Long-term recovery in paediatric head injury: Overcoming the hurdles

International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 19-30

  Chapman, Sandra Bond ^a   Nasits, Jennifer ^a   Challas, Jocelyn Deering ^a   Billinger, Alicia Paige ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003204496     PISSN: 17549515     EISSN: 17549507     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14417049909167150     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Biddle, K. R., McCabe, A., & Bliss, L. S. (1996). Narrative skills following traumatic brain injurv in children and adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29(6) 447-470.
2. Chapman, S. B. (1995). Discourse as an outcome measure in pediatric head-injured populations. In S. H. Broman & M. E. Michel (Eds.), Traumatic brain injur}/ in children (pp. 95-116). New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Chapman, S. B. (1997). Cognitive-communication abilities in children with closed head injury. American jourmil of Speech-Language Pathology, 6(2), 50-58.
4. Chapman, S. B., Culhane, K. A., Levin, H. S., Harward, H., Mendelsohn, D., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Fletcher, J. M., & Bruce, D. (1992). Narrative discourse after closed head injury in children and adolescents. Brain and Language, 43, 42-65.
5. Chapman, S. B., Levin, H. S., & Harward, H. (1996). Longterm recovery of discourse, cognitive, and psychological abilities in pediatric head injurv: A case illustration. Poland Conference and Proceedings Publication.
6. Chapman, S. B., Levin, H. S., & Lawyer, S. L. (in press). Communication problems resulting from brain injury in children: Special issues of assessment and management. In S. McDonald, L. Togher, & C. Code (Eds.), Communication skills following traumatic brain injuny. Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
7. Chapman, S. B., Levin, H. S., Matejka, J., Harward, H. N., & Kufera, J. (1995). Discourse ability in head injured children: Considerations of linguistic, psychosocial, and cognitive factors, journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 10, 36-54.
8. Chapman, S. B., Levin, H. S., Wanek, A., Weyrauch, J., & Kufera, J. (1995). Discourse after closed head injury in young children. Brain and Language, 61, 420-449.
9. Chapman, S. B., Watkins, R., Custafson, C, Moore, S., Levin, H. S., & Kufera, J. A. (1997). Narrative discourse in children with closed head injury, children with language impairment, and typically developing children. American journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 6(2), 66-76. (Pubitemid 127081489)
10. Dennis, M., & Barnes, M. A. (1990). Knowing meaning, getting the point, bridging the gap, and carrying the message: Aspects of discourse following closed head injury in childhood and adolescence. Brain and Language, 39(3), 428-446.
11. Frederikson, C. H., Bracewell, F. J., Breuleux, A., & Renuas, A. (1990). The cognitive representation and processing of discourse: Function and dysfunction. In Y. Joanette & H. H. Brownell (Eds.), Discourse ability and brain damage: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 69-112). New York: Springer-Verlag.
12. Hill, M. (1991). Writing summaries promotes thinking and learning across the curriculum - but why are thev so difficult to write? Journal of Reading, 34(7), 536-539.
13. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990. (1990). Pub. L. No. 101-176.
14. Jaffe, K. M., Brink, J. D., Hays, R.M., & Choraze, A. J. L. (1990). Specific problems associated with pediatric head injury. In M. Rosenthal, E. R. Griffith, M.R. Bond, M. D. Miller (Eds.), Rehabilitation of the adult and child with traumatic brain injury (pp. 539-557). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.
15. Kay, D. S., & Black, J. S. (1986). Explanation-driven processing in summarisation: The interaction of content and process. In J. A . Galambos, R. P. Abelson, & J. B. Black (Eds.), Knowledge structure (pp. 211-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Kinnunen, R., & Vauras, M. (1995). Comprehension monitoring and the level of comprehension in high-and lowachieving primary school children's reading. Learning and Instruction, 5,143-165.
17. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Reviczv, 85, 363-394.
18. Klonoff, H., Low, M. D., & Clark, C. (1977). Head injuries in children: a prospective five year follow-up. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 40,1211-1219. (Pubitemid 8260775)
19. Levin, H. S.,Culhane, K. A', Mendelsohn, D., Lilly, M. A., Bruce, D., Fletcher, J. M., Chapman, S. B., Harward, H., & Eisenberg, H. M. (1993). Cognition in relation to magnetic resonance imaging in head-injured children and adolescents. Archives of Neurology, 50, 897-905. (Pubitemid 23275117)
20. Levin, H. S., & Eisenberg, H.M . (1979). Neuropsychological impairment after closed head injury in children and adolescents, Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 4, 389-402. (Pubitemid 10133071)
21. Stein, B. L., & Kirby, J. R. (1992). The effects of text absent and text present conditions on summarisation and recall of text, Journal of Reading Behaviour, 24(2), 217-232.
22. Thistlethwaite, L. L. (1991). Summarising: It's more than just finding the main idea. Intervention in School and Clinic, 27(1), 25-30.
23. Ulatowska, H. K., & Chapman, S. B. (1994). Discourse macrostructure in aphasia. In R. Bloom, L. K. Obler, S. DeSanti, & J. Ehrlich (Eds.), Discourse analysis and applications (pp. 29-46). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. van Dijk, T. A. (1995). On macrostructure, mental models, and other inventions: A brief personal history of the Kintsch-van Dijk theory. In C. A. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C. R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension (pp. 383-410). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Ylvisaker, M. (1993). Communication outcome in children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 3, 367-387. (Pubitemid 24013407)
26. Ylvisaker, M. (1998). Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: Children and adolescents (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.