A substituting meaning for the equals sign in arithmetic notating tasks

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 2-33

  Jones, Ian ^a   Pratt, Dave ^b  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arithmetic; Children's strategies; Computers; Middle grades, 5 8; Pre algebra

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856106168     PISSN: 00218251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc.43.1.0002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baroody, A. J., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1983). The effects of instruction on children's understanding of the "equals" sign. The Elementary SchoolJournal, 84, 199-212. doi:10.1086/461356
2. Behr, M., Erlwanger, S., & Nichols, E. (1976). How children view equality sentences (Report No. PMDC-TR-3). Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.
3. Cajori, F. (1928). A history of mathematical notations: Vol. I. Notations in elementary mathematics. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
4. Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in the elementary school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
5. Collis, K. F. (1975). A study of concrete and formal operations in school mathematics. Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
6. Damerow, P. (2007). The material culture of calculation. In U Gellert & E. Jablonka (Eds.), Mathematisation and demathematisation: Social, philosophical and educational ramifications (pp. 19-56). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
7. Department for Children, Schools and Families. (2007). Primary framework for literacy and mathematics: Guidance paper calculation. London, England: Author.
8. Dorfler, W. (2006). Inscriptions as objects of mathematical activities. In J. Maasz & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), New mathematics education research and practice (pp. 97-111). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
9. Evens, H., & Houssart, J. (2007). Paired interviews in mathematics education. In D. Kuchemann (Ed.), Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 27(2), 19-24. Retrieved from http://www.bsrlm.org.uk/IPs/ip27-2/index.html
10. Filloy, E., & Rojano, T. (1989). Solving equations: The transition from arithmetic to algebra. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 19-25. http://flm.educ.ualberta.ca/
11. Filloy, E., Rojano, T., & Solares, A. (2010). Problems dealing with unknown quantities and two different levels of representing unknowns. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 52-80. http://www.nctm.org/ publications/jrme.aspx
12. Hewitt, D. (2001). On learning to adopt formal algebraic notation. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, & J. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Study Conference of the International Commission on Mathematical Instruction: The future of the teaching and learning of algebra (Vol. 1, pp. 305-312). Melbourne, Australia: ICMI.
13. Jones, I. (2007). A Logo-based task for arithmetical activity. In I. Kalas (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th European Logo Conference: 40 years of influence on education. Bratislava, Slovakia: Faculty of Mathematics, Physics, and Informatics, Comenius University.
14. Jones, I. (2008). A diagrammatic view of the equals sign: Arithmetical equivalence as a means, not an end. Research in Mathematics Education, 10, 151-165. doi:10.1080/14794800802233688
15. Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12,317-326. doi: 10.1007/BF00311062
16. Kirshner, D. (2001). The structural algebra option revisited. In A. J. Bishop (Managing Ed.), R. Sutherland, T. Rojano, A. Bell, & R. Lins (Vol. Eds.), Mathematics education library: Vol. 22. Perspectives on school algebra (pp. 83-99). London, England: Kiuwer. doi:10.1007/0-306-47223-6-5
17. Knuth, E. J., Stephens, A. C, McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2006). Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36, 297-312. http://www.nctm.org/ pubIications/jrme.aspx (Pubitemid 44059560)
18. Li, X., Ding, M., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2008). Sources of differences in children's understandings of mathematical equality: Comparative analysis of teacher guides and student texts in China and the United States. Cognition and Instruction, 26,195-217. doi: 10.1080/0737000080198084
19. Linchevski, L., & Herscovics, N. (1996). Crossing the cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra: Operating on the unknown in the context of equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 39-65. doi:10.1007/BF00163752 (Pubitemid 126028258)
20. Linchevski, L., & Livneh, D. (1999). Structure sense: The relationship between algebraic and numerical contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40, 173-196. doi: 10.1023/A: 1003606308064
21. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2005). Why won't you change your mind? Knowledge of operational patterns hinders learning and performance on equations. Child Development, 76, 883-899. doi:10.1111/J.1467-8624.2005.00884.X (Pubitemid 41152624)
22. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
23. Molina, M., Castro, E., & Mason, J. (2008). Elementary school students' approaches to solving true/false number sentences. PNA, 2, 75-86.
24. Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Mathematics education library: Vol. 17. Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning cultures and computers (A. J. Bishop, Managing Ed.). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kiuwer.
25. Peirce, C. S. (1991). Peirce on signs: Writings on semiotic (J. Hoopes, Ed.). Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
26. Pirie, S. E. B., & Martin, L. (1997). The equation, the whole equation and nothing but the equation, One approach to the teaching of linear equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34, 159-181. doi:10.1023/A: 1003051829991 (Pubitemid 127129405)
27. Pratt, D. (1998). The construction of meanings in and for a stochastic domain of abstraction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Institute of Education, University of London, England.
28. Pratt, D. (2000). Making sense of the total of two dice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31,602-625. doi: 10.2307/749889
29. Qualifications and Curriculum Agency. (2001). Mental calculations: James and Tony. Coventry, England: Author. Retrieved from http://curriculum.qcda.gov. uk/key-stages-l-and-2/assessment/nc-in-action/items/mathematics/3/593.aspx
30. Renwick, E. M. (1932). Children's misconceptions concerning the symbols for mathematical equality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 173-183. doi: 10.111 l/j.2044-8279.1932.tb02743.x
31. Rittle-Johnson, B., Matthews, P. G., Taylor, R. S., & McEldoon, K. L. (2011). Assessing knowledge of mathematical equivalence: A construct-modeling approach. Journal of Educational Psychology,103, 85-104. doi:10.1037/a0021334
32. Saenz-Ludlow, A., & Walgamuth, C. (1998). Third graders' interpretations of equality and the equal symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35, 153-187. doi: 10.1023/A: 1003086304201 (Pubitemid 128024181)
33. Warren, E. (2003). Young children's understanding of equals: A longitudinal study. In Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 379-386). Honolulu, HI: IGPME.
34. Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Remarks on the foundations of mathematics (G. H. von Wright, R. Rhees, & G. E. M. Anscombe, Eds.). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell