human information processing: tutorials in performance and cognition, (pp. 41-82). Potomac MD, Lawerence Erlbaum.
38. Pfefferbaum, A., Ford, J. M., Weller, B. J., & Kopell, B. S. (1985). ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 60, 423-444.
39. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002a). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action. Attention & Performance, Vol. XIX. (pp. 494-519). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002b). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66, 312-323.
41. Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Van der Molen, M. W. (1995). When global information and local information collide: a brain-potential analysis of the locus of interference effects. Biological Psychology, 41, 29-53.
42. Ridderinkhof, K. R., Van der Molen, M. W., & Bashore, T. R. (1995). Limits on the application of additive factors logic: violations of stage robustness suggest a dual-process architecture to explain flanker effects on target processing. Acta Psychologica, 90, 29-48.
43. Ridderinkhof, K. R., Band, G. P. H., & Logan, G. D. (1999). A study of adaptive behavior: effects of age and irrelevant information on the ability to inhibit one's actions. Acta Psychologica, 101, 315-337.
44. Rohrbaugh, J. W. & Gaillard, A. W. K. (1983). Sensory and motor aspects of the contingent negative variation. In A. W. K. Gaillard & W. Ritter (Eds.) Tutorials in event-related potentials research: endogenous components (pp. 269-310). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
45. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444-474.
46. Sangals, J., Sommer, W., & Leuthold, H. (2002). Influences of presentation mode and time pressure on the utilisation of advance information in response preparation. Acta Psychologica, 109, 1-24.
47. Sasaki, K., Gemba, H., & Tsujimoto, T. (1989). Suppression of visually initiated hand movement by stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in the monkey. Brain Research, 495, 100-107.
48. Shimamura, A. P. (1995). Memory and frontal lobe function. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (pp. 803-813). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Tecce, J.J. (1972). Contingent negative variation (CNV) and psychological processes in man. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 73-108.
50. Ulrich, R., Leuthold, H., & Sommer, W. (1998). Motor programming of response force and movement direction. Psychophysiology, 35, 721-728.
51. Van Boxtel, G. J. M. (1994). Non-motor components of slow brain potentials. Tilburg, The Netherlands. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis.
52. Van Boxtel, G. J. M. & Brunia, C. H. M. (1994). Motor and non-motor aspects of slow brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 38, 37-51.
53. Van Boxtel G.J.M., Van der Molen, M.W., Jennings, J.R., & Brunia, C.H.M. (2001). A psychophysiological analysis of inhibitory motor control in the stop-signal paradigm. Biological Psychology, 58, 229-262.
54. Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., JaZZZ;kowski, P., Wauschkuhn, B., & Verleger, R. (2001). Influence of time pressure in a simple response task, a choice-by-location task, and the Simon task. Journal of Psychophysiology, 15, 241-255.
55. Verleger, R., Wauschkuhn, B., Van der Lubbe, R., JaZZZjkowski, P., & Trillenberg, P. (2000). Posterior and anterior contribution of hand-movement preparation to late-CNV. Journal of Psychophysiology, 14, 69-86.
56. Wickelgren, W. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67-85.