Modelling Phytophthora disease risk in Austrocedrus chilensis forests of Patagonia

European Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 131, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 323-337

  la Manna, L ^a,b   Matteucci, S D ^b,c   Kitzberger, T ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LA PATAGONIA SAN JUAN BOSCO   (Argentina)

^b Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^d UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL COMAHUE   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Abiotic factors; Logistic regression; Mahalanobis distance; Mal del cipr s; Maxent; Risk model

Indexed keywords

DISEASE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; EUKARYOTE; LANDSCAPE; MANAGEMENT; NUMERICAL MODEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK FACTOR;

PATAGONIA;

AUSTROCEDRUS CHILENSIS; PHYTOPHTHORA;

EID: 84856539987     PISSN: 16124669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10342-011-0503-7     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Baccalá N, Rosso P, Havrylenko M (1998) Austrocedrus chilensis mortality in the Nahuel Huapi National Park (Argentina). For Ecol Manage 109: 261-269.
2. Bergot M, Cloppet E, Pérarnaud V, Déqué M, Marçais B, Desprez-Loustau ML (2004) Simulation of potential range expansion of oak disease caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi under climate change. Glob Change Biol 10(9): 1539-1552.
3. Brasier CM (1996) Phytophthora cinnamomi and oak decline in southern Europe. Environmental constraints including climate change. Ann For Sci 53: 347-358.
4. Brotons L, Thuiller W, Araújo M, Hirzel A (2004) Presence-absence versus presence-only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability. Ecography 27: 437-448.
5. 2(k) to formulate a GIS-based model of timber rattlesnake hibernacula. J Wildl Manage 69(1): 33-44.
6. Calí SG (1996) Austrocedrus chilensis: estudio de los anillos de crecimiento y su relación con la dinámica del "mal del ciprés" en el Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi, Argentina. Thesis, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Bariloche, Argentina.
7. Colmet Dâage F, Lanciotti ML, Marcolín A (1995) Importancia forestal de los suelos volcánicos de la Patagonia Norte y Central. Available from Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Bariloche, p 28.
8. DeVries RJ (2005) Spatial Modelling using the Mahalanobis statistic: two examples from the discipline of plant geography. In: Zerger A, Argent RM (eds) Proceedings of the international congress on modelling and simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, pp 1368-1374.
9. Díaz-Vaz J (1985) Austrocedrus chilensis. Descripción anatómica. Bosque 6(1): 49-50.
10. Eckert S, Leuggern AG (2006) A contribution to sustainable forest management in Patagonia. Object-oriented classification and forest parameter extraction based on ASTER and Landsat ETM+ data. Thesis, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät, Universität Zürich.
11. El Mujtar V (2009) Análisis integrado de factores genéticos, bióticos y abióticos para la formulación de una nueva hipótesis sobre la etiología del "mal del ciprés". Doctoral thesis, Universidad Nacional de la Plata, La Plata, Argentina.
12. Elith J, Graham C, Anderson R et al (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29: 129-151.
13. Erwin DC, Ribeiro OK (1996) Phytophthora diseases worldwide. APS Press, St. Paul.
14. Fielding AH, Bell J (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24: 38-49.
15. Gibbs JN, Lipscombe MA, Peace AJ (2008) The impact of Phytophthora disease on riparian populations of common alder (Alnus glutinosa) in southern Britain. Eur J For Pathol 29(1): 39-50.
16. Giraut M, Ludueña S, Postiglioni A, Rey C, Dente V, Sol I (2002) Atlas digital de los recursos hídricos superficiales de la República Argentina. INA, Subsec. Recursos Hídricos, Presidencia de la Nación. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
