Risk analysis in research environment

Journal of Risk Research

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 187-208

  Groso, Amela ^a   Ouedraogo, Aristide ^a   Meyer, Thierry ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

occupational safety; research environment; risk analysis

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ENVIRONMENT; ALL-HAZARDS; ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES; CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES; CRITICAL AREA; DETECTABILITY; DEVELOPMENT STAGES; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; NONLINEAR FUNCTIONS; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; PRIORITIZATION; RESEARCH ENVIRONMENT; RESEARCH PROGRAMS; RISK ANALYSIS METHODS; RISK INDICES; SEMI-QUANTITATIVE;

ACCIDENTS; HAZARDS; OCCUPATIONAL RISKS; RESEARCH; RISK ANALYSIS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84856278899     PISSN: 13669877     EISSN: 14664461     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2011.634513     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ahmadi, A., and P. Soderholm. 2008. Assessment of operational consequences of aircraft failures: Using event tree analysis. In 2008 IEEE Aerospace conference, vols. 1-9, 3824-37. Big Sky, MT: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
2. Ben-Daya, M., and A. Raouf. 1993. A revised failure mode and effects analysis model. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 13: 43-7.
3. Bluvband, Z., Grabov, P., and Nakar, O. 2004. Expanded FMEA (EFMEA). Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium Proceedings. Los Angeles, CA. 31-6.
4. Bowles, J.B. 2003. An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Proceedings, Tampa, FL. 380-6.
5. Bowles, J.B., and C.E. Pelaez. 1995. Fuzzy-logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 50, no. 2: 203-13.
6. Braband, J., and S. Griebel. 2004. Engineering a simple, yet rigorous, Risk Analysis Method, ISSC2004, Rhode Island. 149-57.
7. Byers, J.C., D.I. Gertman, S.G. Hill, H.S. Blackman, C.D. Gentillon, B.P. Hallbert, and L.N. Haney. 2000. Simplified plant analysis risk (SPAR) human reliability analysis (HRA) methodology: Comparisons with other HRA methods. International Ergonomics Association and Human Factors & Ergonomics Society annual meeting.
8. Cagno, E., F. Caron, and M. Mancini. 2002. Risk analysis in plant commissioning: The multilevel HAZOP. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 77, no. 3: 309-23. (Pubitemid 34946916)
9. CCPS. 2008. Guidelines for hazard evaluation procedures. New York, NY: Wiley.
10. Chen, J.K., and Y.C. Lee. 2007. Risk priority evaluated by APN in failure mode and effects analysis. Quality Tools and Techniques 4, no. 4: 1-6.
11. Chin, K.S., A. Chan, and J.B. Yang. 2008. Development of a Fuzzy FMEA based product design system. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 36, no. 7-8: 633-49.
12. Ching-Liang, C., W. Chiu-Chi, and L. Yeong-Hoang. 1999. Failure mode and effects analysis using Fuzzy method and Grey theory. Kybernetes 28: 1072-80.
13. Cocchiara, M., V. Bartolozzi, A. Picciotto, and M. Galluzzo. 2001. Integration of interlock system analysis with automated HAZOP analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 74, no. 1: 99-105. (Pubitemid 32842228)
14. D'Urso, G., D. Stancheris, N. Valsecchi, G. Maccarini, and A. Bugini. 2005. A new FMEA approach based on availability and costs. In Advanced manufacturing systems and technology, ed. E. Kuljanic. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
15. Ekaette, E., R.C. Lee, D.L. Cooke, S. Iftody, and P. Craighead. 2007. Probabilistic fault tree analysis of a radiation treatment system. Risk Analysis 27, no. 6: 1395-410. (Pubitemid 350264534)
16. Ericson, C.A. 1999. Fault tree analysis-a history. A history from the Proceeding of the 17th International System Safety Conference. 9.
17. Ericson, C.A. 2005. Hazard analysis techniques for system safety. Fredericksburg, VA: Wiley.
18. Ferrieres, V., J.N. Bertho, and D. Plusquellec. 1998. A convenient synthesis of alkyl D-glycofuranosiduronic acids and alkyl D-glycofuranosides from unprotected carbohydrates. Carbohydrate Research 311, no. 1-2: 25-35. (Pubitemid 28461909)
19. Fine, W.T. 1971. Mathematical evaluation for controlling hazards. Journal of Safety Research 3, no. 4: 157-66.
20. Forsbom, U., L. Escher, and J. Dey. 2001. Méthode SUVA d'appréciation des risques à des postes de travail et lors de processus de travail [SUVA method for risk assessment at the work place and during working process], (n 66099.f).
21. Foster, B.L. 2002. Principles of laboratory safety management in academia. 224th ACS National Meeting.
22. Franceschini, F., and M. Galetto. 2001. A new approach for evaluation of risk priorities of failure modes in FMEA. International Journal of production research 39, no. 13: 2991-3002. (Pubitemid 35165556)
23. Guimaraes, A.C.F., and C.M.F. Lapa. 2007. Fuzzy inference to risk assessment on nuclear engineering systems. Applied Soft Computing 7, no. 1: 17-28. (Pubitemid 44739425)
24. Hashemi-Tilehnoee, M., A. Pazirandeh, and S. Tashakor. 2010. HAZOP-study on heavy water research reactor primary cooling system. Annals of Nuclear Energy 37: 428-33.
