Evaluating the feasibility of learning student models from data

AAAI Workshop - Technical Report

Volumn WS-05-02, Issue , 2005, Pages 1-6

  Jonsson, Anders ^a   Johns, Jeff ^a   Mehranian, Hasmik ^b   Arroyo, Ivon ^a   Woolf, Beverly ^a   Barto, Andrew ^a   Fisher, Donald ^b   Mahadevan, Sridhar ^a  

^a Biologically Inspired Neural and Dynamical Systems Laboratory   (United States)

^b University of Massachusetts   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CODES (SYMBOLS); COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA ACQUISITION; DATA REDUCTION; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

CONDITIONAL PROBABILITIES; DYNAMIC BAYESIAN NETWORKS; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33646033713     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Arroyo, I., and Woolf, B. 2004. Inferring unobservable learning variables from students' help seeking behavior. Analyzing Student-Tutor Interaction Logs to Improve Educational Outcomes: Workshop Proceedings of ITS-2004.
2. Beal, C.; Arroyo, I.; Royer, J.; and Woolf, B. 2003. Wayang outpost: An intelligent multimedia tutor for high stakes math achievement tests. American Educational Research Association annual meeting.
3. Beck, J., and Woolf, B. 2000a. Reasoning from data rather than theory. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symposium.
4. Beck, J., and Woolf, B. 2000b. High-level Student Modeling with Machine Learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 5: 584-593.
5. Beck, J.; Woolf, B.; and Beal, C. 2000. ADVISOR: A machine learning architecture for intelligent tutor construction. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 17: 552-557.
6. Conati, C.; Gertner, A.; and VanLehn, K. 2002. Using bayesian networks to manage uncertainty in student modeling. Journal of User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12(4): 371-417.
7. Dean, T., and Kanazawa, K. 1989. A model for reasoning about persistence and causation. International Journal of Computational Intelligence, 5(3): 142-150.
8. Dempster, A.; Laird, N.; and Rubin, D. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algo rithm. Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series B, 39: 1-38.
9. Fisher, D. 1996. State models of skill acquisition: Optimizing the training of older adults. Aging and skilled performance: Advances in theory and applications: 17-44.
10. Heiner, C.; Beck, J.; and Mostow, J. 2004. Lessons on using its data to answer educational research questions. Analyzing Student-Tutor Interaction Logs to Improve Educational Outcomes: Workshop Proceedings of ITS-2004.
11. Koedinger, K., and Mathan, S. 2004. Distinguishing qualitatively different kinds of learning using log files and learning curves. Analyzing Student-Tutor Interaction Logs to Improve Educational Outcomes: Workshop Proceedings of ITS-2004.
12. Mayo, M., and Mitrovic, A. 2001. Optimising its behaviour with bayesian networks and decision theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12: 124-153.
13. Murray, R., and VanLehn, K. 2000. DT Tutor: A decision-theoretic, dynamic approach for optimal selection of tutorial actions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 5: 153-162.
14. Reye, J. 1998. Two-phase updating of student models based on dynamic belief networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 4: 274-283.