An efficient student model based on student performance and metadata

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 178, Issue , 2008, Pages 276-280

  Faulhaber, Arndt ^b   Melis, Erica ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; E-LEARNING; STUDENTS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ADAPTIVE WEB; CONTENT REPRESENTATION; DOMAIN STRUCTURE; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; MODEL-BASED OPC; MODELING TECHNOLOGY; PEDAGOGICAL STRUCTURE; STUDENT MODELING; STUDENT PERFORMANCE; WEB-BASED LEARNING PLATFORMS;

METADATA;

EID: 84855895570     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-58603-891-5-276     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 33–40, (2005).
2. M.C. Desmarais and M. Gagnon, ‘Bayesian student models based on item to item knowledge structures’, in EC-TEL 2006, eds., W. Nejdl and K. Tochtermann, volume 4227 of LNCS, pp. 111–124. Springer-Verlag, (2006).
3. A. Faulhaber, Building a new Learner Model for ActiveMath Combining Transferable Belief Model and Item Response Theory, Master’s thesis, Saarland University, 2007.
4. G. Goguadze, C. Ullrich, E. Melis, J. Siekmann, C. Groß, and R. Morales, ‘Leactivemath structure and metadata model’. Deliverable D6 for LeActiveMath project, 2004.
5. st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-06), Boston, MA, (2006).
6. A. Jonsson, J. Johns, H. Mehranian, I. Arroyo, B.P. Woolf, A. Barto, D. Fisher, and S. Mahade-van, ‘Evaluating the feasibility of learning student models from data’, in AAAI Workshop on Educational Data Mining, ed., J. Beck, pp. 1–6, (2005).
7. N. Van Labeke, P Brna, and R. Morales, ‘Opening up the interpretation process in an open learner model’, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17(3), 305–338, (2007).
8. F.M. Lord, Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems, Hillsdale, NJ: Erl-baum, 1980.
9. E. Melis, G. Goguadze, M. Homik, P. Libbrecht, C. Ullrich, and S. Winterstein, ‘Semantic-aware components and services of activemath’, British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3), 405–423, (may 2006).
10. Learning for Tomorrows World – First Results from PISA 2003, ed., OECD, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Publishing, 2004.
11. Z.A. Pardos, N.T. Heffernan, B. Anderson, and C.L. Heffernan, ‘Using fine-grained skill models to fit student performance with bayesian networks’, in Educational Datamining Workshop, at ITS-2006, pp. 5–12, (2006).
12. J. Pearl, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan Kauffman, 1988.
13. G. Rasch. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Paed-agogiske Institute, 1960.
14. G. Shafer, A mathematical theory of evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1976.
15. P. Smets and R. Kennes, ‘The transferable belief model’, Artificial Intelligence, 66, 191–234, (1994).
16. C. Ullrich, ‘The learning-resource-type is dead, long live the learning- resource-type!’, Learning Objects and Learning Designs, 1(1), 7–15, (2005).
17. L. Zadeh, ‘The role of fuzzy logic in the management of uncertainty in expert systems’, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 199–227, (1983).