A citation analysis of Catalan literary studies (1974-2003): Towards a bibliometrics of humanities studies in minority languages

Scientometrics

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 347-366

  Ardanuy, Jordi ^a   Urbano, Cristóbal ^a   Quintana, LluíS ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956616556     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-008-2143-3     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. AKSNES, D. W. (2003), A macro study of self-citation, Scientometrics, 56: 235-246.
2. AL, U., SAHINER, M., TONTA, Y. (2006), Arts and Humanities Literature: bibliometric bharacteristics of bontributions by Turkish authors, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57: 1011-1022.
3. ARDANUY, J. (2008), Anàlisi bibliomètrica de la producció científica en literatura catalana, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona. Available online at: www.tesisenxarxa.net/TDX-0226108-124023/index.html, accessed on 20 May 2008.
4. BORGATTI, S. P., EVERETT, M. G., FREEMAN, L. C. (2002), Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis, Analytic Technologies, Harvard.
5. BUDD, J. (1986), Characteristics of written scholarship in American literature: A citation study, Library and Information Science Research, 8: 189-211.
6. CULLARS, J. (1985), Characteristics of the monographic literature of British and American literary studies, College and Research Libraries, 46: 511-522.
7. CULLARS, J. (1988), Characteristics of the monographic scholarship of foreign literary studies by native speakers of English, College and Research Libraries, 49: 157-170.
8. CULLARS J. (1989), Citation characteristics of French and German literary monographs, Library Quarterly, 59: 305-325.
9. CULLARS, J. (1990), Citation characteristics of Italian and Spanish literary monographs, Library Quarterly, 60: 337-356.
10. CULLARS, J. (1992), Citation characteristics of monographs in the fine arts, Library Quarterly, 62: 325-342.
11. CULLARS, J. (1996), Citation characteristics of French and German fine arts monographs, Library Quarterly, 66: 138-160.
12. CULLARS, J. (1998), Citation characteristics of English language monographs in philosophy, Library and Information Science Research, 20: 41-68.
13. DURAN, E. (coord.) (2004), Reports de la recerca a Catalunya. 1996-2002 filologia catalana: literatura, Institut d'Estudis Catalans, Barcelona. Available online at: www2.iecat.net/gc/digitalAssets /3701_1097665504296_litcat9602.pdf, accessed on 20 May 2008.
14. ELLIS, D., OLDMAN, H. (2005), The English literature researcher in the age of the internet, Journal of Information Science, 31: 29-36.
15. FERNÁNDEZ-IZQUIERDO, F., ROMÁN, A., RUBIO-LINIERS, M. C., MORENO, F. J., MARTÍN-MORENO, C., GARCÍA-ZORITA, J. C.; LASCURAIN, M. L., GARCÍA, P. E., POVEDANO, E., SANZ, E. (2007), Bibliometric study of early Modern History in Spain based on bibliographic references in national scientific journals and conference proceedings. In: D. TORRES-SALINAS, H. F. MOED (Eds), 11 International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. CSIC, Madrid, vol. 1, pp. 266-271.
16. GARFIELD, E. (1980), Is information retrieval in the arts and humanities inherently different from that in science? The effect that ISI's citation index for the arts and humanities is expected to have on future scholarship, Library Quarterly, 50: 40-57.
17. GEORGAS, H.; CULLARS, J. (2005), A citation study of the characteristics of the linguistics literature, College and Research Libraries, 66: 496-515.
18. GLÄNZEL, W., THIJS, B. (2004), The influence of author self-citationson bibliometric macro indicators, Scientometrics, 59: 281-310.
19. GLÄNZEL, W., THIJS, B., SCHLEMMER, B. (2004), A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citationsin scientific communication, Scientometrics, 59: 63-77.
20. GLEAVES, E. S. (1961), Characteristics of the Research Materials Used by Scholars Who Write in Journals in the Field of American Literature., ACRL Microcard, 130, University of Rochester Press, Rochester.
21. HEINZKILL, R. (1980), Characteristics of references in selected scholarly English literary journals, Library Quarterly, 50: 352-365.
22. HERUBEL, J. P., BUCHANAN, A. L. (1994), Characteristics of references in selected scholarly English journals, Collection Management, 18: 89-137.
23. JONES, C., CHAPMAN, M., WOODS, P. C. (1972), The characteristics of the literature used by historians, Journal of Librarianship, 4: 137-156.
24. KAMADA, T., KAWAI, S. (1989), An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs, Information Processing Letters, 31: 7-15.
25. KREUZMAN, H. (2001), A co-citation analysis of representative authors in philosophy: Examining the relationship between epistemologists and philosophers of science, Scientometrics, 51: 525-539.
