INSCRIPTIONS AS OBJECTS OF MATHEMATICAL ACTIVITIES

New Mathematics Education Research and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 97-111

  Dörfler, Willibald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949652640     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1163/9789087903510_011     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Bakker, A. (2004). Design research in statistics education. Utrecht: CD-β Press.
2. Borwein, J.M. (2005). The experimental mathematician: The pleasure of discovery and the role of proof. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 10, 75-108.
3. Burton, L. (2004). Mathematicians as enquirers. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. Cobb, R., Yackel, E. and McClain K. (Eds.) (2000). Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical development: The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 5-43.
6. Cobb, P., Yackel, E., and Wood, T. (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 2-33.
7. Dantzig, D.v. (1999). Is s 101010 a finite number? In Moore, A.W. (Ed.). Infinity. Aldershot: Dartmouth. Diagrammatic Reasoning Bibliography. http://www.hcrc.ed.ac.uk/gal/Diagrams/biblio/html
8. Dörfler, W. (in press). Mathematical reasoning: Mental activity or practice with diagrams. Proceedings regular lectures ICME 10, Copenhagen.
9. Dörfler, W. (2005). Diagrammatic thinking: Affordances and constraints. In M. Hoffmann et al. (Eds.). Activity and sign-grounding mathematics education. New York: Springer, 57-66.
10. Dörfler, W. (2004a). Diagrams as means and objects of mathematical reasoning. In Developments in mathematics education in german-speaking countries. Selected papers from the Annual Conference on Didactics of Mathematics 2001. Hildesheim: Verlag Franzbecker, 39-49.
11. Dörfler, W. (2004b). Mathematical Reasoning and Observing Transformations of Diagrams. In: Ch. Bergsten and B. Grevholm (Eds.). Mathematics and language. Proc. MADIF 4. Linköping: SMDF, 7-19.
12. Dubinsky, E. and MacDonald, M.A. (2001). APOS: A constructivist the ory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In Holton, D. et al. (Eds.). The teaching and learning of mathematics at the university level: An ICME Study. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 273-280.
13. Duval, R. (1995). Sémiosis et pensée humaine. Bern: Peter Lang.
14. Godino, J.D. Batanero, C. and Rafall, R. (2005). An onto-semiotic analysis of combinatorial problems and the solving process by university students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 3-36.
15. Goldin, G.A. and Janvier, C. (Eds.) (1998). Representations and the psychology of mathematics education I, II. Special Issue of Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(1 and 2).
16. Gravemeijer, K., Lehrer, R., Oers, B.v. and Verschaffel, L. (Eds.) (2002). Symbolizing, modelling and tool use in mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
17. Gravemeijer, K. (1999). How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 155-177.
18. Heintz, B. (2000). Die Innenwelt der Mathematik. Zur Kultur und Praxis einer beweisenden Disziplin. Wien/New York: Springer.
19. Hoffmann, M.H.G. (2005). Signs as means for discoveries. In M.H.G. Hoffmann, J. Lenhard, and F. Seeger (Eds.). Activity and sign. grounding mathematics education. New York: Springer.
20. Hoffmann, M.H.G., Lenhard, J., and Seeger, F. (Eds.) (2005). Activity and sign. grounding mathematics education. New York: Springer.
21. Hoffmann, M.H.G. (2005). Erkenntnisentwicklung. Philosophische Abhandlungen Bd. 90. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
22. Krämer, S., and Bredekamp, H. (Eds.) (2003). Bild-Schrift-Zahl. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
23. Krämer, S. (1988). Symbolische Maschinen. Die Idee der Formalisierung in geschichtlichem Abriss. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
24. Lenné, H. (1969). Analyse der mathematikdidaktik in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Klett.
25. Mac Lane, S. (1986). Mathematics. Form and function. New York: Springer.
26. Marietti, S. (2005). A semiotic approach to mathematical evidence and generalization. In: M.H.G. Hoffmann, J. Lenhard, and F. Seeger (Eds.). Activity and sign. grounding mathematics education. New York: Springer.
27. Meira, L. (1998). Making sense of instructional devices: The emergence of transparency in mathematical activity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 121-142.
28. Nelson, Roger A. (2000). Proofs without words. More exercises in visual thinking. Washington, DC:Mathematical Association of America.
29. Nelson, Roger A. (1993). Proofs without words. More exercises in visual thinking. Washington, DC:Mathematical Association of America.
30. Nemirovski, R.C. (1994). On ways of symbolizing: The case of Laura and the velocity sign. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13, 389-422.
31. Otte, M. (Ed.) (1974). Mathematiker über die Mathematik. Berlin: Springer.
32. Peirce, Ch. S. (1976). The new elements of mathematics (NEM), vol. IV (Ed. C. Eisele), The Hague:Mouton.
33. Peirce, Ch. S. (1931-1958). Collected Papers I-VIII. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech and the sprouting of signs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37-70.
35. Roth, W.-R. (2003). Toward an anthropology of graphing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
36. Rotman, B. (2000). Mathematics as sign. writing, imagining, counting. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
37. Rotman, B (1993). Ad infinitum… the ghost in turing’s machine. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
38. Schmandt-Besserart, D. (1997). How writing came about. Austin. University of Texas Press.
39. di Sessa, A. (ed.) (2000). Meta-representational competence. Special Issue of Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(4).
40. Stjernfelt, F. (2000). Diagrams as centrepiece of a Peircean epistemology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society XXXVI (3), 357-384.
41. Wilson, W.S. (2005). Short response to Tunis’s letter to the editor on technology in college. Educational Studies in Mathematics 58(3), 415-420.
42. Winslow, C. (2004). Semiotics as an analytical tool for the didactics of mathematics. Nordisch Mathematikk Didaktikk (Nomad), 9(2), 81-100.