Mean-force scoring functions for protein-ligand binding

Annual Reports in Computational Chemistry

Volumn 6, Issue C, 2010, Pages 280-296

  Huang, Sheng You ^a   Zou, Xiaoqin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Mean force; Molecular docking; Protein ligand interactions; Reference state; Scoring functions

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955800755     PISSN: 15741400     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1574-1400(10)06014-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Brooijmans N., Kuntz I.D. Molecular recognition and docking algorithms. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2003, 32:335-373.
2. Böhm H.J., Stahl M. The use of scoring functions in drug discovery applications. Rev. Comput. Chem. 2002, 18:41-87.
3. Wang W., Donini O., Reyes C.M., Kollman P.A. Biomolecular simulations: Recent developments in force fields, simulations of enzyme catalysis, protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-nucleic acid noncovalent interactions. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2001, 30:211-243.
4. Shoichet B.K., McGovern S.L., Wei B., Irwin J.J. Lead discovery using molecular docking. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002, 6:439-446.
5. Reddy M.R., Erion M.D. Free Energy Calculations in Rational Drug Design 2001, Kluwer Academic, New York.
6. Seifert M.H.J., Kraus J., Kramer B. Virtual high-throughput screening of molecular databases. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel. 2007, 10:298-307.
7. Jain A.N. Scoring functions for protein-ligand docking. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2006, 7:407-420.
8. Schulz-Gasch T., Stahl M. Scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions: A critical perspective. Drug Discov. Today Technol. 2004, 1:231-239.
9. Rajamani R., Good A.C. Ranking poses in structure-based lead discovery and optimization: Current trends in scoring function development. Curr. Opin. Drug. Discov. Devel. 2007, 10:308-315.
10. Gohlke H., Klebe G. Statistical potentials and scoring functions applied to protein-ligand binding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2001, 11:231-235.
11. Gilson M.K., Zhou H.X. Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2007, 36:21-42.
12. Meng E.C., Shoichet B.K., Kuntz I.D. Automated docking with grid-based energy approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13:505-524.
13. Goodsell D.S., Olson A.J. Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing. Proteins 1990, 8:195-202.
14. Zou X., Sun Y., Kuntz I.D. Inclusion of solvation in ligand binding free energy calculations using the generalized-Born model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121:8033-8043.
15. Wei B.Q., Baase W.A., Weaver L.H., Matthews B.W., Shoichet B.K. A model binding site for testing scoring functions in molecular docking. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 322:339-355.
16. Liu H.-Y., Kuntz I.D., Zou X. Pairwise GB/SA scoring function for structure-based drug design. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108:5453-5462.
17. Kuhn B., Gerber P., Schulz-Gasch T., Stahl M. Validation and use of the MM-PBSA approach for drug discovery. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48:4040-4048.
18. Liu H.-Y., Zou X. Electrostatics of ligand binding: Parametrization of the generalized born model and comparison with the Poisson-Boltzmann approach. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110:9304-9313.
19. Liu H.-Y., Grinter S.Z., Zou X. Multiscale generalized Born modeling of ligand binding energies for virtual database screening. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113:11793-11799.
20. Lyne P.D., Lamb M.L., Saeh J.C. Accurate prediction of the relative potencies of members of a series of kinase inhibitors using molecular docking and MM-GBSA scoring. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49:4805-4808.
21. Guimaraes C.R.W., Cardozo M. MM-GB/SA rescoring of docking poses in structure-based lead optimization. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48:958-970.
22. Thompson D.C., Humblet C., Joseph-McCarthy D. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48:1081-1091.
23. Weiner P.K., Kollman P.A. AMBER-assisted model building with energy refinement¡ a general program for modeling molecules and their interactions. J. Comput. Chem. 1981, 2:287-303.
24. Weiner S.J., Kollman P.A., Case D.A., Singh U.C., Ghio C., Alagona G., Profeta S., Weiner P. A new force-field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic-acids and proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106:765-784.
25. Weiner S.J., Kollman P.A., Nguyen D.T., Case D.A. An all-atom force field for simulations of protein and nucleic acids. J. Comput. Chem. 1986, 7:230-252.
26. Nilsson L., Karplus M. Empirical energy functions for energy minimization and dynamics of nucleic acids. J. Comput. Chem. 1986, 7:591-616.
27. Brooks B.R., Bruccoleri R.E., Olafson B.D., States D.J., Swaminathan S., Karplus M. CHARMM a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 1983, 4:187-217.
28. Jain A.N. Scoring noncovalent protein-ligand interactions: A continuous differentiable function tuned to compute binding affinities. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 1996, 10:427-440.
29. Head R.D., Smythe M.L., Oprea T.I., Waller C.L., Green S.M., Marshall G.R. Validate a new method for the receptor-based prediction of binding affinities of novel ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118:3959-3969.
30. Eldridge M.D., Murray C.W., Auton T.R., Paolini G.V., Mee R.P. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11:425-445.
31. Böhm H.J. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8:243-256.
32. Wang R., Liu L., Lai L., Tang Y. SCORE: A new empirical method for estimating the binding affinity of a protein-ligand complex. J. Mol. Model. 1998, 4:379-394.
33. Böhm H.J. Prediction of binding constants of ptotein ligands: A fast method for the polarization of hits obtained from de novo design or 3D database search programs. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 1998, 12:309-323.
34. Gehlhaar D.K., Verkhivker G.M., Rejto P.A., Sherman C.J., Fogel D.B., Freer S.T. Molecular recognition of the inhibitor AG-1343 by HIV-1 Protease: Conformationally flexible docking by evolutionary programming. Chem. Biol. 1995, 2:317-324.