26. LINDHOLM-ROMANTSCHUK, Y., WARNER, J. (1996), The role of monographs in scholarly communication: An empirical study of philosophy, sociology and economics, Journal of Documentation, 52 (4): 389-404.
27. LOTKA, A. J. (1926), The frequency distribution of scientific productivity, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16: 317-323.
28. LOWE, M. S. (2003), Reference analysis of the 'American Historical Review', Collection Building, 22: 13-20.
29. MCCAIN, K. W. (1987), Citation patterns in the history of technology, Library and Information Science Research, 9: 41-59.
30. MOLAS, J. (coord.) (2001), Reports de la Recerca a Catalunya. Literatura catalana, Institut d'Estudis Catalans, Barcelona. Available online at: www2.iecat.net/gc/digitalAssets /3686_1097661647515_literatura.pdf, accessed on 20 May 2008.
31. MOLTENI, V., ZULUETA, M. A. (2002), Análisis de la visibilidad internacional de la producción científica argentina en las Bases de datos Social Science Citation Index y Arts and Humanities Citation Index de 1990-2000, Revista Española de Documentacion Cientifica, 25: 455-465.
32. NEDERHOF, A. J. (2006), Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A review, Scientometrics, 66: 81-100.
33. NEDERHOF, A. J., ERLINGS, C. M. (1993), A Bibliometric Study of Productivity and Impact of Modern Language and Literature Research in the Netherlands, 1982-1991, Center for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden.
34. NEDERHOF, A. J., NOYONS, E. C. M. (1992), International comparison of departments' research performance in the humanities, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 43: 249-256.
35. NEDERHOF, A. J., ZWAAN, R. A, BRUIN, P. J. DE, DEKKER, P. J. (1989), Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social and behavioural sciences: A comparative study, Scientometrics, 15: 423-435.
36. NEWBY, G. B., GREENBERG, J., JONES, P. (2003), Open source software development and Lotka's law: Bibliometric patterns in programming. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54: 169-178.
37. PRICE, D. J. D. (1970), Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology and nonscience. In: C. E. NELSON, D. K. POLLOCK (Eds), Communication among Scientists and Engineers. Heat, Lexington.
38. SHAW, W. (2002), The Use of the Internet by Academics in the Discipline of English Literature: A Quantitative and Qualitative Approach, University of Wales, Aberystwyth.
39. SMALL, H., SWEENEY, E. (1985), Clustering the science citation index using co-citations I: A comparison of methods, Scientometrics, 7: 391-409.
40. SMALL, H., SWEENEY, E., GREENLEE, E. (1985). Clustering the science citation index using co-citations II: Mapping science. Scientometrics, 8: 321-340.
41. STERN, M. (1983), Characteristics of the literature of literary scholarship, College and Research Libraries, 44: 199-209.
42. STINSON, E. R., LANCASTER, F. W. (1987), Synchronous versus diachronous methods in the measurement of obsolescence by citation studies, Journal of Information Science, 13: 65-74.
43. STONE, SUE (1982), Progress in documentation. Humanities scholars: Information needs and uses, Journal of Documentation, 38: 292-313.
44. THOMPSON, J. W. (2002), The Death of the Scholarly Monograph in the Humanities? Citation Patterns in Literay Scholarship, Libri 52: 121-136.
45. URBANO, C. (2000), El análisis de citas en publicaciones de usuarios de bibliotecas universitarias: estudio de tesis doctorales en infomática de la Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, 1996-1998, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona. Available online at: www.tesisenxarxa.net/TDX-0614102-113014/index.html, accessed on 20 May 2008.
46. URBANO, C., BORREGO A., BRUCART, J. M., COSCULLUELA, A.; SOMOZA, M. (2005), Análisis bibliométrico de la bibliografía citada en estudios de filología espanyola, Revista Española de Documentacion Cientifica, 28: 439-461.
47. URBANO, C., BORREGO, A., RODRÍGUEZ-GAIRÍN, J. M., ARDANUY, J., BRUCART, J. M., COSCULLUELA, A., GUARDIOLA, E., PONS, A., SOMOZA, M. (2004), La evaluación de revistas en procesos de evaluación de la investigación española en humanidades y ciencias sociales: desarrollo de un modelo y experimentación en el área de filología hispánica. Informe EA2004-00025 del Programa de Estudios y Análisis del MEC, Ministerio de Educación i Ciencia, Madrid. Available online at: www.mec.es/univ/html/informes/estudios_analisis/resultados_2004/ea0025/ea0025.pdf, accessed on 20 May 2008.
48. WATSON-BOONE, R. (1994), Information needs and habits of humanities scholars, Reference Quarterly, 34: 203-216.
49. ZAINAB, A. N., GOI, S. S. (1997), Characteristics of citations used by humanities researchers, Malaysia Journal of Library & Information Science, 2: 19-36.
50. ZWAAN, R. A; NEDERHOF, A. J. (1990), Some aspects of scholarly communication in linguistics: An empirical study, Language, 66: 523-527.