Risk analysis in research environment - Part II: Weighting Lab Criticity Index using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Safety Science

Volumn 49, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 785-793

  Ouédraogo, Aristide ^a   Groso, Amela ^a   Meyer, Thierry ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Analytic Hierarchy Process; Criticity index; Multicriteria decision making; Risk analysis; Risk assessment; Risk priority number

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS RESULTS; CRITICITY INDEX; DETECTABILITY; LABORATORY ASSESSMENT; MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING; PRELIMINARY RISK ASSESSMENT; RESEARCH ENVIRONMENT; RISK PRIORITY NUMBER; SURJECTIVE;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION MAKING; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; LABORATORIES; OCCUPATIONAL RISKS; RATING; RESEARCH; RISK ANALYSIS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; ARTICLE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; LAB CRITICITY INDEX; LABORATORY ASSESSMENT AND RISK ANALYSIS; LASER; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METHODOLOGY; MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING; OCCUPATIONAL HAZARD; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISK PRIORITY NUMBER;

EID: 79955643488     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.12.011     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ben-Daya M., Raouf A. A revised failure mode and effects analysis model. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 1993, 13:43-47.
2. Bodin L., Gass S.I. On teaching the analytic hierarchy process. Computers & Operations Research 2003, 30:1487-1497.
3. Bowles, J.B., 2003. An Assessment of RPN Prioritization in a Failure Modes Effects and Criticality Analysis. Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, pp. 380-386.
4. Braband J. Improving the risk priority number concept. Journal of safety 2003, 21:23.
5. Braband, J., 2006. Risk assessment: as simple as possible (and no simple). In: CNF, I. (Ed.), System Safety, 2006. The 1st Institution of Engineering and Technology International Conference, pp. 285-299.
6. Brody B., Létourneau Y., Poirier A. An indirect cost theory of work accident prevention. Journal of Occupational Accidents 1990, 13:255-270.
7. Brody B., Létourneau Y., Poirier A. Le coût des accidents de travail: etat de connaissance 1990, 45:94-116.
8. EN-60825-1, 2007. Safety of laser products, In: Commission, I.E. (Ed.).
9. Ho W., Dey P.K. Multicriteria decision-making techniques in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management 2006, 20:319-337.
10. Ouédraogo A., Grõso A., Meyer T. Risk analysis in research environment. Part I, modeling lab criticity index using improved risk priority number. Journal of Safety Science 2011, 49:778-784.
11. Saaty R.W. The analytic hierarchy process - what it is done and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling 1987, 9:161-176.
12. Saaty T.L. How to make a decision - the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 1990, 24:19-43.
13. Saaty T.L., Ozdemir M.S. Why the magic number seven plus or minus two. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2003, 38:233-244.
14. Steuer R.E., Na P. Multiple criteria decision making combined with finance. A categorized bibliographic study. European Journal of Operational Research 2003, 150:496-515.
15. Vaidya O.S., Kumar S. Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research 2006, 169:1-29.
16. Veltri A. An accident cost impact model: the direct cost component. Journal of Safety Research 1990, 21:67-73.
17. Zimmermann H.J. An application-oriented view of modeling uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research 2000, 122:190-198.