The role of intentions for the automatic processing of visuospatial stimulus information;Die Rolle von absichten bei der automatischen verarbeitung visuell-räumlicher reizinformation

Psychologische Rundschau

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 2-12

  Ansorge, Ulrich ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; Intention; Selective attention; Spatial compatibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645030497     PISSN: 00333042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/0033-3042.57.1.2     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Ansorge, U. (2002). Spatial intention-response compatibility. Acta Psychologica 109, 285-299.
2. Ansorge, U. (2003 a). Asymmetric influences of temporally vs. nasally presented masked visual information: Evidence for collicular contributions to nonconscious priming effects. Brain and Cognition, 57, 317-325.
3. Ansorge, U. (2003 b). Influences of response-activating stimuli and passage of time on the Simon effect. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 67, 174-183.
4. Ansorge, U. (2003 c). Spatial Simon effects and compatibility effects induced by observed gaze direction. Visual Cognition, 10, 363-383.
5. Ansorge, U. (2004). Top-down contingencies of nonconscious priming revealed by dual-task interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1123-1148.
6. Ansorge, U. & Heumann, M. (2003). Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 937-948.
7. Ansorge, U. & Heumann, M. (2004). Peripheral cuing by abrupt-onset cues: The role of color in S-R corresponding conditions. Acta Psychologica, 116, 115-132.
8. Ansorge, U., Heumann, M. & Scharlau, I. (2002). Influences of visibility, intentions, and probability in a peripheral cuing task. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 528-545.
9. Ansorge, U., Horstmann, G. & Carbone, E. (in press). Top-down contingent capture by color: Evidence from RT distribution analyses in a manual choice reaction task. Acta Psychologica.
10. Ansorge, U., Klotz, W. & Neumann, O. (1998). Manual and verbal responses to completely masked (unreportable) stimuli: Exploring some conditions for the metacontrast dissociation. Perception, 27, 1177-1189.
11. Ansorge, U. & Neumann, O. (2001). Intentions determine the effect of nonconsciously registered visual information: Evidence for direct parameter specification in the metacontrast dissociation. Proceedings of the AISB '01 Symposium on nonconscious intelligence: from natural to artificial (pp. 1-8). York, UK: AISB.
12. Ansorge, U. & Neumann, O. (in press). Intentions determine the effect of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: Evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral-cueing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
13. Ansorge, U., Scharlau, I., Heumann, M. & Klotz, W. (2001). Visual conscious perception could be grounded in a nonconscious sensorimotor domain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 974-975.
14. Ansorge, U. & Wühr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 365-377.
15. Bosbach, S., Prinz, W. & Kerzel, D. (2004). A Simon-effect with stationary moving stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 39-55.
16. Brass, M., Bekkering, H. & Prinz, W. (2001). Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica, 106, 3-22.
17. Duncan, J. & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
18. Eimer, M. (1997). Uninformative symbolic cues may bias visual-spatial attention: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Biological Psychology, 46, 67-71.
19. Engbert, R. & Kliegl, R. (2004). Microsaccades keep the eye's balance during fixation. Psychological Science, 15, 431-436.
20. Fitts, P. M. & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
21. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W. & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
22. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Helmholtz, H. v. (1895). Über den Ursprung der richtigen Deutung unserer Sinneseindrücke. Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen (Dritter Band, S. 536-553). Leipzig: Barth.
24. Hommel, B. (1993 a). Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 55, 270-279.
25. Hommel, B. (1993b). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 55, 280-290.
26. Hommel, B. (1996). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 546-571.
27. Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 247-273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G. & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878.
29. Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and Performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Klotz, W. & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976-992.
31. Klotz, W. & Wolff, P. (1995). The effect of a masked stimulus on the response to the masking stimulus. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 58, 92-101.
32. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T. & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
33. Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 387-394.
34. Leuthold, H. & Kopp, B. (1998). Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related brain potentials. Psychological Science, 9, 263-269.
35. Lu, C.-H. & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
36. Marble, J. G. & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Mixing location-relevant and location-irrelevant choice-reaction tasks: Influences of location mapping on the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1515-1533.
37. Martinez-Conde, S., Macknik, S. L. & Hubel, D. H. (2004). The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 229-240.
38. McCormick, P. A. (1997). Orienting attention without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 168-180.
39. Müller, H. J. & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315-330.
40. Neumann, O. (1984). Automatic processing: A review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and motor processes (pp. 255-293). Berlin: Springer.
41. Neumann, O. (1990 a). Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 52, 207-215.
42. Neumann, O. (1990b). Visual attention and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 227-267). Berlin: Springer.
43. Neumann, O. & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV (pp. 123-150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Pashler, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32A, 3-25.
46. Posner, M. I. & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Posner, M. I. & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Pratt, J. & Hommel, B. (2003). Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 835-845.
49. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
50. Pylyshyn, Z. (1999). Is vision continuous with cognition? The case of impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 341-423.
51. Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C. & Yantis, S. (1992). Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 279-290.
52. Rossetti, Y. (1998). Implicit short-lived motor representations of space in brain damaged and healthy subjects. Consciousness and Cognition, 7, 520-558.
53. Scharlau, I. (2002). Leading, but not trailing, primes influence temporal order perception: Further evidence for an attentional account of perceptual latency priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1346-1360.
54. Scharlau, I. & Ansorge, U. (2003). Direct parameter specification of an attention shift: Evidence from perceptual latency priming. Vision Research, 43, 1351-1363.
55. Scharlau, I. & Neumann, O. (2003). Perceptual latency priming by metacontrast-masked and unmasked stimuli: Evidence for an attentional interpretation. Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung, 67, 184-196.
56. Schmidt, T. (2002). The finger in flight: Real-time motor control by visually masked color stimuli. Psychological Science, 13, 112-117.
57. Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C. & Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of LTM links and STM links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 648-670.
58. Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P. & Kramer, A. F. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVIII (pp. 105-125). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Warner, C. B., Juola, J. F. & Koshino, H. (1990). Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 243-251.
60. Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63-102). New York: Academic Press.
61. Wolff, P. (2004). Position of code and code for position: From isomorphism to a sensorimotor account of space perception. Visual Cognition, 11, 137-160.
62. Yantis, S. & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 70, 601-621.