Keratin 13 immunostaining in corneal impression cytology for the diagnosis of limbal stem cell deficiency

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 9411-9415

  Poli, Muriel ^a   Janin, Hélène ^a   Justin, Virginie ^a   Auxenfans, Celine ^a   Burillon, Carole ^a   Damour, Odile ^a  

^a EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOKERATIN 12; CYTOKERATIN 13; CYTOKERATIN 19; CYTOKERATIN 3; BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CELL DENSITY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONJUNCTIVA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA DISEASE; CORNEA EPITHELIUM; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IMPRESSION CYTOLOGY; LIMBAL STEM CELL DEFICIENCY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; BIOSYNTHESIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CORNEA LIMBUS; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STEM CELL;

ADULT; AGED; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CORNEAL DISEASES; EPITHELIUM, CORNEAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; KERATIN-13; LIMBUS CORNEAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STEM CELLS;

EID: 84856338455     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-7049     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Tsubota K, Satake Y, Ohyama M. Surgical reconstruction of the ocular surface in advanced ocular cicatricial pemphigoid and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;122:38-52.
2. Schwab IR, Reyes M, Isseroff RR. Successful transplantation of bioengineered tissue replacements in patients with ocular surface disease. Cornea. 2000;19:421-426.
3. Nishida K, Yamato M, Hayashida Y, et al. Corneal reconstruction with tissue-engineered cell sheets composed of autologous oral mucosal epithelium. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1187-1196.
4. Moll R, Franke WW, Schiller DL, Geiger B, Krepler R. The catalog of human cytokeratins: patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tumors and cultured cells. Cell. 1982;31:11-24.
5. Cooper D, Schermer A, Sun TT. Classification of human epithelia and their neoplasms using monoclonal antibodies to keratins: strategies, applications, and limitations. Lab Invest. 1985;52:243-256.
6. Cooper D, Sun TT. Monoclonal antibody analysis of bovine epithelial keratins. Specific pairs as defined by coexpression. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:4646-4654.
7. Schermer A, Galvin S, Sun TT. Differentiation-related expression of a major 64K corneal keratin in vivo and in culture suggests limbal location of corneal epithelial stem cells. J Cell Biol. 1986;103:49-62.
8. Kasper M, Moll R, Stosiek P, Karsten U. Patterns of cytokeratin and vimentin expression in the human eye. Histochemistry. 1988;89: 369-377.
9. Chaloin-Dufau C, Sun TT, Dhouailly D. Appearance of the keratin pair K3/K12 during embryonic and adult corneal epithelial differentiation in the chick and in the rabbit. Cell Differ Dev. 1990;32: 97-108.
10. Espana EM, Di Pascuale MA, He H, et al. Characterization of corneal pannus removed from patients with total limbal stem cell deficiency. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2961-2966.
11. Elder MJ, Hiscott P, Dart JKG. Intermediate filament expression by normal and diseased human corneal epithelium. Hum Pathol. 1997;28:1348-1354.
12. Kawasaki S, Tanioka H, Yamasaki K, Yokoi N, Komuro A, Kinoshita S. Clusters of corneal epithelial cells reside ectopically in human conjunctival epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47: 1359-1367.
13. Wei ZG, Wu RL, Lavker RM, Sun TT. In vitro growth and differentiation of rabbit bulbar, fornix, and palpebral conjunctival epithelia. Implications on conjunctival epithelial transdifferentiation and stem cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:1814-1828.
14. Barbaro V, Ferrari S, Fasolo A, et al. Evaluation of ocular surface disorders: a new diagnostic tool based on impression cytology and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94: 926-932.
15. Krenzer KL, Freddo TF. Cytokeratin expression in normal human bulbar conjunctiva obtained by impression cytology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:142-152.
16. Ang LPK, Tan DTH, Beuerman RW, Lavker RM. Development of a conjunctival epithelial equivalent with improved proliferative properties using a multistep serum-free culture system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1789-1795.
17. Jirsova K, Dudakova L, Kalasova S, Vesela V, Merjava S. The OV-TL 12/30 clone of anti-cytokeratin 7 antibody as a new marker of corneal conjunctivalization in patients with limbal stem cell deficiency. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:5892-5898.
18. Chen JJ, Tseng SC. Abnormal corneal epithelial wound healing in partial-thickness removal of limbal epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:2219-2233.
19. Puangsricharern V, Tseng SCG. Cytologic evidence of corneal diseases with limbal stem cell deficiency. Ophthalmology. 1995; 102:1476-1485.
20. Nelson JD, Wright JC. Conjunctival goblet cell densities in ocular surface disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102:1049-1051.
21. Rivas L, Oroza MA, Perez-Esteban A, Murube-del-Castillo J. Morphological changes in ocular surface in dry eyes and other disorders by impression cytology. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1992; 230:329-334.
22. Kinoshita S, Kiorpes TC, Friend J, Thoft RA. Goblet cell density in ocular surface disease. A better indicator than tear mucin. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101:1284-1287.
23. Ohji M, Ohmi G, Kiritoshi A, Kinoshita S. Goblet cell density in thermal and chemical injuries. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:1686-1688.
24. Majo F, Barrandon Y, Othenin-Girard P, Toublanc M, Hoang-Xuan T. Corneal epithelial diseases related to limbal stem cell deficiency [in French]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2006;29:1060-1069.
25. Sacchetti M, Lambiase A, Cortes M, et al. Clinical and cytological findings in limbal stem cell deficiency. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243:870-876.
26. Ramirez-Miranda A, Nakatsu MN, Zarei-Ghanavati S, Nguyen CV, Deng SX. Keratin 13 is a more specific marker of conjunctival epithelium than keratin 19. Mol Vis. 2011;17:1652-1661.
27. Yoshida S, Shimmura S, Kawakita T, et al. Cytokeratin 15 can be used to identify the limbal phenotype in normal and diseased ocular surfaces. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:4780-4786.
28. Kim H-S, Song XJ, de Paiva CS, Chen Z, Pflugfelder SC, Li D-Q. Phenotypic characterization of human corneal epithelial cells expanded ex vivo from limbal explant and single cell cultures. Exp Eye Res. 2004;79:41-49.
29. Ryder MI, Weinreb RN. Cytokeratin patterns in corneal, limbal, and conjunctival epithelium. An immunofluorescence study with PKK-1, 812, 860, and 462 anticytokeratin antibodies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:2230-2234.
30. Madhira SL, Vemuganti G, Bhaduri A, Gaddipati S, Sangwan VS, Ghanekar Y. Culture and characterization of oral mucosal epithelial cells on human amniotic membrane for ocular surface reconstruction. Mol Vis. 2008;14:189-196.
31. Collin C, Ouhayoun J-P. Grund C, Franke WW. Suprabasal marker proteins distinguishing keratinizing squamous epithelia: cytokeratin 2 polypeptides of oral masticatory epithelium and epidermis are different. Differentiation. 1992;51:137-148.