Corneal hysteresis and visual field asymmetry in open angle glaucoma

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 6514-6518

  Anand, Aashish ^a   de Moraes, Carlos Gustavo V ^a,b   Teng, Christopher C ^a,b,c   Tello, Celso ^a,c   Liebmann, Jeffrey M ^a,b   Ritch, Robert ^a,c  

^a NEW YORK EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALPHA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CARBONATE DEHYDRATASE INHIBITOR; CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; PROSTAGLANDIN;

ADULT; ADVANCED GLAUCOMA INTERVENTION STUDY SCORING SYSTEM; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; CORNEAL RESISTANCE FACTOR; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERESIS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOPIA; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCORING SYSTEM; TONOMETRY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

AGED; COMPLIANCE; CORNEA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 79955979469     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5580     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Poinoosawmy D, Fontana L, Wu JX, Bunce CV, Hitchings RA. Frequency of asymmetric visual field defects in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:988-991.
2. Levene RZ. Low tension glaucoma: a critical review and new material. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980;24:621-664.
3. Cartwright MJ, Anderson DR. Correlation of asymmetric damage with asymmetric intraocular pressure in normal-tension glaucoma (low-tension glaucoma). Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:898-900.
4. Levine RA, Demirel S, Fan J, et al. Asymmetries and visual field summaries as predictors of glaucoma in the ocular hypertension treatment study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:3896-3903.
5. Greenfield DS, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, Krupin T, Low-Pressure Glaucoma Study Group. Visual field and intraocular pressure asymmetry in the Low-Pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:460-465.
6. Hong S, Kang SY, Ma KT, Seong GJ, Kim CY. Latent asymmetric intraocular pressure as a predictor of visual field defects. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1211-1215.
7. Susanna R Jr, Hatanaka M, Vessani RM, Pinheiro A, Morita C. Correlation of asymmetric glaucomatous visual field damage and water-drinking test response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47: 641-644.
8. Sullivan-Mee M, Gentry JM, Qualls C. Relationship between symmetric central corneal thickness and glaucomatous visual field loss within the same patient. Optom Vis Sci. 2006 83:516-519.
9. Sullivan-Mee M, Halverson KD, Qualls C. Clinical comparison of Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:694-699.
10. O'Brien C, Saxton V, Crick RP, Meire H. Doppler carotid artery studies in asymmetric glaucoma. Eye. 1992;6:273-276.
11. Plange N, Kaup M, Arend O, Remky A. Asymmetric visual field loss and retrobulbar haemodynamics in primary open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244:978-983.
12. Breil P, Krummenauer F, Schmitz S, Pfeiffer N. The relationship between retrobulbar blood flow velocities and glaucoma damage: an intraindivudual comparison. Ophthalmologe. 2002;99:613-616.
13. Costa VP, Sergott RC, Smith M, et al. Color Doppler imaging in glaucoma patients with asymmetric optic cups. J Glaucoma. 1994; 3:S91-S97.
14. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:156-162.
15. Moreno-Montañés J, Maldonado MJ, García N, Mendiluce L, García-Gómez PJ, Seguí-Gómez M. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:968-974.
16. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Grover D, Quigley HA, Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:868-875.
17. Ang GS, Bochmann F, Townend J, Azuara-Blanco A. Corneal biomechanical properties in primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2008;17:259-262.
18. Mangouritsas G, Morphis G, Mourtzoukos S, Feretis E. Association between corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness in glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87: 901-905.
19. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2: Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1445-1455.
20. Lam AK, Chen D, Tse J. The usefulness of waveform score from the Ocular Response Analyzer. Optom Vis Sci. In press.
21. Hahn S, Azen S, Ying-Lai M, Varma R, Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. Central corneal thickness in Latinos. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1508-1512.
22. Broman AT, Congdon NG, Bandeen-Roche K, Quigley HA. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:581-588.
23. Laiquzzaman M, Bohjwani R, Cunliffe I, Shah S. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects: relevance in clinical context. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;34:114-118.
24. Liu JH, Bouligny RP, Kripke DF, Weinreb RN. Nocturnal elevation of intraocular pressure is detectable in the sitting position. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4439-4442.
25. Mosaed S, Liu JH, Weinreb RN. Correlation between office and peak nocturnal intraocular pressures in healthy subjects and glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:320-324.
26. Lesk MR, Hafez AS, Descovich D. Relationship between central corneal thickness and changes of optic nerve head topography and blood flow after intraocular pressure reduction in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Arch Opththalmol. 2006;124: 1568-1572.
27. Bochmann F, Ang GS, Azuara-Blanco A. Lower corneal hysteresis in glaucoma patients with acquired pit of the optic nerve (APON). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246:735-738.
28. Wells AP, Garway-Heath DF, Poostchi A, Wong T, Chan KC, Sachdev N. Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3262-3268.
29. Downs JC, Suh JK, Thomas KA, Bellezza AJ, Hart RT, Burgoyne CF. Viscoelastic material properties of the peripapillary sclera in normal and early-glaucoma monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:540-546.
30. Kuchtey J, Källberg ME, Gelatt KN, Rinkoski T, Komaromy AM, Kuchtey RW. Angiopoietin-like 7 secretion is induced by glaucoma stimuli and its concentration is elevated in glaucomatous aqueous humor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3438-3448.
31. Sun L, Shen M, Wang J, et al. Recovery of corneal hysteresis after reduction of intraocular pressure in chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:1061-1066.
32. Burgoyne CF, Quigley HA, Thompson HW, Vitale S, Varma R. Early changes in optic disc compliance and surface position in experimental glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1800-1809.
33. Glass DH, Roberts CJ, Litsky AS, Weber PA. A viscoelastic biomechanical model of the cornea describing the effect of viscosity and elasticity on hysteresis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3919-3926.
34. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:714-720.
35. Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, Gordon MO. Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1779-1788.
36. Mitchell P, Hourihan F, Sandbach J, Wang JJ. The relationship between glaucoma and myopia: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:2010-2015.
37. Shen M, Fan F, Xue A, Wang J, Zhou X, Lu F. Biomechanical properties of the cornea in high myopia. Vision Res. 2008;48: 2167-2171.
38. Haefliger IO, Hitchings RA. Relationship between asymmetry of visual field defects and intraocular pressure difference in an untreated normal (low) tension glaucoma population. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1990;68:564-567.
39. Crichton A, Drance SM, Douglas GR, Schulzer M. Unequal intraocular pressure and its relation to asymmetric visual field defects in low-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1989;96:1312-1314.