Scientific collaboration in Library and Information Science viewed through the Web of Knowledge: The Spanish case

Scientometrics

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 877-890

  Ardanuy, Jordi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Co authorship; Library and Information Science; Scientific collaboration

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856545880     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0552-1     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2011). The relationship between scientists' research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research. Scientometrics, 86(3), 629-643.
2. Ardanuy, J., Urbano, C., & Quintana, L. (2009). A citation analysis of Catalan literary studies (1974-2003): Towards a bibliometrics of humanistic studies in minority languages. Scientometrics, 81(2), 347-366.
3. Avkiran, N. K. (1997). Scientific collaboration in finance does not lead to better quality research. Scientometrics, 39(2), 173-184.
4. Bahr, A. H., & Zemon, M. (2000). Collaborative authorship in the journal literature: Perspectives for academic librarians who wish to publish. College and Research Libraries, 61, 410-419.
5. Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. (2000). Collaboration networks in science. In B. Cronin & H. B. Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge: A festschrift in honour of Eugene Garfield (pp. 197-213). New Jersey: ASIS.
6. Bordons, M., Gómez, I., Fernández, M. T., Zulueta, M. A., & Méndez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and internationals scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, 37(2), 279-295.
7. Bourke, P. (1997). Discipline boundaries in the social sciences. Canberra: Academy of the Social Sciences.
8. Cano, V. (1999). Bibliometric overview of library and information science research in Spain. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(8), 675-680.
9. Chang, H.-W. (2009). A bibliometric analysis of Asian authorship pattern in JASIST 1981-2005. In Asia-Pacific conference on library & information education & practice. Tsukuba: Japan University of Tsukuba. http://www. slis. tsukuba. ac. jp/~atsushi/a-liep/proceedings/Papers/a31. pdf. Accessed 6 May 2011.
10. Cronin, B., Shaw, D., & La Barre, K. (2003). A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(9), 855-871.
11. Cronin, B., Shaw, D., & La Barre, K. (2004). Visible, less visible, and invisible work: Patterns of collaboration in 20th century chemistry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 160-168.
12. Ding, Y., Foo, S., & Chowdhury, G. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of collaboration in the field of information retrieval. The International Information & Library Review, 30, 367-376.
13. EC3. (2009). In-recs (índice de impacto de las Revistas Españolas de Ciencias Sociales). http://ec3. ugr. es/in-recs/ii/Documentacion-fecha-2009. htm. Accessed 6 May 2011.
14. Franceschet, M., & Costantini, A. (2010). The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of Informetrics, 4, 540-553.
15. Frías, J. A., & Romero-Gómez, P. (1998). ¿Quiénes son y qué citan los investigadores que publican en las revistas españolas de biblioteconomía y documentación? Anales de Documentación, 1, 29-53.
16. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: Wiley.
17. Glanzel, W. (2002). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50, 461-473.
18. Harman, G. (2001). University-industry research partnerships in Australia: Extent, benefits and risks. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(3), 245-264.
19. Harsanyi, M. A. (1993). Multiple authors, multiple problems-bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: A literature review. Library and Information Science Review, 15, 325-354.
20. Hart, R. L. (2007). Collaboration and article quality in the literature of academic librarianship. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(2), 190-195.
21. Iribarren-Maestro, I., Lascurain-Sánchez, M. L., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2009). Are multi-authorship and visibility related? Study of ten research areas at Carlos III University of Madrid. Scientometrics, 79(1), 191-200.
22. Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2002). L'aportació espanyola a la producció científica internacional en biblioteconomia i documentació, un balanç de deu anys (1992-2001). BiD. Textos universitaris en biblioteconomia i documentació, 9. http://www. ub. edu/bid/09jimen1. htm. Accessed 6 May 2011.
23. Jiménez-Contreras, E., Delgado-López-Cózar, E., & Ruiz-Pérez, R. (2006). Producción española en biblioteconomía y documentación con visibilidad internacional a través del Web of science (1995-2004). El professional de la información, 15(5), 373-383.
24. Jiménez-Contreras, E., & Moya-Anegón, F. (1997). Análisis de la autoría en revistas españolas de biblioteconomía y documentación. 1975-1995. Revista española de documentación científica, 20(3), 252-266.
25. Jiménez-Hidalgo, S. (2007). Análisis de la autoría en la Revista Española de Documentación Científica (1997-2005). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 30(3), 305-322.
26. Katz, J. S. (2000). Scale-independent indicators and research evaluation. Science and Public Policy, 27(1), 23-36.
27. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
28. Keat, Y. C., & Kaur, K. (2008). Citation study of library & information dissertations for collection development. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 13(2), 29-47. http://www. webpages. uidaho. edu/~mbolin/sudhier-dileepkumar. htm. Accessed 6 May 2011.
29. Lawani, S. M. (1986). Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics, 9(1-2), 13-25.
30. Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 434-442.
31. Loan-Clarke, J., & Preston, D. (2002). Tensions and benefits in collaborative research involving a university and another organization. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 169-185.
32. López-Gijón, J., Pérez López, A., & Ruiz de Villegas del Coso, M. (1995). Siete Jornadas Bibliotecarias de Andalucía, un análisis. In VIII Jornadas Bibliotecarias de Andalucía (pp. 89-112). Huelva: Diputación Provincial.
33. Molteni, V., & Zulueta, M. A. (2002). Análisis de la visibilidad internacional de la producción científica argentina en las Bases de datos Social Science Citation Index y Arts and Humanities Citation Index de 1990-2000: estudio bibliométrico. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 25(4), 455-465.
34. Mukherjee, B. (2010). Assessing Asian scholarly research in Library and Information Science: A quantitative view as reflected in "Web of Knowledge". The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(1), 90-101.
35. Naseer, M. M., & Mahmood, K. (2009). LIS research in Pakistan: An analysis of Pakistan Library and Information Science Journal 1998-2007. Library Philosophy and Practice. http://www. webpages. uidaho. edu/~mbolin/naseer-mahmood. htm. Accessed 9 March de 2011.
36. Nieminen, M., & Kaukonen, E. (2001). Universities and R& D networking in a knowledge-based economy: A glance at Finnish developments. Helsinki: Sitra. http://www. ub. es/bid/bid09. htm. Accessed 30 Aug 2011.
37. Ocholla, D. N., & Ocholla, L. (2007). Research in Library and Information Science in South Africa: An analysis of journal research output from 1993-2006. In World library and information congress, 73rd IFLA general conference and council, 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. http://archive. ifla. org/IV/ifla73/papers/132-Ocholla_Ocholla-en. pdf. Accessed 9 March 2011.
38. Rijnsoever, F., Hessels, L., & Vandeberg, R. L. J. (2008). A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers. Research Policy, 37(8), 1255-1266.
39. Santillán, E., & Valles, J. (2005). Contribución de la revista «Anales de documentación» a la ciencia de la información, panorama bibliométrico. Anales de documentación, 8, 237-246.
40. Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2008). Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? Scientometrics, 74(3), 361-377.
41. Wang, Y., Wu, Y. S., Pan, Y. T., Ma, Z., & Rousseau, R. (2005). Scientific collaboration in China as reflected in co-authorship. Scientometrics, 62(2), 183-198.
42. Yan, E., Ding, Y., & Zhu, Q. (2010). Mapping library and information science in China: A coauthorship network analysis. Scientometrics, 83(1), 115-131.
43. Yazit, N., & Zainab, A. N. (2007). Publication productivity of Malaysian authors and institutions in LIS. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 12(2), 35-55.