The relationship between corneal hysteresis and the magnitude of intraocular pressure reduction with topical prostaglandin therapy

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 96, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 254-257

  Agarwal, Daniel R ^a   Ehrlich, Joshua R ^a   Shimmyo, Mitsugu ^b   Radcliffe, Nathan M ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTAGLANDIN DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DRUG RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONOTHERAPY; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

ADMINISTRATION, TOPICAL; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTAGLANDINS F, SYNTHETIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 84856028088     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2010.196899     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:262-7.
2. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, et al. Predictors of long-term progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology 2007;114:1965-72.
3. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:714-20.
4. Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, et al. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma: The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA 1991;266:369-74.
5. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 2000;44:367-408.
6. Gunvant P, O'Leary DJ, Baskaran M, et al. Evaluation of tonometric correction factors. J Glaucoma 2005;14:337-43.
7. Toh T, Liew SHM, MacKinnon JR, et al. Central corneal thickness is highly heritable: the twin eye studies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:3718-22.
8. Schroeder B, Hager A, Kutschan A, et al. Measurement of viscoelastic corneal parameters (corneal hysteresis) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmologe 2008;105:916-20.
9. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, et al. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:868-75.
10. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:156-62.
11. Touboul D, Roberts C, Kérautret J, et al. Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:616-22.
12. Anand A, De Moraes CG, Teng CC, et al. Corneal hysteresis and visual field asymmetry in open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:6514e18.
13. Vandewalle E, Vandenbroeck S, Stalmans I, et al. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 2009;19:783-9.
14. Ehrlich JR, Haseltine S, Shimmyo M, et al. Evaluation of agreement between intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry and Goldmann correlated intraocular pressure by Reichert's ocular response analyser. Eye (Lond) 2010;24:1555-60.
15. Kotecha A, White E, Schlottmann PG, et al. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers. Ophthalmology 2010;117:730-7.
16. Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Gordon MO, et al. Central corneal thickness and measured IOP response to topical ocular hypotensive medication in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:717-22.
17. Sun L, Shen M, Wang J, et al. Recovery of corneal hysteresis after reduction of intraocular pressure in chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;147:1061e6.e2.
18. Wells AP, Garway-Heath DF, Poostchi A, et al. Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:3262-8.
19. Bochmann F, Ang G, Azuara-Blanco A. Lower corneal hysteresis in glaucoma patients with acquired pit of the optic nerve (APON). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246:735-8.
20. Ang GS, Bochmann F, Townend J, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties in primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2008;17:259-62.
21. Noecker RS, Dirks MS, Choplin NT, et al. A six-month randomized clinical trial comparing the intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of bimatoprost and latanoprost in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:55e63.
22. Sellem E, Rouland JF, Baudouin C, et al. Predictors of additional intraocular pressure reduction in patients changed to latanoprost/timolol fixed combination. BMC Ophthalmol 2010;10:10.
23. Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Ohmoto F. Effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters using the ocular response analyzer. J Refract Surg 2009;25:888-93.