Somatosensory N250 and P300 during discrimination tasks

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 275-283

  Kida, Tetsuo ^a   Nishihira, Yoshiaki ^a   Hatta, Arihiro ^a   Wasaka, Toshiaki ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

Active; Attention; N250; P300; Passive; Somatosensory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MEDIAN NERVE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; READING; STANDARD; STIMULUS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; WRIST;

EID: 0038204544     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8760(03)00021-7     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Baudena P., Halgren E., Heit G., Clarke J.M. Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. III. Frontal cortex. Electroen. Clin. Neuro. 94:1995;251-264.
2. Barrett G., Neshige R., Shibasaki H. Human auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: effects of response condition and age. Electroen. Clin. Neuro. 66:1987;409-419.
3. Clarke J.M., Halgren E., Chauvel P. Intracranial ERPs in humans during a lateralized visual oddball task; II. Temporal, parietal, and frontal recordings. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110:1999;1226-1244.
4. Desmedt J.E. P300 in serial tasks: an essential post-decision closure mechanism. Prog. Brain Res. 54:1980;682-686.
5. Desmedt J.E., Tomberg C. Mapping early somatosensory evoked potentials in selective attention: critical evaluation of control conditions used for titrating by difference the cognitive P30, P100 and N140. Electroen. Clin. Neuro. 74:1989;321-346.
6. Donchin E., Coles M.G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav. Brain Sci. 100:1988;357-374.
7. Halgren E., Baudena P., Clarke J.M., et al. Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. I. Superior temporal plane and parietal lobe. Electroen. Clin. Neuro. 94:1995;191-220.
8. Halgren E., Baudena P., Clarke J.M., et al. Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. II. Medial, lateral and posterior temporal lobe. Electroen. Clin. Neuro. 94:1995;229-250.
9. Halgren E., Marinkovic K., Chauvel P. Generators of the late cognitive potentials in auditory and visual oddball tasks. Electroen. Clin. Neuro. 106:1998;156-164.
10. Ito J., Shibasaki H., Kimura J. Somatosensory event-related potentials following different stimulus conditions. Int. J. Neurosci. 65:1992;239-246.
11. Johnson R. Jr. A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology. 23:1986;367-384.
12. Josiassen R.C., Shagass C., Roemer R.A., Ercegovac D.V., Straumanis J.J. Somatosensory evoked potential changes with a selective attention task. Psychophysiology. 19:1982;146-159.
13. Katayama J., Polich J. Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b. Psychophysiology. 35:1996;23-33.
14. Kekoni J., Hämäläinen H., McCloud V., Reinekainen K., Näätänen R. Is the somatosensory N250 related to deviance discrimination or conscious target detection? Electroen. Clin. Neuro. 100:1996;115-125.
15. Kekoni J., Hämäläinen H., Mikael S., et al. Rate effect and mismatch responses in the somatosensory system: ERP-recordings in humans. Biol. Psychol. 46:1997;125-142.
16. Kramer A.F., Strayer D.L. Assessing the development of automatic processing: an application of dual-track and event-related brain potential methodologies. Biol. Psychol. 26:1988;231-367.
17. Kropotov J.D., Näätänen R., Sevostianov A.V., Alho K., Reinikainen K., Kropotova O.V. Mismatch negativity to auditory stimulus change recorded directly from the human temporal cortex. Psychophysiology. 32:1995;418-422.
18. Kujala T., Alho K., Kekoni J., et al. Auditory and somatosensory event-related brain potentials in blind humans. Exp. Brain Res. 104:1995;519-526.
19. Kutas M., McCarthy G., Donchin E. Augumenting mental chronometry: the P3 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science. 197:1977;792-795.
20. McCarthy G., Donchin E. A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science. 211:1981;77-80.
21. McCarthy G., Wood C.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroen. Clin. Neuro. 62:1985;203-208.
22. Mertens R., Polich J. P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: passive versus active tasks and stimulus modality. Electroen. Clin. Neuro. 104:1997;488-497.
23. Näätänen R. Attention and Brain Function. 1992;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
24. Novak G.P., Ritter W., Vaughan H.G. Jr., Wiznitzer M.L. Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task. Electroen. Clin. Neuro. 75:1990;255-275.
25. Polich J. Response mode and P300 from auditory stimuli. Biol. Psychol. 25:1987;61-71.
26. Pfefferbaum A., Ford J., Johnson R. Manipulation of P3 latency: speed vs. accuracy instructions. Electroen. Clin. Neuro. 55:1983;188-197.
27. Ritter W., Simson R., Vaughan H.G. Jr. Association cortex potentials and reaction time in auditory discrimination. Electroen. Clin. Neuro. 33:1972;547-555.
28. Ritter W., Simson R., Vaughan H.G. Jr. A brain event related to the making of a sensory discrimination. Science. 203:1979;1358-1361.
29. Renault B., Rogot R., Lesevre N. Onset and offset of brain events as indices of mental chronometry. Science. 215:1982;1413-1415.
30. Schubert M., Johannes S., Koch M. Differential effects of two motor tasks on ERPs in an auditory classification task: evidence of shared cognitive resources. Neurosci. Res. 30:1998;125-134.
31. Simson R., Vaughan H.G. Jr., Ritter W. The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual discrimination tasks. Electroen. Clin. Neuro. 42:1977;528-535.
32. Smith M.E., Halgren E., Sokolik M., et al. The intracranial topography of the P3 event-related potential elicited during auditory oddball. Electroen. Clin. Neuro. 76:1990;235-248.
33. Starr A., Sandroni P., Michalewski H.J. Readiness to respond in a target detection task: pre- and post-stimulus event-related potentials in normal subjects. Electroen. Clin. Neuro. 96:1995;76-92.
34. Starr A., Aguinaldo M., Roe H.J., Michalewski H.J. Sequential changes of auditory processing during target detection: motor responding versus mental counting. Electroen. Clin. Neuro. 105:1997;201-212.
35. Verleger R. On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology. 34:1997;131-156.
36. Wickens C., Kramer A., Vanasse L., Donchin E. The performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information processing resources. Science. 221:1983;1080-1082.