Individual rights, judicial deference, and administrative law norms in constitutional decision making

Boston University Law Review

Volumn 91, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 2029-2102

  Berger, Eric ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855769732     PISSN: 00068047     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (133)

1. Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 320 (1978)
2. Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 323 (2003).
3. Clay v. Tex. Women's Univ., 728 F.2d 714, 716
4. Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244, 270-76 (2003)
5. ALEXANDER BICKEL, THE LEAST DANGEROUS BRANCH: THE SUPREME COURT AT THE BAR OF POLITICS 16-23 (1962).
6. PETER L. STRAUSS ET AL., GELLHORN AND BYSE'S ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: CASES AND COMMENTS 9 (rev. 10th ed. 2003)
7. KENNETH CULP DAVIS, DISCRETIONARY JUSTICE: A PRELIMINARY INQUIRY 4 (1969).
8. Daniel P. Tokaji, First Amendment Equal Protection: On Discretion, Inequality, and Participation, 101 MICH. L. REV. 2409, 2409-10 (2003)
9. Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428, 437 (2000)
10. Hampton v. Mow Sun Wong, 426 U.S. 88, 98-99 (1976)
11. Eve Brensike Primus, A Structural Vision of Habeas Corpus, 98 CALIF. L. REV. 1, 3-5 (2010)
12. Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz, The Subjects of the Constitution, 62 STAN. L. REV. 1209, 1210 (2010)
13. Lopez v. United States, 514 U.S. 549, 564 (1995)
14. Lawrence G. Sager, Fair Measure: The Legal Status of Underenforced Constitutional Norms, 91 HARV. L. REV. 1212, 1214-17 (1978)
15. Lisa Schultz Bressman, Beyond Accountability: Arbitrariness and Legitimacy in the Administrative State, 78 N.Y.U. L. REV. 461, 527-33 (2003)
16. PETER L. STRAUSS, ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE IN THE UNITED STATES 148 (2d ed. 2002)
17. Mont. Chapter of Ass'n of Civilian Technicians, Inc. v. Young, 514 F.2d 1165, 1167
18. Richard B. Stewart, The Reformation of American Administrative Law, 88 HARV. L. REV. 1667,1676-88 (1975).
19. Matthew D. Adler, Judicial Restraint in the Administrative State: Beyond the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, 145 U. PA. L. REV. 759, 765-66 (1997)
20. Gillian E. Metzger, Administrative Law as the New Federalism, 57 DUKE L.J. 2023, 2047-71 (2008)
21. Edward L. Rubin, Law and Legislation in the Administrative State, 89 COLUM. L. REV. 369, 409 (1989)
22. CHARLES L. BLACK, JR., STRUCTURE AND RELATIONSHIP IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 89 (1969)
23. Henry P. Monaghan, First Amendment "Due Process," 83 HARV. L. REV. 518, 522 (1970)
24. J. Harvie Wilkinson III, Our Structural Constitution, 104 COLUM. L. REV. 1687, 1706 (2004)
25. WILLIAM N. ESKRIDGE JR. & JOHN FEREJOHN, A REPUBLIC OF STATUTES: THE NEW AMERICAN CONSTITUTION 29-74 (2010)
26. Eric Berger, Lethal Injection and the Problem of Constitutional Remedies, 27 YALE L. & POL'Y REV. 259, 302-03 (2009)
27. Deborah W. Denno, When Legislatures Delegate Death: The Troubling Paradox Behind State Uses of Electrocution and Lethal Injection and What It Says About Us, 63 OHIO ST. L.J. 63, 116-25 (2002)
28. Morales v. Tilton, 465 F. Supp. 2d 972, 980 (N.D. Cal. 2006)
29. Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407, 446-47 (2008)
30. Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 578 (2005)
31. Richard H. Fallon, Jr., Strict Judicial Scrutiny, 54 UCLA L. REV. 1267, 1323 & n.313 (2007).
32. Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244,270-76 (2003).
33. Lani Guinier, Admissions Rituals as Political Acts: Guardians at the Gates of Our Democratic Ideals, 117 HARV. L. REV. 113,143 (2003).
34. Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 309 (1978).
35. PETER H. IRONS, JUSTICE AT WAR 38,48 (1983).
36. Munaf v. Geren, 553 U.S. 674, 702 (2008)
37. Patrick O. Gudridge, Remembering Endo?, 116 HARV. L. REV. 1933, 1939 (2003)
38. Ashwander v. Tenn. Valley Auth., 297 U.S. 288, 348 (1936)
39. Wilson v. Seiter, 501 U.S. 294, 302-06 (1991)
40. Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 351-52 (1981)
41. Margo Schlanger, Civil Rights Injunctions over Time: A Case Study of Jail and Prison Court Orders, 81 N.Y.U. L. REV. 550, 622 (2006)
42. Giovanna Shay, Ad Law Incarcerated, 14 BERKELEY J. CRIM. L. 329, 339 (2009)
43. MALCOLM M. FEELEY & EDWARD L. RUBIN, JUDICIAL POLICY MAKING AND THE MODERN STATE: HOW THE COURTS REFORMED AMERICA'S PRISONS 46-47 (1998)
44. JOHN J. GIBBONS & NICHOLAS DE B. KATZENBACH, VERA INST, OF JUSTICE, CONFRONTING CONFINEMENT: A REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON SAFETY AND ABUSE IN AMERICA'S PRISONS 77-78 (2006), available at http://www.prisoncornmission.org/ pdfs/Confronting-Confinement.pdf
