Developing an external domino accident prevention framework: Hazwim

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 127-138

  Reniers, G L L ^a   Dullaert, W ^a   Ale, B J M ^b   Soudan, K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; OPTIMIZATION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

DOMINO ACCIDENTS; OFF-SITE MAJOR ACCIDENTS; RISK ANALYSIS; TOP TIER COMPANIES;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION;

SAFETY;

EID: 21944451719     PISSN: 09504230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. H. Baksteen Instrument domino effecten Bilthoven 2003 RIVM The Netherlands
2. G. Balloco, A. Carpignano, G. Di Figlia, J.-P. Nordvik, and L. Rizzuti Development of new tools for the consequence assessment of major accidents 2000 Joint Research Centre of the European Communities Ispra
3. Center for Chemical Process Safety Guidelines for hazard evaluation procedures 2nd ed. 1992 American Institute of Chemical Engineers New York
4. Council Directive 96/82/EC on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances (1997). Official Journal No. L 010 of 14 January 1997.
5. Delvosalle, Ch. (1996). Domino effects phenomena: Definition, overview and classification. In Administration of labour safety, Proceedings of the European seminar on domino effects, Leuven (p. 5). Brussels: Ministry of Employment and Labour.
6. Delvosalle, Ch., Fievez, C., & Brohez, S. (2002). A methodology and a software (DominoXL) for studying domino effects. Presentation at the Chisa 2002, 15th international congress of chemical and process engineering, Praha.
7. Department of Defence (2000). Standard practice for system safety. MIL-STD-882D. Ohio: HQ Air Force Materiel Command.
8. DNV (2005). Software for the assessment of flammable, explosive and toxic impacts (SAFETI). Available online: http://www.dnv.com/consulting/ safetyhealthenvironment/software/safeti.asp
9. W.W. Doerr What-if analysis H.R. Greenberg J.J. Cramer Risk assessment and risk management for the chemical process industry 1991 Wiley New York
10. W.F. Early, and R.M. Sherrod Hazard and operability studies H.R. Greenberg J.J. Cramer Risk assessment and risk management for the chemical process industry 1991 Wiley New York
11. C. Fievez Effets domino dans l'industrie chimique: recherche d'une méthodologie de prevention sur base d'une analyse accidentologique 1996 Faculté Polytechnique de Mons Mons
12. W.T. Fine, and W.D. Kinney Mathematical evaluation for controlling hazards Journal of Safety Research 3 4 1971 157 166
13. Ford, K. A., & Brown, W. H. (1990). Innovative applications of the Hazop Technique. Presentation at the AIChE Spring National Meeting, Orlando.
14. H.R. Greenberg, and J.J. Cramer Risk assessment and risk management for the chemical process industry 1991 Wiley New York
15. J. Hovden Models of organizations versus safety management approaches: a discussion based on studies of the 'internal control of SHE' reform in Norway A. Hale M. Baram Safety management The challenge of change 1998 Pergamon Oxford
16. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi Models for domino effect analysis in chemical process industries Process Safety Progress 17 2 1998 107 123
17. F.L. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi DOMIFFECT (DOMIno eFFECT): a new software for domino effect analysis in chemical process industries Environment Modelling and Software 13 1998 163 177
18. T.A. Kletz Hazop and Hazan 1999 Editions Technip Paris
19. J. Malchaire General strategy of risk management SOBANE Method for the participatory screening of the risks Déparis 2003 Université Catholique de Louvain Brussels
20. M.L. Preston, and C.D. Swann Twenty-five years of Hazops Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 8 6 1995 349 353
21. G. Reniers, W. Dullaert, K. Soudan, and B. Ale The use of current risk analysis tools evaluated towards preventing external domino accidents Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process 2005
22. G. Spadoni, S. Contini, and G. Ugoccioni The new version of ARIPAR and the benefits given in assessing and managing major risks in industrialized areas Process Safety and Environmental Protection 81 1 2003 19 30
23. Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand (1999). Risk Management, Australian/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS4360.
24. Uth, H. J., & Richter, B. (1999). DISMA. Presentation at the seminar on software tools relevant to the Seveso II Directive, Turku, Finland.