The OV-TL 12/30 clone of anti-cytokeratin 7 antibody as a new marker of corneal conjunctivalization in patients with limbal stem cell deficiency

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 5892-5898

  Jirsova, Katerina ^a,b   Dudakova, Lubica ^a   Kalasova, Sarka ^a   Vesela, Viera ^a   Merjava, Stanislava ^a  

^a Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOKERATIN 19; CYTOKERATIN 7 ANTIBODY; CYTOKERATIN ANTIBODY; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ANTIBODY; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; CYTOKERATIN 7;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONJUNCTIVA EPITHELIUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA CONJUNCTIVALIZATION; CORNEA DISEASE; CORNEA EPITHELIUM; CORNEA LIMBUS; GOBLET CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IMPRESSION CYTOLOGY; LIMBAL STEM CELL DEFICIENCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; WESTERN BLOTTING; ADULT STEM CELL; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; CADAVER; CONJUNCTIVA; GENETICS; IMMUNOLOGY; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY;

ADULT; ADULT STEM CELLS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANTIBODIES; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CADAVER; CONJUNCTIVA; CORNEAL DISEASES; EPITHELIUM, CORNEAL; HUMANS; KERATIN-19; KERATIN-7; LIMBUS CORNEAE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 80053310961     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6748     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Sack RA, Nunes I, Beaton A, Morris C. Host-defense mechanism of the ocular surfaces. Biosci Rep. 2001;21:463-480.
2. Thoft RA, Friend J, Kenyon KR. Ocular surface response to trauma. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1979;19:111-131.
3. Chang CY, Green CR, McGhee CN, Sherwin T. Acute wound healing in the human central corneal epithelium appears to be independent of limbal stem cell influence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:5279-5286.
4. Dua HS, Miri A, Alomar T, Yeung AM, Said DG. The role of limbal stem cells in corneal epithelial maintenance: testing the dogma. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:856-863.
5. Thoft RA, Friend J. The X, Y, Z hypothesis of corneal epithelial maintenance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983;24:1442-1443.
6. Foster CS, Sainz De La Maza M. Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid review. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;4:435-439.
7. Puangsricharern V, Tseng SC. Cytologic evidence of corneal diseases with limbal stem cell deficiency. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1476-1485.
8. Solomon A, Espana EM, Tseng SC. Amniotic membrane transplantation for reconstruction of the conjunctival fornices. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:93-100.
9. Sridhar MS, Vemuganti GK, Bansal AK, Rao GN. Impression cytology-proven corneal stem cell deficiency in patients after surgeries involving the limbus. Cornea. 2001;20:145-148.
10. Shortt AJ, Secker GA, Notara MD, et al. Transplantation of ex vivo cultured limbal epithelial stem cells: a review of techniques and clinical results. Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52:483-502.
11. Tseng SH, Yen JS, Chien HL. Lens epithelium in senile cataract. J Formos Med Assoc. 1994;93:93-98.
12. Maskin SL, Heitman KF, Lawton AW, Yee RW. Diagnostic impression cytology for external eye disease. Cornea. 1989;8:270-273.
13. Shapiro MS, Friend J, Thoft RA. Corneal re-epithelialization from the conjunctiva. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;21:135-142.
14. Egbert PR, Lauber S, Maurice DM. A simple conjunctival biopsy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1977;84:798-801.
15. Donisi PM, Rama P, Fasolo A, Ponzin D. Analysis of limbal stem cell deficiency by corneal impression cytology. Cornea. 2003;22:533-538.
16. Elder MJ, Hiscott P, Dart JK. Intermediate filament expression by normal and diseased human corneal epithelium. Hum Pathol. 1997;28:1348-1354.
