Rising to the challenge: A study of patient and public involvement in four primary care trusts

Primary Health Care Research and Development

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 125-134

  South, Jane ^a  

^a LEEDS METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

communities; organizational development; patient and public involvement; primary care trusts

Indexed keywords

EID: 21644456779     PISSN: 14634236     EISSN: 14771128     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/1463423604pc184oa     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alborz, A., Wilkin, D. and Smith, K. 2002: Are primary care groups and trusts consulting local communities? Health and Social Care in the Community 10(1), 20–27.
2. Anderson, W. 2001: Primary care groups: corporate opportunities for public involvement. In Gillam, S. and Brooks, F., editors, New beginnings. Towards patient and public involvement in primary health care. London: Kings Fund, 2SM-3.
3. Brooks, F. 2001: Why user involvement in primary health care? In Gillam, S. and Brooks, F., editors, New beginnings. Towards patient and public involvement in primary health care. London: Kings Fund, 1–15.
4. Brown, I. 1994: The organization of participation in general practice. In Heritage, Z., editor, Community participation in primary care. The Royal College of General Practitioners, Occasional Paper, No. 64, 1–4.
5. Brown, I. 1999: Patient participation groups in general practice in the National Health Service. Health Expectations 2, 169–178.
6. Brown, I. 2000: Involving the public in general practice in an urban district: levels and type of activity and perceptions of obstacles. Health and Social Care in the Community 8(4), 251–259.
7. Brown, I. 2001: Organizational values in general practice and public involvement: case studies in an urban district. Health and Social Care in the Community 9(3), 159–167.
8. Crisp, B., Swerissen, H. and Duckett, S. 2000: Four approaches to capacity building in health: consequences for measurement and accountability. Health Promotion International 15(2), 99–107.
9. Crowley, P. 2000: Delivering health in the new NHS. The role of the public. A discussion paper. Newcastle: Newcastle Community Action on Health.
10. Department of Health. 2001a: Shifting the balance of power within the NHS. Securing delivery. London: Department of Health.
11. Department of Health. 2001b: Involving patients and the public in healthcare. A discussion document. London: Department of Health. Fisher, BT. and Gillam, S. 1999: Community development in the new NHS. British Journal of General Practice 49, 428–430.
12. Florin D. and Anderson, N. 2000: Public involvement: whose priority and whose responsibility. British Journal of Health Care Management 6(6), 258–261.
13. Godinho, J., Rathwell, T., Gott, M., Giraldes, M.R. and Daley, J. 1992: Tipping the balance towards primary health care: understanding and investigating the agenda for change. European Journal of Public Health 2, 134-142.
14. Heritage, Z. editors, 1994: Community participation in primary care. London: The Royal College of General Practitioners, Occasional Paper, No. 64.
15. Judge, K., Barnes, M., Bauld, L., Benzal, M., Killoran, A., Robinson, R., Wigglesworth, R. and Zeilig, H. 1999: Health action zones: learning to make a difference. Findings from a preliminary review of health action zones and proposals for a national evaluation. Report submitted to the Department of Health, June 1999. http://www.kent.ac.uk/pssru/resHAZ.html (last accessed 9 September 2003).
16. Milewa, T. and Harrison, S. 2001: Group dynamics. Health Service Journal. 26 April 2001, 32–33.
17. McIver S. 1999: Public involvement in primary care: implications for primary care groups. NT Research 4(4), 245–256.
18. McFadyen, J. and Farrington, A. 1997: User and carer participation in the NHS. British Journal of Health Care Management 3(5), 260–264.
19. NHS Executive. 1999: Patient and public involvement in the new NHS. HSC 1999/210. London: NHS Executive.
20. North, N., Lupton, C., Khan, P. 1999: Going with the grain? General practitioners and the new NHS. Health and Social Care in the Community 7(6), 408–416.
21. North N. and Peckham S. 2001: Analysing structural interests in primary care groups. Social Policy and Administration 35(4), 426-440.
22. O’Keefe, E. and Hogg, C. 1999: Public participation and marginalized groups: the community development model. Health Expectations 2, 245–254.
23. Peckham, S. 2000: Primary care groups: a new opportunity for collaboration and participation? Research, Policy and Planning 18(1), 12–20.
24. Pickin, C., Popay J., Staley, K., Bruce, N., Jones C., Gowman, N. 2002: Developing a model to enhance the capacity of statutory organizations to engage with lay communities. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 7(1), 34–39.
25. Riley, J. 1990: Getting the most from your data. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services.
26. Rowe, R. and Shepherd, M. 2002: Public participation in the new NHS: no closer to citizen control? Social Policy and Administration 36(3), 275–290.
27. Scottish Association of Health Councils, Scottish Consumer Council, The Scottish Office: Department of Health 1999: Designed to involve: public involvement in the new primary care structures. Glasgow: Scottish Consumer Council.
28. Scottish Consumer Council. 1998: Putting partnership into practice: involving the public in primary care. Glasgow: Scottish Consumer Council. Secretary of State for Health. 1997: The New NHS. Modern, dependable. London: The Stationary Office.
29. Secretary of State for Health. 2000: The NHS Plan. A plan for investment. A plan for reform. London: The Stationary Office, Cm 48184.
30. Shepherd, M. 2001: Voice recognition. Health Service Journal. 15th February 2001, 32–33.
31. Smith, J., Regen, E., Goodwin, N., Mcleod, H. and Shapiro, J. 2000a: Getting into their stride: interim report of a national evaluation of primary care groups. Birmingham: The University of Birmingham, Health Services Management Centre.
32. Smith, J., Regen, E., Shapiro, J. and Baines, D. 2000b: National evaluation of general practitioner commissioning pilots: lessons for primary care groups. British Journal of General Practice 50, 269–272.
33. Smithies, J. and Webster, G. 1998: Community involvement in health. from passive recipients to active participants. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
34. Social Exclusion Unit. 2001: A new commitment to neighbourhood renewal: National Strategy Action Plan. London: Cabinet Office. South, J. and Green, E. 2001: Learning from practice: evaluating a community involvement team within a Health Action Zone. Research, Policy and Planning 119(3), 1–9.
35. South, J. and Green, E. 2002: Building community involvement in primary care trusts - an evaluation of a HAZ community involvement team in Bradford. In Bauld, L. and Judge, K., editors, Learning from health action zones. Chichester: Aeneas Press, 39-48.
36. Wilcox, D. 1994: The guide to effective participation. Brighton: Partnership Books.
37. Wilkin, D., Gillam, S. and Leese, B. editors, 2000: National tracker survey of primary care groups and trusts. Progress and challenges 1999/2000. Manchester: University of Manchester: Kings Fund.
38. World Health Organization. 1978: Alma-Ata: primary health care. Geneva: World Health Organization.
39. Wykurz, G. 2000: Public involvement project. Wandsworth CHC supported by the Kings Fund. Evaluation Report on the first year 1999/2000. June 2000. London: Centre for Community Care and Primary Health Care, University of Westminster.