Trust My Face: Cognitive Factors of Head Fakes in Sports

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 110-127

  Kunde, Wilfried ^a   Skirde, Stefanie ^b   Weigelt, Matthias ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Deception; Motor response; Reaction time; Sport psychology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DECEPTION; FEMALE; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPORT; TRUST; VISION;

ADULT; DECEPTION; FEMALE; HEAD MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPORTS; TRUST; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79959876807     PISSN: 1076898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0023756     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Aglioti S.M., Cesari P., Romani M., Urgesi C. Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience 2008, 11:1109-1116.
2. Ansorge U. Spatial Simon effects and compatibility effects induced by observed gaze direction. Visual Cognition 2003, 10:363-383.
3. Ansorge U., Wühr P. A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:365-377.
4. Baron-Cohen S. How to build a baby that can read minds: Cognitive mechanisms in mindreading. Current Psychology of Cognition 1984, 13:513-552.
5. Blakemore S.J., Winston J., Frith U. Social cognitive neuroscience: Where are we heading?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:216-222.
6. Calvo-Merino B., Glaser D.E., Grezes J., Passingham R.E., Haggard P. Action observation and acquired motor skills: An FMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15:1243-1249.
7. Calvo-Merino B., Grezes J., Glaser D.E., Passingham R.E., Haggard P. Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology 2006, 16:1905-1910.
8. Canal-Bruland R., Schmidt M. Response bias in judging deceptive movements. Acta Psychologica 2009, 130:235-240.
9. Canal-Bruland R., van der Kamp J., van Kesteren J. An examination of motor and perceptual contributions to the recognition of deception from other's actions. Human Movement Science 2010, 29:94-102.
10. Cutting J.E., Kozlowski L.T. Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1977, 9:353-356.
11. de Jong R., Liang C.C., Lauber E. Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:731-750.
12. De Houwer J. On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect. Memory and Cognition 2003, 31:353-359.
13. Dittrich W.H., Troscianko T., Lea S.E.G., Morgan D. Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception 1996, 25:727-738.
14. Egner T. Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2007, 7:380-390.
15. Egner T. Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12:374-380.
16. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993, 18:1030-1044.
17. Ganel T., Goodale M.A. Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape. Nature 2003, 426:664-669.
18. Gervais W.M., Reed C.L., Beall P.M., Roberts R.J. Implied body action directs spatial attention. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 2010, 6:1437-1443.
19. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Donchin E. Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1992, 121:480-506.
20. Hala S., Russell J. Executive control within strategic deception: A window on early cognitive development?. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2001, 80:112-141.
21. Heyes C. Evolution, development and intentional control of imitation. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Theme issue 2009 2009, 364:2291-2443.
22. Hietanen J.K. Social attention orienting integrates visual information from head and body orientation. Psychological Research 2002, 66:174-179.
23. Hommel B. Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research 1994, 56:261-268.
24. Hommel B. S-R compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:764-775.
25. Hommel B., Proctor R.W., Vu K.-P.L. A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research 2004, 68:1-17.
26. Iacoboni M., Woods R.P., Brass M., Bekkering H., Mazziotta J.C., Rizzolatti G. Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science 1999, 286:2526-2528.
27. Jackson R.C., Warren S., Abernethy B. Anticipation skill and susceptibility to deceptive movements. Acta Psychologica 2006, 123:355-371.
28. Kerns J.C., Cohen J.D., MacDonald A.W., Cho R.Y., Stenger V.A., Carter C.S. Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 2004, 303:1023-1026.
29. Kleinsorge T. Anticipation selectively enhances interference exerted by pictures of negative valence. Experimental Psychology 2009, 56:228-235.
30. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 1990, 97:253-270.
31. Kunde W., Landgraf F., Paelecke M., Kiesel A. Dorsal and ventral processing under dual-task conditions. Psychological Science 2007, 18:100-104.
32. Kunde W., Stöcker C. A Simon effect for stimulus-response duration. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2002, 55A:581-592.
33. Kunde W., Wühr P. Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks. Memory & Cognition 2006, 34:356-367.
34. Langton S.R.H. The mutual influence of gaze and head orientation in the analysis of social attention direction. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2000, 534:825-845.