35. Gehlhaar D.K., Bouzida D., Rejto P.A. Rational Drug Design: Novel Methodology and Practical Applications 1999, 292-311. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. L. Parrill, M.R. Reddy (Eds.).
36. Wang R., Lai L., Wang S. Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16:11-26.
37. Tanaka S., Scheraga H.A. Medium- and long-range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three-dimensional structures of proteins. Macromolecules 1976, 9:945-950.
38. Miyazawa S., Jernigan R.L. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: Quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985, 18:534-552.
39. Sippl M.J. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 213:859-883.
40. Berman H.M., Westbrook J., Feng Z., Gilliland G., Bhat T.N., Weissig H., Shindyalov I.N., Bourne P.E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28:235-242.
41. McQuarrie D.A. Statistical Mechanics 1976, Harper Collins Publishers, New York.
42. Hendlich M., Lackner P., Weitckus S., Floeckner H., Froschauer R., Gottsbacher K., Casari G., Sippl M.J. Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models. The calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 216:167-180.
43. Jones D.T., Taylor W.R., Thornton J.M. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992, 358:86-89.
44. Thomas P.D., Dill K.A. An iterative method for extracting energy-like quantities from protein structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93:11628-11633.
45. Thomas P.D., Dill K.A. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: How accurate are they?. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 257:457-469.
46. Li X., Liang J. Computational Methods for Protein Structure Prediction and Modeling 2006, Vol. 1:71-124. Springer, New York. Y. Xu, D. Xu, J. Liang (Eds.).
47. Muegge I., Martin Y.C. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: A simplified potential approach. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42:791-804.
48. Huang S.-Y., Zou X. Inclusion of solvation and entropy in the knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50:262-273.
49. Huang S.-Y., Zou X. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions: I. Derivation of interaction potentials. J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27:1865-1875.
50. Huang S.-Y., Zou X. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions: II. Validation of the scoring function. J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27:1876-1882.
51. CSD -knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48:6296-6303.
52. Gohlke H., Hendlich M., Klebe G. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 295:337-356.
53. Ishchenko A.V., Shakhnovich Small E.I. molecule growth 2001 (SMoG2001): An improved knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45:2770-2780.
54. Mitchell J.B.O., Laskowski R.A., Alex A., Thornton J.M. BLEEP-Potential of mean force describing protein-ligand interactions: I. Generating potential. J. Comput. Chem. 1999, 20:1165-1176.
55. Mitchell J.B.O., Laskowski R.A., Alex A., Forster M.J., Thornton J.M. BLEEP-Potential of mean force describing protein-ligand interactions: II. Calculation of binding energies and comparison with experimental data. J. Comput. Chem. 1999, 20:1177-1185.
56. Zhang C., Liu S., Zhu Q., Zhou Y. A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48:2325-2335.
57. Zhao X., Liu X., Wang Y., Chen Z., Kang L., Zhang H., Luo X., Zhu W., Chen K., Li H., Wang X., Jiang H. An improved PMF scoring function for universally predicting the interactions of a ligand with protein, DNA, and RNA. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48:1438-1447.
58. Verkhivker G., Appelt K., Freer S.T., Villafranca J.E. Empirical free eenrgy calculations of ligand-protein crystallographic complexes. I. Knowledge-based ligand-protein interaction potentials applied to the prediction of human immunodeficiency virus 1 protease binding affinity. Protein Eng. 1995, 8:677-691.
59. DeWitte R.S., Shakhnovich E.I. SMoG: de Novo design method based on simple, fast, and accutate free energy estimate. 1. Methodology and supporting evidence. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118:11733-11744.
60. Nobeli I., Mitchell J.B.O., Alex A., Thornton J.M. Evaluation of a knowledge-based potential of mean force for scoring docked protein-ligand complexes. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22:673-688.
61. Sotriffer C.A., Gohlke H., Klebe G. Docking into knowledge-based potential fields: A comparative evaluation of DrugScore. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45:1967-1970.
62. Allen F.H. The Cambridge Structural Database: A quarter of a million crystal structures and rising. Acta Crystallogr. 2002, B58:380-388.
63. Yang C.-Y., Wang R., Wang S. M-Score: A new knowledge-based potential scoring function accounting for protein atom mobility. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49:5903-5911.
64. Mooij W.T., Verdonk M.L. General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions. Proteins 2005, 61:272-287.
65. Muegge I., Martin Y.C., Hajduk P.J., Fesik S.W. Evaluation of PMF scoring in docking weak ligands to the FK506 binding protein. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42:2498-2503.
66. Ha S., Andreani R., Robbins A., Muegge I. Evaluation of docking/scoring approaches: A comparative study based on MMP3 inhibitors. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2000, 14:435-448.
67. Muegge I. PMF scoring revisited. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49:5895-5902.
68. Zhou H., Zhou Y. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci. 2002, 11:2714-2726.
69. Wang R., Lu Y., Wang S. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46:2287-2303.
70. Huang S.-Y., Zou X. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: Considering protein structural variations in molecular docking. Proteins 2007, 66:399-421.
71. Huang S.-Y., Zou X. Efficient molecular docking of NMR structures: Application to HIV-1 protease. Protein Sci. 2007, 16:43-51.
72. Huang S.-Y., Zou X. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function for protein-protein recognition. Proteins 2008, 72:557-579.
73. Jasobsson M., Lidén P., Stjernschantz E., Boström H., Norinder U. Improving structure-based virtual screening by multivariate analysis of scoring data. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46:5781-5789.