Measurement of viscoelastic corneal parameters (corneal hysteresis) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma;Bestimmung viskoelastischer Hornhauteigenschaften (korneale Hysterese) bei Patienten mit primärem Offenwinkelglaukom

Ophthalmologe

Volumn 105, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 916-920

  Schroeder, B ^a   Hager, A ^a   Kutschan, A ^a   Wiegand, W ^a  

^a Asklepios Klinik Nord Heidberg   (Germany)

Author keywords

Corneal biomechanics; Corneal hysteresis; Dynamic tonometry; Ocular response analyzer; Open angle glaucoma

Indexed keywords

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT;

AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; DRUG EFFECT; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REFERENCE VALUE; VISCOSITY;

AGED; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE VALUES; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; VISCOSITY;

EID: 63349107518     PISSN: 0941293X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00347-008-1690-6     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K et al. (2006) Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol 141: 868-875.
2. Hager A, Schroeder B, Sadeghi M et al. (2007) Der Einfluß von kornealer Hysterese und kornealem Resistenzfaktor auf die Messung des intaokularen Druckes. Ophthalmologe 104: 484-489.
3. Hager A, Loge K, Füllhas M et al. (2007) Changes in corneal hysteresis after clear corneal cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 144: 341-346.
4. Kirwan C, O'Keefe M, Lanigan B (2006) Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the Reichert ocular response analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol 142: 990-992.
5. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR et al. (2006) Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47: 5337-5347.
6. Luce DA (2005) Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cat Refract Surg 31: 156-162.
7. Martinez de la Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez-Vidal A et al. (2006) Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47: 4410-4414.
8. Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN 2006 Evaluation of the influence of corneal properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer. J Glaucoma 15: 364-370.
9. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA et al. 2007 Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 143: 39-47.
10. Randleman JB (2006) Post-laser in-situ keratomileusis ectasia: current understanding and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 17: 406-412.
11. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I et al. (2006) The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 29: 257-262.