35. Langton S.R.H., Watt R.J., Bruce V. Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention. Trends in Cognitive Science 2000, 4:50-59.
36. Lien M.C., Proctor R.W. Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:1260-1280.
37. Liepelt R., Prinz W., Brass M. When do we simulate non-human agents? Dissociating communicative and non-communicative actions. Cognition 2010, 115:426-434.
38. Liepelt R., von Cramon D.Y., Brass M. What is matched in direct matching? Intention attribution modulates motor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:578-591.
39. Masters R.S.W., van der Kamp J., Jackson R.C. Imperceptibly off-center goalkeepers influence penalty-kick direction in soccer. Psychological Science 2007, 18:222-223.
40. McCann R.S., Johnston J.C. Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:471-484.
41. McCann R.S., Remington R.W., Van Selst M. A dual task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:1352-1370.
42. Meltzoff A.N., Moore M.K. Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 1977, 198:75-78.
43. Miller J., Reynolds A. The locus of redundant-targets and nontargets effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:1126-1142.
44. Miller J.O., Pachella R.G. Locus of the stimulus probability effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1973, 101(2):227-231.
45. Morris P.H., Lewis D. Tackling diving: The perception of deceptive intentions in association football (soccer). Journal Nonverbal Behaviour 2010, 34:1-13.
46. Oberfeld D., Hecht H. Effects of a moving distractor object on time-to-contact judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:605-623.
47. Paelecke M., Kunde W. Action-effect codes in and before the central bottleneck: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:627-644.
48. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin 1984, 116:220-244.
49. Pashler H., Johnston J. Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1989, 41A:19-45.
50. Prinz W. Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1997, 9:129-154.
51. Proctor R.W., Cho Y.S. Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin 2006, 132:416-442.
52. Ratcliff R. Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin 1979, 86:446-461.
53. Ridderinkhof K.R. Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention & performance 2002, XIX:494-519. Oxford University Press, Oxford. W. Prinz, B. Hommel (Eds.).
54. Ripoll H., Kerlirzin Y., Stein J.F., Reine B. Analysis of information processing, decision making, and visual strategies in complex problem solving sport situation. Human Movements Science 1995, 14:325-349.
55. Rizzolatti G., Riggio L., Dascola I., Umiltà C. Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia Special Issue: Selective visual attention 1987, 25:31-40.
56. Rubichi S., Nicoletti R., Iani C., Umiltà C. The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23:1353-1364.
57. Schmidt R.A., Lee T.D. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis 2005, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL. 4th ed.
58. Schmidt R.A., Wrisberg C.A. Motor learning and performance 2008, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL. 4th ed.
59. Sebanz N., Shiffrar M. Detecting deception in a bluffing body: The role of expertise. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16:170-175.
60. Simon J.R., Mewaldt S.P., Acosta E., Hu J.-M. Processing auditory information: Interaction of two population stereotypes. Journal of Applied Psychology 1976, 61:354-358.
61. Simon J.R., Rudell A.P. The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology 1967, 51:300-304.
62. Simon J.R., Berbaum K. Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: The " Stroop effect" vs. the " Simon effect." Acta Psychologica 1990, 73:159-170.
63. Sternberg S. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica 1969, 30:276-315.
64. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935, 18:643-662.
65. Stuermer B., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: A study of imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:1746-1759.
66. Stuermer B., Leuthold H., Soetens E., Schröter H., Sommer W. Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:1345-1363.
67. Treisman A., Gelade G. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 1980, 12:97-136.
68. Ulrich R., Miller J. Effects of truncation on reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1994, 123:24-80.
69. Van Maanen L., Van Rijn H., Borst J.P. Stroop and picture-word interference are two sides of the same coin. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16:987-999.
70. Vogt S., Taylor P., Hopkins B. Visuomotor priming by pictures of hands: Perspective matters. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:941-951.
71. Welford A.T. The 'psychological refractory period' and the timing of high-speed performance: A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology 1952, 43:2-19.
72. Wühr P., Kunde W. Pre-cueing spatial S-R correspondence: Is there regulation of expected response conflict?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:872-883.
73. Zorzi M., Mapelli D., Rusconi E., Umiltà C. Automatic spatial coding of perceived gaze direction is revealed by the Simon effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:423-429.