The solvated interaction energy method for scoring binding affinities

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 819, Issue , 2012, Pages 295-303

  Sulea, Traian ^a   Purisima, Enrico O ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Binding free energy; Molecular dynamics; Protein ligand binding; Scoring function

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEIN BINDING; THERMODYNAMICS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; SOLVENTS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84855965213     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-465-0_19     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ferrara, P., Gohlke, H., et al. (2004) Assessing Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Interactions, J. Med. Chem. 47, 3032-3047. (Pubitemid 38702700)
2. Wang, R., Lu, Y., et al. (2004) An Extensive Test of 14 Scoring Functions Using the PDBbind Refined Set of 800 Protein-Ligand Complexes, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44 2114-2125.
3. Warren, G. L., Andrews, C.W., et al. (2006) A Critical Assessment of Docking Programs and Scoring Functions, J. Med. Chem. 49, 5912-5931. (Pubitemid 44484938)
4. Gohlke, H., and Klebe, G. (2002) Approaches to the Description and Prediction of the Binding Affinity of Small-Molecule Ligands to Macromolecular Receptors, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 2644-2676.
5. Böhm, H. J. (1994) The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 8, 243-256.
6. Head, R. D., Smythe, M. L., et al. (1996) VALIDATE: A New Method for the Receptor-Based Prediction of Binding Affinities of Novel Ligands, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 118, 3959-3969. (Pubitemid 26168541)
7. Tokarski, J. S., and Hopfinger, A. J. (1997) Prediction of Ligand-Receptor Binding Thermodynamics by Free Energy Force Field (FEFF) 3D-QSAR Analysis: Application to a Set of Peptidometic Renin Inhibitors, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37, 792-811. (Pubitemid 127603594)
8. Eldridge, M. D., Murray, C. W., et al. (1997) Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 11, 425-445. (Pubitemid 127505895)
9. Wang, R., Lai, L., and Wang, S. (2002) Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 16, 11-26. (Pubitemid 34855041)
10. Hwang, J. K., and Warshel, A. (1987) Semiquantitative Calculations of Catalytic Free Energies in Genetically Modified Enzymes, Biochemistry 26, 2669-2673.
11. Gohlke, H., and Klebe, G. (2001) Statistical potentials and scoring functions applied to protein-ligand binding, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11, 231-235. (Pubitemid 32289427)
12. Huang, S.-Y., and Zou, X. (2010) Mean-force scoring functions for protein-ligand binding, Annu. Rep. Comput. Chem. 6, 281-296.
13. Muegge, I., and Martin, Y. C. (1999) A General and Fast Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Interactions: A Simplified Potential Approach, J. Med. Chem. 42, 791-804. (Pubitemid 29136170)
14. Huang, S.-Y., and Zou, X. (2010) Inclusion of Solvation and Entropy in the Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Interactions, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 50, 262-273.
15. Ishchenko, A. V., and Shakhnovich, E. I. (2002) SMall Molecule Growth 2001 (SMoG2001): An Improved Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Interactions, J. Med. Chem. 45, 2770-2780. (Pubitemid 34627647)
16. Naïm, M., Bhat, S., et al. (2007) Solvated interaction energy (SIE) for scoring proteinligand binding affinities. 1. Exploring the parameter space, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 47, 122-133. (Pubitemid 46225568)
17. Cui, Q., Sulea, T., et al. (2008) Molecular Dynamics -Solvated Interaction Energy Studies of Protein-Protein Interactions: the MP1-p14 Scaffolding Complex, J. Mol. Biol 379, 787-802.
18. Zou, X., Sun, Y., and Kuntz, I. D. (1999) Inclusion of Solvation in Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations Using the Generalized-Born Model, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 121, 8033-8043.