17. Gobbi M (1999) Austrocedrus chilensis management: effects on microsites and regeneration. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 25: 71-83.
18. Gobbi M, Schlichter T (1998) Survival of Austrocedrus chilensis seedlings in relation to microsite conditions and forest thinning. For Ecol Manage 111: 137-146.
19. Greslebin AG, Hansen EM (2009) The decline of Austrocedrus forests in Patagonia (Mal del Ciprés): another Phytophthora-caused forest disease. In: Goheen EM, Frankel SJ (eds) Proceedings of the fourth meeting of the International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO) Working Party S07. 02. 09, Phytophthoras in forests and natural ecosystems. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.
20. Greslebin AG, Hansen EM (2010) Pathogenicity of Phytophthora austrocedrae on Austrocedrus chilensis and its relation with "Mal del Ciprés" in Patagonia. Plant Pathol 59(4): 604-612.
21. Greslebin AG, Hansen E, Sutton W (2007) Phytophthora austrocedrae sp. nov., a new species associated with Austrocedrus chilensis mortality in Patagonia (Argentina). Mycol Res 11(3): 308-316.
22. Hansen EM, Goheen DJ, Jules ES, Ullian B (2000) Managing Port-Orford-cedar and the introduced pathogen Phytophtora lateralis. Plant Dis 84: 4-14.
23. Hellgren EC, Bales SL, Gregory MS, Leslie DM, Clark JD (2007) Testing a Mahalanobis distance model of black bear habitat use in the Ouachita Mountains of Oklahoma. J Wildl Manage 71(3): 924-928.
24. Hernández P, Graham C, Master L, Albert D (2006) The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modelling methods. Ecography 29: 773-785.
25. Irisarri J (2000) La propuesta de reclasificación de los Andepts de Argentina, de acuerdo al Orden Andisoles. In: Proceedings of the workshop soil taxonomy, INTA, AICET, AACS, Buenos Aires.
26. Irisarri J, Mendía J, Roca C, Buduba C, Valenzuela F, Epele F, Fraseto F, Ostertag G, Bobadilla S, Andenmatten E (1995) Zonificación de las tierras para la aptitud forestal de la Provincia del Chubut. Available from Dirección General de Bosques y Parques de la Provincia del Chubut. Digital format.
27. Jenness J (2003) Mahalanobis distances (mahalanobis. avx) extension for ArcView 3. x, Jenness Enterprises. Available from: http://www. jennessent. com/arcview/mahalanobis. htm. Accessed Dec 2008.
28. Johnson CJ, Gillingham MP (2005) An evaluation of mapped species distribution models used for conservation planning. Environ Conserv 32(2): 1-12.
29. La Manna L (2005) Caracterización de los suelos bajo bosque de Austrocedrus chilensis a través de un gradiente climático y topográfico en Chubut, Argentina. Bosque 26(2): 137-153.
30. La Manna L, Rajchenberg M (2004a) The decline of Austrocedrus chilensis forests in Patagonia, Argentina: soil features as predisposing factors. For Ecol Manage 190: 345-357.
31. La Manna L, Rajchenberg M (2004b) Soil properties and Austrocedrus chilensis decline in Central Patagonia, Argentina. Plant Soil 263: 29-41.
32. La Manna L, Mateucci SD, Kitzberger T (2008a) Abiotic factors related to the incidence of Austrocedrus chilensis disease at a landscape scale. For Ecol Manage 256: 1087-1095.
33. La Manna L, Buduba C, Irisarri J (2008b) Los Suelos del Valle 16 de Octubre, Provincia del Chubut. Patagonia For 14(2): 13-16.
34. La Manna L, Carabelli F, Gómez M, Matteucci SD (2008c) Disposición espacial de parches de Austrocedrus chilensis con síntomas de defoliación y mortalidad en el Valle 16 de Octubre (Chubut, Argentina). Bosque 29(1): 23-32.
35. Liu C, Berry P, Dawson T, Pearson R (2005) Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography 28: 385-393.
36. Loguercio G, Burschel P, Rey M (1999) El bosque de Ciprés de la Cordillera: su conservación y uso. Available from Centro de Investigación y Extensión Forestal Andino Patagónico, Folleto de divulgación 14, Esquel, Chubut, p 22.
37. Loiselle B, Howell C, Graham C, Goerck J, Brooks T, Smith K, Williams P (2003) Avoiding pitfalls of using species-distribution models in conservation planning. Conserv Biol 17(6): 1-10.
