Effect of optic disc size and disease severity on the diagnostic capability of glaucoma imaging technologies in an indian population

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 475-480

  Garudadri, Chandra S ^a   Rao, Harsha L ^a   Parikh, Rajul S ^a,b   Jonnadula, Ganesh B ^a   Selvaraj, Prabhakaran ^a   Nutheti, Rishita ^a   Thomas, Ravi ^a,c,d  

^a L V PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE   (India)

^b Bombay City Eye Institute & Research Centre   (India)

^c QUEENSLAND EYE INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

GDx VCC; glaucoma imaging devices; HRT; stratus OCT

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFOCAL SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INDIAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC DISK SIZE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; SCANNING LASER POLARIMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INDIA; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; SCANNING LASER POLARIMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84865966219     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: 1536481X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31821829f1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. American Academy of Ophthalmology Glaucoma Panel. Preferred Practice Pattern. Primary Open-angle Glaucoma. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2003.
2. Mansour AM. Racial variation of optic disc size. Ophthalmic Res. 1991;23:67-72.
3. Chi T, Ritch R, Stickler D, et al. Racial differences in optic nerve head parameters. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107: 836-839.
4. Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Berry CC, et al. Racial differences in optic disc topography: baseline results from the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy ancillary study to the ocular hypertension treatment study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122: 22-28.
5. Healey PR, Mitchell P, Smith W, et al. Relationship between cup-disc ratio and optic disc diameter: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Aust N Z Ophthalmol. 1997;25(Suppl 1):S99-101.
6. Mardin CY, Horn FK. Influence of optic disc size on the sensitivity of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1998;236:641-645.
7. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Drance SM. The effect of optic disc size on diagnostic precision with the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:545-548.
8. Quigley HA, Coleman AL, Dorman-Pease ME. Larger optic nerve heads have more nerve fibers in normal monkey eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:1441-1443.
9. Jonas JB, Schmidt AM, Mü ller-Bergh JA, et al. Human optic nerve fiber count and optic disc size. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:2012-2018.
10. Varma R, Skaf M, Barron E. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal human eyes. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:2114-2119.
11. Mikelberg FS, Yidegiligne HM, White VA, et al. Relation between optic nerve axon number and axon diameter to scleral canal area. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:60-63.
12. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Influence of Disease Severity and Optic Disc Size on the Diagnostic Performance of Imaging Instruments in Glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1008-1015.
13. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The Lens Opacities Classification System III: the Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:831-836.
14. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated Static Perimetry
15. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254:1178-1181.
16. Weinreb RN, Shakiba S, Zangwill L. Scanning laser polarimetry to measure the nerve fiber layer of normal and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;119: 627-636.
17. Zhou Q, Weinreb RN. Individualized compensation of anterior segment birefringence during scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:2221-2228.
18. Weinreb RN. Laser scanning tomography to diagnose and monitor glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1993;4:3-6.
19. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1557-1563.
20. Miglior S, Guareschi M, Albe E, et al. Detection of glaucomatous visual field changes using the Moorfields regression analysis of the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:26-33.
21. Budenz DL, Michael A, Chang RT, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the Stratus OCT for perimetric glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:3-9.
22. Badalà F, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Raoof DA, et al. Optic disk and nerve fiber layer imaging to detect glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:724-732.
23. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:827-837.
24. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, et al. Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine. 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown; 1991:67-152.
25. Leisenring W, Pepe MS, Longton G. A marginal regression modelling framework for evaluating medical diagnostic tests. Stat Med. 1997;16:1263-1281.
26. Martus P, Stroux A, Junemann AM, et al. GEE approaches to marginal regression models for medical diagnostic tests. Stat Med. 2004;23:1377-1398.
27. Agarwal HC, Gulati V, Sihota R. The normal optic nerve head on Heidelberg retina tomograph II. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2003;51:25-33.
28. Nangia V, Matin A, Bhojwani K, et al. Optic disc size in a population-based study in central India: the Central India Eye andMedical Study (CIEMS). Acta Ophthalmol. 2008;86:103-104.
29. Thomas R, George R, Muliyil J, et al. Correlation of confocal laser scanning tomography with planimetric photographic measurements of the optic disc in a normal South Indian population: the Vellore Eye Study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2005;53:289-294.
30. The AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study 14: distinguishing progression of glaucoma from visual field fluctuations. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2109-2116.