19. Kollman, P. A., Massova, I., et al. (2000) Calculating Structures and Free Energies of Complex Molecules: Combining Molecular Mechanics and Continuum Models, Acc. Chem. Res. 33, 889-897. (Pubitemid 32056774)
20. Kuhn, B., Gerber, P., et al. (2005) Validation and Use of the MM-PBSA Approach for Drug Discovery, J. Med. Chem. 48 4040-4048. (Pubitemid 40800612)
21. Gohlke, H., and Case, D. A. (2004) Converging free energy estimates: MM-PB(GB)SA studies on the protein-protein complex Ras-Raf, J. Comput. Chem. 25, 238-250.
22. Åqvist, J., Luzhkov, V. B., and Brandsdal, B. O. (2002) Ligand Binding Affinities from MD Simulations, Acc. Chem. Res. 35, 358-365.
23. Gilson, M. K., and Zhou, H. X. (2007) Calculation of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 36, 21-42. (Pubitemid 46998108)
24. Chang, C. E., and Gilson, M. K. (2004) Free Energy, Entropy, and Induced Fit in Host-Guest Recognition: Calculations with the Second-Generation Mining Minima Algorithm, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 126, 13156-13164. (Pubitemid 39372346)
25. Chen, W., Chang, C. E., and Gilson, M. K. (2004) Calculation of Cyclodextrin Binding Affinities: Energy, Entropy, and Implications for Drug Design, Biophys. J. 87, 3035-3049. (Pubitemid 40468563)
26. Jakalian, A., Jack, D. B., and Bayly, C. I. (2002) Fast, Efficient Generation of High-Quality Atomic Charges. AM1-BCC Model: II. Parameterization and validation, J. Comput. Chem. 23, 1623-1641. (Pubitemid 35330860)
27. Bayly, C. I., Cieplak, P., et al. (1993) A Well-Behaved Electrostatic Potential Based Method Using Charge Restraints for Deriving Atomic Charges: The RESP Model, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 10269-10280.
28. Hornak, V., Abel, R., et al. (2006) Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters, Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 65, 712-725. (Pubitemid 44583220)
29. Wang, J., Wolf, R. M., et al. (2004) Development and testing of a general amber force field, J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1157-1174.
30. Duan, Y., Wu, C., et al. (2003) A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations, J. Comput. Chem. 24, 1999-2012.
31. Genheden, S., and Ryde, U. (2010) How to obtain statistically converged MM/GBSA results, J. Comput. Chem. 31, 837-846.
32. Sadiq, S. K., Wright, D. W., et al. (2010) Accurate Ensemble Molecular Dynamics Binding Free Energy Ranking of Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1 Proteases, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 50, 890-905.
33. Wang, Y. T., Su, Z. Y., et al. (2009) Predictions of Binding for Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists by the SIE Method, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 49, 2369-2375.
34. Wimmerová, M., Mishra, N., et al. (2009) Importance of oligomerisation on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lectin-II binding affinity. In silico and in vitro mutagenesis, J. Mol. Model. 15, 673-679.
35. Mishra, N. K., Kríz, Z., et al. (2010) Recognition of selected monosaccharides by Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lectin II analyzed by molecular dynamics and free energy calculations, Carbohydr. Res. 345, 1432-1441.
36. Rodriguez-Granillo, A., Sedlak, E., and Wittung-Stafshede, P. (2008) Stability and ATP Binding of the Nucleotide-binding Domain of the Wilson Disease Protein: Effect of the Common H1069Q Mutation, J. Mol. Biol. 383, 1097-1111.
37. Wei, C., Mei, Y., and Zhang, D. (2010) Theoretical study on the HIV-1 integrase-5CITEP complex based on polarized force fields, Chem. Phys. Lett. 495, 121-124.
38. Lecaille, F., Chowdhury, S., et al. (2007) The S2 subsites of cathepsins K and L and their contribution to collagen degradation, Protein Sci. 16, 662-670. (Pubitemid 46506995)
39. Nguyen, M., Marcellus, R. C., et al. (2007) Small molecule obatoclax (GX15-070) antagonizes MCL-1 and overcomes MCL-1-mediated resistance to apoptosis, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 19512-19517.
40. Okamoto, M., Takayama, K., et al. (2010) Structure-activity relationship of novel DAPK inhibitors identified by structure-based virtual screening, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 18, 2728-2734.