Predictors of change in participation rates following acquired brain injury: Results of a longitudinal study

Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 339-346

  Anaby, Dana ^a   Law, Mary ^b   Hanna, Steven ^b   Dematteo, Carol ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACQUIRED BRAIN INJURY; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; DEMOGRAPHY; FAMILY FUNCTIONING; FAMILY SIZE; FEMALE; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HOUSEHOLD INCOME; HUMAN; INFANT; INJURY SEVERITY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECREATION; SCHOOL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL COMPETENCE; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; BRAIN INJURY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FAMILY; LENGTH OF STAY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN INJURIES; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FAMILY; FEMALE; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RECREATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCHOOLS; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION;

EID: 84855888154     PISSN: 00121622     EISSN: 14698749     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04204.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva:WHO, 2001.
2. Larson RW. Toward a psychology of positive youth development. Am Psychol 2000; 55: 170-83.
3. Desha LN, Ziviani JM. Use of time in childhood and adolescence: a literature review on the nature of activity participation and depression. Aust Occup Ther J 2007; 54: 4-10.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010) Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths, 2002-2006. http:// www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/tbi_ed.html (accessed 21 November 2011).
5. Law M, Anaby D, DeMatteo C, Hanna S. Participation patterns of children with acquired brain injury. Brain Inj 2011; 25: 587-95.
6. Bedell GM, Dumas HM. Social participation of children and youth with acquired brain injuries discharged from inpatient rehabilitation: a follow-up study. Brain Inj 2004; 18: 65-82.
7. Galvin J, Froude EH, McAleer J. Children’s participation in home, school and community life after acquired brain injury. Aust Occup Ther J 2010; 57: 118-26.
8. Johnson AR, DeMatt E, Salorio CF. Predictors of outcome following acquired brain injury in children. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2009; 15: 124-32.
9. McKinlay A, Dalrymple-Alford JC, Horwood LJ, Fergusson DM. Long term psychosocial outcomes after mild head injury in early childhood. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 73: 281-8.
10. Muscara F, Catroppa C, Eren S, Anderson V. The impact of injury severity on long-term social outcome following paediatric traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2009; 19: 541-61.
11. Forsyth RJ, Salorio CF, Christensen JR. Modelling early recovery patterns after paediatric traumatic brain injury. Arch Dis Child 2010; 95: 266-70.
12. Galvin J, Lim BC, Steer K, Edwards J, Lee KJ. Predictors of functional ability of Australian children with acquired brain injury following inpatient rehabilitation. Brain Inj 2010; 24: 1008-16.
13. King G, McDougall J, DeWit D, Petrenchik T, Hurley P, Law M. Predictors of change over time in the activity participation of children and youth with physical disabilities. Child Health Care 2009; 38: 321-51.
14. King G, Law M, King S, Rosenbaum P, Kertoy MK, Young NL. A conceptual model of the factors affecting the recreation and leisure participation of children with disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2003; 23: 63-90.
15. King G, Law M, Hanna S, et al. Predictors of the leisure and recreation participation of children with physical disabilities: a structural equation modeling analysis. Child Health Care 2006; 35: 209-34.
16. Bedell GM. Functional outcomes of school-age children with acquired brain injuries at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Brain Inj 2008; 22: 313-24.
17. King G, Law M, Hurley P, Petrenchik T, Schwellnus H. A developmental comparison of the out-of-school recreation and leisure activity participation of boys and girls with and without physical disabilities. Int J Disabil Dev Edu 2010; 57: 77-107.
18. Jarus T, Anaby D, Bart O, Engel-Yeger B, Law M. Childhood participation in after-school activities: what is to be expected? Br J Occup Ther 2010; 73: 344-50.
19. Taylor HG, Yeates KO, Wade SL, Drotar D, Stancin T, Burant C. Bidirectional child-family influences on outcomes of traumatic brain injury in children. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2001; 7: 755-67.
20. King G, Petrenchik T, Law M, Hurley P. The enjoyment of formal and informal recreation and leisure activities: a comparison of school-aged children with and without physical disabilities. Int J Disabil Dev Edu 2009; 56: 109-30.
21. Byles J, Byrne C, Boyle MH, Offord DR. Ontario Child Health Study: reliability and validity of the general functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. Fam Process 1988; 27: 97-104.
22. Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS. The McMaster Family Assessment Device. J Marital Fam Ther 1983; 9: 171-80.
23. Chapman SB, Nasits J, Challas JD, Billinger AP. Long-term recovery in paediatric head injury: overcoming the hurdles. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 1999; 1: 19-30.
24. Sternbach GL. The Glasgow coma scale. J Emerg Med 2000; 19: 67-71.
25. Statistics Canada. (2006) Census Tables Income and Earnings. http://www12.statcan.ca.libaccess.lib.mcmaster.ca/census-recensement/2006/dp-pd/hlt/index-eng.cfm (accessed 6 April 2011).
26. King G, Law M, King S, et al. Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment, 2004.
27. King GA, Law M, King S, et al. Measuring children’s participation in recreation and leisure activities: construct validation of the CAPE and PAC. Child Care Health Dev 2007; 33: 28-39.
28. Imms C. Review of the Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment and the Preferences for Activity of Children. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2008; 28: 389-404.
29. Miller IW, Bishop DS, Epstein NB, Keitner GI. The McMaster Family Assessment Device-reliability and validity. J Marital Fam Ther 1985; 11: 345-56.
30. Singer JD, Willett JB. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
31. Peugh JL, Enders CK. Using the SPSS mixed procedure to fit cross-sectional and longitudinal multilevel models. Edu Psychol Measure 2005; 65: 717-41.
32. Dumas HM, Bedell GM, Shannon Hamill M. Strategies to promote activity and participation in children and youths with acquired brain injuries. Int J Rehabil Res 2003; 26: 303-8.
33. Lieh-Lai MW, Theodorou AA, Sarnaik AP, Meert KL, Moylan PM, Canady AI. Limitations of the Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting outcome in children with traumatic brain injury. J Pediatr 1992; 120: 195-9.
34. Bedell GM, Cohn ES, Dumas HM. Exploring parents’ use of strategies to promote social participation of school-age children with acquired brain injuries. Am J Occup Ther 2005; 59: 273-84.
35. Medrich EA. The Serious Business of Growing Up: A Study of Children’s Lives Outside School. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.
36. Feldman AF, Matjasko JL. The role of school-based extracurricular activities in adolescent development: a comprehensive review and future directions. Rev Edu Res 2005; 75: 159-210.
37. DeMatteo CA, Cousins MA, Lin CY, Law MC, Colantonio A, Macarthur C. Exploring postinjury living environments for children and youth with acquired brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 1803-10.