Changes in gait parameters in total hip arthroplasty patients before and after surgery

Medical Science Monitor

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2008, Pages

  Cichy, Benedykt ^a   Wilk, Magdalena ^b,c   Śliwiński, Zbigniew ^c  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Poland)

^b JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^c JAN KOCHANOWSKI UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Asymmetry of gait; Endoprosthesis; Osteoarthritis; Pedobarography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOOT; GAIT; GAIT DISORDER; GROUND REACTION FORCE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANGE OF MOTION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; GAIT; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REHABILITATION;

EID: 41449100459     PISSN: 12341010     EISSN: 16433750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Persson T: A marker-free method for tracking human lower limb segments based on model matching. Intern J Biomed Comp, 1996; 41(2): 87-97
2. Trew M, Everett T: Human movement: an introductory text. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997; 155-65
3. McGibbon CA: Toward a better understanding of gait changes with age and disablement: neuromuscular adaptation. Exer Sport Sci Rev, 2003; 31(2): 102-8
4. Murray MP: Gait as a total pattern of movement. Amer J Phys Med, 1967; 46(1): 290-333
5. Smidt GL, Arora JS, Johnston RC: Accelerographic analysis of several types of walking. Amer J Phys Med, 1971; 50(6): 285-300
6. Mills PM, Barrett RS: Swing phase mechanics of healthy young and elderly men. Human Movet Sci, 2001; 20(4-5): 427-46
7. Hesse S, Sonntag D, Bardeleben A et al: [The gait of patients with full weight-bearing capacity after hip prosthesis implantation on the tread-mill with partial body weight support during assisted walking and without crutches] Zeitschrift Orthop Grenz, 1999; 137(3): 265-72
8. Sonntag D, Uhlenbrock D, Bardeleben A et al: Gait with and without forearm crutches in patients with total hip arthroplasty. Intern J Rehab Res, 2000; 23(3): 233-43
9. Keuttner KE, Goldberg VM (eds). Osteoarthritic disorders. Rosemont, California, USA: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, 1995
10. Hoaglund FT, Steinbach LS: Primary osteoarthritis of the hip: etiology and epidemiology. J Amer Acad Orthop Surg, 2001; 9(5): 320-27
11. Hartofilakidis G, Karachalios T: Idiopathic osteoarthritis of the hip: incidence classification and natural history of 272 cases. Orthopedics, 2003; 26(2): 161-66
12. Boardman DL, Dorey F, Thomas BJ, Lieberman JR: The accuracy of assessing total hip arthroplasty outcomes: a prospective correlation study of walking ability and 2 validated measurement devices. J Arthropl, 2000; 15(2): 200-4
13. Zimmerman S, Hawkes WG, Hudson JI et al: Outcomes of surgical management of total hip replacement in patients aged 65 years and older: cemented versus cementless femoral components and lateral or anterolateral versus posterior anatomical approach. J Orthop Res, 2002; 20(2): 182-91
14. Lin JH, Chou YL, Ju MS, Sung YT: [Application and evaluation of the VICON system in gait analysis]. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi, 1990; 6(1): 6-11
15. Perron M, Malouin F, Moffet H, McFadyen BJ: Three-dimensional gait analysis in women with a total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon), 2000; 15(7): 504-15
16. Robinson JL, Smidt GL: Quantitative gait evaluation in the clinic. Phys Ther 1981; 61(3): 351-53
17. Aminian K, Rezakhanlou K, De Andres E et al: Temporal feature estimation during walking using miniature accelerometers: an analysis of gait improvement after hip arthroplasty. Med Biol Eng Comp, 1999; 37(6): 686-91
18. Tsvetkova T, Lebedev V, Makarov Y, Kazimirsky V: Early diagnosis of coxarthrosis (in-shoe plantar pressure measurements). Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon), 1997; 12(3): 18-20
19. Barnett S, Cunningham JL, West S: A comparison of vertical force and temporal parameters produced by an in-shoe pressure measuring system and a force platform. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon), 2001; 16(4): 353-57
20. Barnett S, Cunningham JL, West S: A comparison of vertical force and temporal parameters produced by an in-shoe pressure measuring system and a force platform. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon), 2000; 15(10): 781-85
