Using the SPSS MIXED procedure to fit cross-sectional and longitudinal multilevel models

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 65, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 811-835

  Peugh, James L ^a   Enders, Craig K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Hierarchical linear modeling; Longitudinal analysis; Multilevel modeling; Software application; SPSS

Indexed keywords

EID: 27144512096     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013164405278558     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Csaki (Eds.), Second international symposium on information theory (pp. 267-288). Budapest, Hungary: Akademiai Kiado.
2. Farmer, G. L. (2000). Use of multilevel covariance structure analysis to evaluate the multilevel nature of theoretical constructs. Social Work Research, 24, 180-191.
3. Ferron, J. ( 1997). Moving between hierarchical model notations. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 119-123.
4. Ferron, J., Dailey, R., & Yi, Q. (2002). Effects of misspecifying the first-level error structure in two-level models of change. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 379-403.
5. Goldstein, H., Healy, M. J. R., & Rasbash, J. (1994). Multilevel time series models with applications to repeated measures data. Statistics in Medicine, 13, 1643-1655.
6. Hox, J. J., & Kreft, I. G. G. (Eds.). (1994). Multilevel analysis methods [Special issue]. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(3).
7. Kreft, I. G. G. (Ed.). (1995). Hierarchical linear models: Problems and prospects [Special issue]. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20(2).
8. Kreft, I. G. G., de Leew, J., & Aiken, L. S. (1995). The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 1-21.
9. Kreft, I. G. G., de Leew, J., & van der Leeden, R. (1994). Review of five multilevel analysis programs: BMDP-5V, GENMOD, HLM, ML3, VARCL. American Statistician, 48, 324-335.
10. Lesaffre, E., Todem, D., Verbeke, G., & Kenward, M. (2000). Flexible modeling of the covariance matrix in a linear random effects model. Biometrical Journal, 42, 807-822.
11. O'Connor, B. P. (1999). Simple and flexible SAS and SPSS programs for analyzing lag-sequential categorical data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 31, 718-726.
12. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
14. Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 323-355.
15. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Van Leeuwen, D. M. (1997). A note on the covariance structure in a linear model. American Statistician, 51, 140-144.
17. Willett, J. B. (1988). Questions and answers in the measurement of change. InE. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education (1988-1989). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
18. Wolfinger, R. D. (1993). Covariance structure selection in general mixed models. Communications in Statistics-Simulations, 22, 1079-1106.
19. Zhou, X. H., Perkins, A. J., & Hui, S. L. (1999). Comparisons of software packages for generalized linear multilevel models. American Statistician, 53, 282-290.