17. Jirsova K, Neuwirth A, Kalasova S, Vesela V, Merjava S. Mesothelial proteins are expressed in the human cornea. Exp Eye Res.
18. Pitz S, Moll R. Intermediate-filament expression in ocular tissue. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2002;21:241-262.
19. Kasper M, Moll R, Stosiek P, Karsten U. Patterns of cytokeratin and vimentin expression in the human eye. Histochemistry. 1988;89: 369-377.
20. Kivela T, Uusitalo M. Structure, development and function of cytoskeletal elements in non-neuronal cells of the human eye. Prog Retin Eye Res. 1998;17:385-428.
21. Chen WY, Mui MM, Kao WW, Liu CY, Tseng SC. Conjunctival epithelial cells do not transdifferentiate in organotypic cultures: expression of K12 keratin is restricted to corneal epithelium. Curr Eye Res. 1994;13:765-778.
22. Moll R, Franke WW, Schiller DL, Geiger B, Krepler R. The catalog of human cytokeratins: patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tumors and cultured cells. Cell. 1982;31:11-24.
23. Lauweryns B, van den Oord JJ, De Vos R, Missotten L. A new epithelial cell type in the human cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:1983-1990.
24. Chen Z, de Paiva CS, Luo L, Kretzer FL, Pflugfelder SC, Li DQ. Characterization of putative stem cell phenotype in human limbal epithelia. Stem Cells. 2004;22:355-366.
25. Yoshida S, Shimmura S, Kawakita T, et al. Cytokeratin 15 can be used to identify the limbal phenotype in normal and diseased ocular surfaces. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:4780-4786.
26. Leube RE, Bosch FX, Romano V, Zimbelmann R, Hofler H, Franke WW. Cytokeratin expression in simple epithelia. III. Detection of mRNAs encoding human cytokeratins nos. 8 and 18 in normal and tumor cells by hybridization with cDNA sequences in vitro and in situ. Differentiation. 1986;33:69-85.
27. Moll R, Divo M, Langbein L. The human keratins: biology and pathology. Histochem Cell Biol. 2008;129:705-733.
28. Ramaekers F, Huysmans A, Schaart G, Moesker O, Vooijs P. Tissue distribution of keratin 7 as monitored by a monoclonal antibody. Exp Cell Res. 1987;170:235-249.
29. Krenzer KL, Freddo TF. Cytokeratin expression in normal human bulbar conjunctiva obtained by impression cytology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:142-152.
30. Moroi SE, Gokhale PA, Schteingart MT, et al. Clinicopathologic correlation and genetic analysis in a case of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:461-470.
31. Merjava S, Neuwirth A, Mandys V, Jirsova K. Cytokeratins 8 and 18 in adult human corneal endothelium. Exp Eye Res. 2009;89:426-431.
32. Gill GW, Frost JK, Miller KA. A new formula for a half-oxidized hematoxylin solution that neither overstains nor requires differentiation. Acta Cytol. 1974;18:300-311.
33. Martinez AJ, Mills MB, Jaceldo KB, et al. Standardization of conjunctival impression cytology. Cornea. 1995;14:515-522.
34. Tseng SC. Staging of conjunctival squamous metaplasia by impression cytology. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:728-733.
35. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680-685.
36. Kasper M, Stosiek P, Lane B. Cytokeratin and vimentin heterogeneity in human cornea. Acta Histochem. 1992;93:371-381.
37. Di Iorio E, Barbaro V, Ruzza A, Ponzin D, Pellegrini G, De Luca M. Isoforms of DeltaNp63 and the migration of ocular limbal cells in human corneal regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102: 9523-9528.
38. Mygind H, Nielsen B, Moe D, Clausen H, Dabelsteen E, Clausen PP. Antikeratin antibodies in routine diagnostic pathology: a comparison of 10 different commercial antikeratins. Apmis. 1988;96: 1009-1022.
39. van Niekerk CC, Jap PHK, Thomas CMG, et al. Marker profile of mesothelial cells versus ovarian carcinoma cells. Int J Cancer. 1989;43:1065-1071.
40. Ramaekers F, van Niekerk C, Poels L, et al. Use of monoclonal antibodies to keratin 7 in the differential diagnosis of adenocarcinomas. Am J Pathol. 1990;136:641-655.