21. Burgess S, Jordan C, Bartlett R: The influence of a small insert in the footbed of a shoe upon plantar pressure distribution. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon), 1997; 12(3): 5-6
22. Ellegast R, Kupfer J, Reinert D: Load weight determination during dynamic working procedures using the pedar foot pressure distribution measuring system. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon), 1997; 12(3): 10-11
23. Kernozek TW, LaMott EE, Dancisak MJ: Reliability of an in-shoe pressure measurement system during treadmill walking. Foot Ankle Intern, 1996; 17(4): 204-9
24. Hughes J: Reliability of pressure measurements: the EMED F system. Clin Biomech, 1991; 6: 14-18
25. Quaney B, Meyer K, Cornwall MW, McPoil TG: A comparison of the dynamic pedobarograph and EMED systems for measuring dynamic foot pressures. Foot Ankle Intern, 1995; 16(9): 562-66
26. EMED SF-4 User Manual. Munich: Novel Press, 1994
27. Kemoun G, Defebvre L: [Gait disorders in Parkinson disease: clinical description, analysis of posture, initiation of stabilized gait]. Presse Medicale, 2001; 30(9): 452-59
28. Verghese J, Lipton RB, Hall CB et al: Abnormality of gait as a predictor of non-Alzheimer's dementia. NEJM, 2002; 347(22): 1761-68
29. Vela SA, Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Anaim AA: The effect of increased weight on peak pressures: implications for obesity and diabetic foot pathology. J Foot Ankle Surg, 1998; 37(5): 416-20; discussion 448-49
30. Peters EJ, Urukalo A, Fleischli JG, Lavery LA: Reproducibility of gait analysis variables: one-step versus three-step method of data acquisition. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2002; 41(4): 206-12
31. McPoil TG, Cornwall MW, Dupuis L, Cornwell M: Variability of plantar pressure data: a comparison of the two-step and midgait methods. J Amer Podiatr Med Assoc, 1999; 89(10): 495-501
32. Cornwall M, McPoil T: The effect of foot orthotics on the initiation of plantar surface loading. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon), 1997; 12(3): 4-8
33. Orlin M, Stetson K, Skowronski J, Pierrynowski M: Foot pressure distribution: methodology and clinical application for children with ankle rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon), 1997; 12(3): 17-19
34. Wilk M, Fra?czuk B: [Evaluating changes in the range of movement in the hip joint in patients with degenerative changes, before and after total hip replacement.] Ortop Traumatol Rehab, 2004; 6(3): 342-49
35. Wilk M, Fra?czuk B: [Analysis of changes in the strength of muscles acting on the hip joint in patients recovering from hip arthroplasty.] Fizjoter Pol, 2003; 3(4): 309-15
36. Hughes J: The clinical use of pedobarography. Acta Orthop Belg, 1993; 59(1): 10-16
37. Bryant A, Singer K, Tinley P: Comparison of the reliability of plantar pressure measurements using the two-step and midgait methods of data collection. Foot Ankle Intern, 1999; 20(10): 646-50
38. Becker HP, Rosenbaum D, Kriese T et al: Gait asymmetry following successful surgical treatment of ankle fractures in young adults. Clin Orthop Rel Res, 1995; 311: 262-69
39. Shkuratova N, Morris ME, Huxham F: Effects of age on balance control during walking. Arch Phys Med Rehab, 2004; 85(4): 582-88
40. Bland M: An introduction to medical statistics. New York, Oxford University Press, 1995
41. Wall JC, Ashburn A, Klenerman L: Gait analysis in the assessment of functional performance before and after total hip replacement. J Biomed Eng, 1981; 3(2): 121-27
42. Yildiz C, Yanmis I, Tunay S et al: Evaluation of unilateral total hip arthroplasty by a quantitative analysis of gait. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 2002; 36(1): 58-62
43. Lafuente R, Belda JM, Sanchez-Lacuesta J et al: Quantitative assessment of gait deviation: contribution to the objective measurement of disability. Gait Posture, 2000; 11(3): 191-98
44. Willson JD, Kernozek TW: Plantar loading and cadence alterations with fatigue. Med Sci Sport Exer, 1999; 31(12): 1828-33
45. Gotze C, Sippel C, Rosenbaum D et al: Objective measures of gait following revision hip arthroplasty: first medium-term results 26 years after surgery. Zeitschr Orthop Grenz, 2003; 141(2): 201-8