How can users be involved in service improvement in health and social care, and why is this important?

Journal of Integrated Care Pathways

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 49-58

  Challans, Emma ^a  

^a Sheffield South West PCT ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; DECISION MAKING; DYSPNEA; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIVACY; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; SOCIAL CARE; TEACHING;

EID: 33750907100     PISSN: 14732297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/205343540601000202     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Crawford M, Rutter D, Manley C et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of heath care. BMJ 2002;325:12 63
2. Cayton H. Patient and Public Involvement in Health. The Evidence for Policy Implementation. A Summary of the Results of the Health in Partnership Research Programme. London: Department of Health, 2004
3. Clinical Audit Patient Panel. Sheffield South West Primary Care Trust, 2004-2006
4. Department of Health. NHS Plan. A Plan for Investment. A Plan for Reform. London: HMSO, 2000
5. Hope T. Evidence-based Patient Choice. Promoting Patient Choice. London: King Fund Publishing, 1997
6. Crisp N. National Primary and Care Trust Development Programme (Natpact). Creating a Patient-led NHS Delivering the NHS IMPROVEMENT Plan. London: HMSO, 2005
7. McIver S. An Introduction to Quality in Health Care. Service Users Views of Quality - an overview 2004. Birmingham: Health Services Management Centre, 2004
8. Grol R. Improving the quality of medical care. JAMA 2001;286:2578-85
9. Chambers R, Drinkwater C, Boath E. Involving Patients and the Public. How to it Better. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 2003
10. Carr S. Has service user participation made a difference to social care services? Social Care Institute for Excellence. Better Knowledge for better practice. Position Paper No 3. 2004
11. Best Value. A Guide to User Involvement Good Practice in Best Value Reviews. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2002
12. Beverley C, Nicolson P, Booth A, et al. Eliciting Users' Views of the processes of Health Care. A Scoping Study. The School of Health and Related Research and Consumer Health Psychology at ScHARR. Sheffield: The University of Sheffield, 2002
13. Department of Health. Working for Patients. London: HMSO, 1989
14. Department of Health. The Patients Charter. London: HMSO, 1991
15. Local Voices. Listening to local voices. Research Paper, Number 9. National Association of Health Authorities and Trusts, 1992
16. Kennedy Report. Learning from Bristol. London: HMSO, 2002
17. Simpson E, House A. Involving users in the delivery and evaluation of mental health services: systematic review. BMJ 2002;325:1265
18. NHS Modernisation Agency. Involving Patients and Carers. General Improvement Skills. London: Department of Health, 2005
19. Honigsbaum F, Richard J, Lockett T, Ham C. Priority Setting in Action. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1995
20. Stately K. Voices, Values and Health, Involving the Public in Moral Issues. London: Kings Fund, 2001
21. Department of Health. Section 11 of the Health and Social Care Act. 2001. Strengthening Accountability. Involving Patients and the Public. Policy Guidance. London: Department of Health, 2003
22. Mullen P. Priority Setting and the Public. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 2002
23. Moullin M. Delivering Excellence in Health and Social Care, Buckingham: Open University Press, 2002
24. Gilbert D. Nothing about us without us. London: Commission for Health Improvement, 2003
25. Ashmore S. Learning from Clinical Governance Reviews Carried out by Commission for Health Improvement - Guidance for PCTs. Leicestershire Primary Care Audit Group, 2004
26. Fletcher G, Bradburn J. Voices in Action Resource Book. London: Department of Health, 2001
27. The Royal College of Radiologists. The Clinical Audit Cycle. London: RCR, 1996
28. Farrell C. Patient and Public Involvement in Health. The Evidence for Policy Implementation. A Summary of the Results of the Health in Partnership Research Programme. London: Department of Health, 2004
29. Sheaff R, O'Grady T. Consumer Relations, Marketing and Quality in the NHS. Some Lessons from the Approaches of other Organisations, 1989. Manchester: Health Service Management Unit, University of Manchester, 1997
30. Jones IR, Doyle L, Berney L, Kelly M. Making Decisions about Treatment Priorities. Decision Making in Primary Care: Patients as Partners in Resource Allocation (PIER Project). London: Department of Health, 2003
31. Scottish Executive. Cancer Service Improvement Programme. Final Report. Scottish Executive, 2006
32. Millburn A. RCN Congress. London: Royal College of Nursing, 2003
33. Coulter A. Engaging Patients in their Healthcare. How is the UK doing Relative to Other Countries? Oxford: Picker institute, 2006