25. Hauptmanns, U., M. Marx, and T. Knetsch. 2005. GAP - a fault-tree based methodology for analyzing occupational hazards. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 18, no. 2: 107-13, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.02.002. (Pubitemid 40466031)
26. Hill, J.R.H. 2007. The emergence of laboratory safety. Journal of Chemical Health and Safety 14, no. 3: 14-9.
27. Inoue, K., and A. Koizumi. 2004. Application of human reliability analysis to nursing errors in hospitals. Risk Analysis 24, no. 6: 1459-73. (Pubitemid 40076070)
28. Jiahao, Z., A. Min, and N.J. Smith. 2007. Application of a fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment. International Journal of Project Management 25, no. 6: 589-600. (Pubitemid 47079918)
29. Jung, W., J. Park, J. Kim, and J. Ha. 2007. Analysis of an operators' performance time and its application to a human reliability analysis in nuclear power plants. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 54, no. 5: 1801-11. (Pubitemid 47599158)
30. Khan, F.I., and S.A. Abbasi. 1998. Techniques and methodologies for risk analysis in chemical process industries. Process Safety Progress 11, no. 4: 261-77. (Pubitemid 28279116)
31. Kim, I.S. 2001. Human reliability analysis in the man-machine interface design review. Annals of Nuclear Energy 28, no. 11: 1069-81. (Pubitemid 32408839)
32. Kinney, G.F., and A.D. Wiruth. 1976. Practical risk analysis for safety management. China Lake, CA: Naval Weapons Center.
33. Labovsky, J., Z. Svandova, J. Markos, and L. Jelemensky. 2008. HAZOP study of a fixed bed reactor for MTBE synthesis using a dynamic approach. Chemical Papers 62, no. 1: 51-7.
34. Langerman, N. 2008. Management of change for laboratories and pilots plants. Organic Process Research & Development 12, no. 6: 1305-6.
35. Marcellis-Warin N.d. I. Peignier, and B. Sinclair-Desgagné, 2002. Analyse économique du Risk Management Program (section 112™ du Clean Air Actý), Québec.
36. Markowski, A.S., and S.M. Mannan. 2008. Fuzzy risk matrix. Journal of Hazardous Materials 159, no. 1: 152-7.
37. McCoy, S.A., D.F. Zhou, and P.W.H. Chung. 2006. State-based modelling in hazard identification. Applied Intelligence 24, no. 3: 263-79.
38. Mushtaq, F., and P.W.H. Chung. 2000. A systematic HAZOP procedure for batch processes, and its application to pipeless plants. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 13, no. 1: 41-8. (Pubitemid 30519267)
39. Ouédraogo, A., A. Groso, and T. Meyer. 2011. Risk analysis in research environment - Part II: Weighting lab criticity index using the analytic hierarchy process. Safety Science, doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2010.12.011.
40. Price, C.J., and N.S. Taylor. 2002. Automated multiple failure FMEA. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 76, no. 1: 1-10. (Pubitemid 34405761)
41. Reer, B. 2008. Review of advances in human reliability analysis of errors of commission, Part 1: EOC identification. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 93, no. 8: 1091-104. (Pubitemid 351418140)
42. Reniers, G.L.L., W. Dullaert, B.J.M. Ale, and K. Soudan. 2005. Developing an external domino accident prevention framework: Hazwim. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 18, no. 3: 127-38. (Pubitemid 40950440)
43. Ruiz, D., C. Benqlilou, J.M. Nougues, L. Puigjaner, and C. Ruiz. 2002. Proposal to speed up the implementation of an abnormal situation management in the chemical process industry. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 41. no. 4: 817-24. doi: 10.1021/ie001042z. (Pubitemid 34165744)
44. Saaty, R.W. 1987. The analytic hierarchy process - what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling 9, no. 3-5: 161-76.
45. Scipioni, A., G. Saccarola, A. Centazzo, and F. Arena. 2002. FMEA methodology design, implementation and integration with HACCP system in a food company. Food Control 13, no. 8: 495-501. (Pubitemid 35252335)
46. Seyed-Hosseini, S.M., N. Safaei, and M.J. Asgharpour. 2006. Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 91, no. 8: 872-81.
47. Strater, O. 2004. Human reliability analysis: Data issues and errors of commission. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 83, no. 2: 127-7.
48. Su, C.T., and C.J. Chou. 2008. A systematic methodology for the creation of Six Sigma projects: A case study of semiconductor foundry. Expert Systems with Applications 34, no. 4: 2693-703.
49. Swann, C.D., and M.L. Preston. 1995. Twenty-five years of HAZOPs. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 8, no. 6: 349-53.
50. Thivel, P.X., Y. Bultel, and F. Delpech. 2008. Risk analysis of a biomass combustion process using MOSAR and FMEA methods. Journal of Hazardous Materials 151, no. 1: 221-31.
51. Warner, F. 1975. Flixborough disaster. Chemical Engineering Progress 71, no. 9: 77-84.
52. Zadeh, L.A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8: 338-53.
53. Zhao, C., M. Bhushan, and V. Venkatasubramanian. 2005. Phasuite: An automated HAZOP analysis tool for chemical processes. Part I: Knowledge engineering framework. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 83, no. B6: 509-32.