38. Manel S, Williams HC, Ormerod SJ (2001) Evaluating presences-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. J Appl Ecol 38: 921-931.
39. Marsden S, Fielding A (1999) Habitat associations of parrots on the Wallacean islands of Buru, Seram and Sumba. J Biogeogr 26: 439-446.
40. Meentemeyer R, Rizzo D, Mark W, Lotz E (2004) Mapping the risk of establishment and spread of sudden oak death in California. For Ecol Manage 200: 195-214.
41. Mundo IA, El Mujtar VA, Perdomo MH, Gallo LA, Villalba R, Barrera MD (2010) Austrocedrus chilensis growth decline in relation to drought events in northern Patagonia, Argentina. Trees Struct Funct 24(3): 561-570.
42. Núñez M (2009) Cambio climático en Argentina: proyecciones con el uso de modelos físico-matemáticos. In: Castillo Marín N (ed) El cambio climático en Argentina. Secretaría de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable, Buenos Aires.
43. Pastorino M, Fariña M, Bran D, Gallo L (2006) Extremos geográficos de la distribución natural de Austrocedrus chilensis (Cupressaceae). Bol Soc Argent Bot 41: 307-311.
44. Pearce J, Ferrier S (2000) Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecol Model 133: 225-245.
45. Pearson R, Thuiller W, Araujo M, Martinez-Meyer E, Brotons L, McClean C, Miles L, Segurado P, Dawson T, Lees D (2006) Model-based uncertainty in species range prediction. J Biogeogr 33: 1704-1711.
46. Pearson R, Raxworthy C, Nakamura M, Townsend P (2007) Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. J Biogeogr 34: 102-117.
47. Phillips S, Dudík M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31: 161-175.
48. Phillips S, Anderson R, Schapired R (2005) Maxent software for species distribution modeling. Available on: http://www. cs. princeton. edu/_schapire/maxent.
49. Phillips S, Anderson R, Schapired R (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190: 231-259.
50. Raffaele E, Gobbi ME (1996) Seed bank composition and variability in Austrocedrus chilensis forest sites in Patagonia. Argent Int J Ecol Env Sci 22: 59-72.
51. Ramsey F, Schafer D (1997) The statistical Sleuth: a course in methods of data analysis. Duxbury Press, Belmond.
52. Relva M, Westerholm C, Kitzberger T (2008) Effects of introduced ungulates on forest understory communities in northern Patagonia are modified by timing and severity of stand mortality. Plant Ecol 201(1): 11-22.
53. Rotenberry JT, Preston KL, Knick ST (2006) GIS-based niche modeling for mapping species' habitat. Ecology 87(6): 1458-1464.
54. Schadt S, Revilla E, Wiegand T, Knauer F, Kaczensky P, Breitenmoser U, Bufka L, Červený J, Koubek P, Huber T, Staniša C, Trepl L (2002) Assessing the suitability of central European landscapes for the reintroduction of Eurasian lynx. J Appl Ecol 39: 189-203.
55. Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of classification for making and interpreting soil surveys, 2nd edn. Agriculture Handbook 436. Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
56. Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240: 1285-1293.
57. Varsavsky E, Bettucci L, Rodríguez D, Gómez C (1975) Observaciones preliminares sobre la mortalidad del ciprés (Austrocedrus chilensis) en los bosques patagónicos. Pub. Fund. Bariloche No. 19, Bariloche, p 11.
58. Veblen TT, Burns BR, Kitzberger T, Lara A, Villalba R (1995) The ecology of the conifers of southern South America. In: Enright NS, Hill RS (eds) Ecology of the southern conifers. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, pp 120-155.
59. Venette RC, Cohen SD (2006) Potential climatic suitability for establishment of Phytophthora ramorum within the contiguous United States. For Ecol Manage 231: 18-26.
60. Zobel DB, Roth LF, Hawk GM (1985) Ecology, pathology, and management of Port-Orford-cedar (Chamaecyparis lawsoniana). General Technical Report PNW-184. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR, p 161.