45. Cass R. Sunstein, Foreword: Leaving Things Undecided, 110 HARV. L. REV. 4, (1996)
46. Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67, 81-84 (1976
47. Lawrence Gene Sager, Insular Majorities Unabated: Warth v. Seldin and City of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc., 91 HARV. L. REV. 1373, 1417 (1978)
48. WILLIAM N. ESKRIDGE, JR. ET AL., CASES AND MATERIALS ON LEGISLATION: STATUTES AND THE CREATION OF PUBLIC POLICY 425-26 (4th ed. 2007).
49. FREDERICK SCHAUER, FREE SPEECH: A PHILOSOPHICAL ENQUIRY 7-8 (1982)
50. KATHLEEN M. SULLIVAN & GERALD GUNTHER, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 1118 (17th ed. 2010)
51. John L. Watts, To Tell the Truth: A Qui Tarn Action for Perjury in a Civil Proceeding Is Necessary to Protect the Integrity of the Civil Judicial System, 79 TEMP. L. REV. 773, 817 (2006)
52. Robert L. Rabin, Federal Regulation in Historical Perspective, 38 STAN. L. REV. 1189, 1300-26 (1986)
53. Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 334-35 (1976)
54. JERRY L. MASHAW, DUE PROCESS IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE 8-29 (1985)
55. Vt. Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 435 U.S. 519, 523-24 (1978)
56. Gillian E. Metzger, The Story of Vermont Yankee: A Cautionary Tale of Judicial Review and Nuclear Waste, in ADMINISTRATIVE LAW STORIES 125,160-67
57. Rachel E. Barkow, Separation of Powers and the Criminal Law, 58 STAN. L. REV. 989, 993 (2006)
58. Jon D. Michaels, The (Willingly) Fettered Executive: Presidential Spinoffs in National Security Domains and Beyond, 97 VA. L. REV. 801, 885-87 (2011)
59. Kathryn A. Watts, Proposing a Place for Politics in Arbitrary and Capricious Review, 119 YALE L.J. 2, 32-45 (2009)
60. HENRY FRIENDLY, THE FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES: THE NEED FOR BETTER DEFINITION OF STANDARDS 21-22 (1962)
61. Stuart Minor Benjamin & Ernest A. Young, Tennis with the Net Down: Administrative Federalism Without Congress, 57 DUKE L.J. 2111, 2129 (2008)
62. Jody Freeman, The Private Role in Public Governance, 75 N.Y.U. L. REV. 543, 545-46 (2000)
63. Sandra B. Zellmer, The Devil, the Details, and the Dawn of the 21st Century Administrative State: Beyond the New Deal, 32 ARIZ. ST. L.J. 941, 946-57 (2000)
64. David Horton, Arbitration as Delegation, 86 N.Y.U. L. REV. 437, 496 (2011).
65. Wyeth v. Levine, 129 S. Ct. 1187, 1201 (2009)
66. Cass R. Sunstein, Nondelegation Canons, 67 U. Cm. L. REV. 315, 315 (2000)
67. Ernest A. Young, Constitutional Avoidance, Resistance Norms, and the Preservation of Judicial Review, 78 TEX. L. REV. 1549, 1605-07 (2000)
68. Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 243, 270-75 (2006)
69. Rachel Barkow, Insulating Agencies: Avoiding Capture Through Institutional Design, 89 TEX. L. REV. 15,31-37 (2010)
70. Jack B. Weinstein, Compensation for Mass Private Delicts: Evolving Roles of Administrative, Criminal, and Tort Law, 2001 U. I I I . L. REV. 947, 977 n.127
71. David J. Barron & Elena Kagan, Chevron's Nondelegation Doctrine, 2001 SUP. CT. REV. 201, 201-02 (2001)
72. Elena Kagan, Presidential Administration, 114 HARV. L. REV. 2245, 2331-39 (2001)
73. Lawrence Lessig & Cass Sunstein, The President and the Administration, 94 COLUM. L. REV. 1, 2-3 (1994)
74. Peter M. Shane, Legislative Delegation, the Unitary Executive, and the Legitimacy of the Administrative State, 33 HARV. J.L. & PUB. POL'Y 103, 108 (2010)
75. Glen Staszewski, Reason-Giving and Accountability, 93 MINN. L. REV. 1253, 1271 (2009)
76. Evan J. Criddle, Fiduciary Administration: Rethinking Popular Representation in Agency Rulemaking, 88 TEX. L. REV. 441, 448 (2010)
77. Lisa Schultz Bressman, How Mead Has Muddled Judicial Review of Agency Action, 58 VAND. L. REV. 1443, 1449 (2005)
78. Amanda Leiter, Substance or Illusion? The Dangers of Imposing a Standing Threshold, 97 GEO. L.J. 391, 415 (2009)
79. Lisa Schultz Bressman, Procedures as Politics in Administrative Law, 107 COLUM. L. REV. 1749,1777,1780(2007).
80. Elizabeth Garrett, Accountability and Restraint: The Federal Budget Process and the Line Item Veto Act, 20 CARDOZO L. REV. 871, 924-25 (1999)
81. Jane S. Schacter, Ely and the Idea of Democracy, 57 STAN. L. REV. 737, 756 (2004)
82. Christopher R. Berry & Jacob E. Gersen, The Unbundled Executive, 75 U. CHI. L. REV. 1385, 1399-1400 (2008)
83. Daniel J. Solove, The Darkest Domain: Deference, Judicial Review, and the Bill of Rights, 84 IOWA L. REV. 941,1003-09 (1999).
84. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 597 (1993)
85. Louis KAPLOW & STEVEN SHAVELL, FAIRNESS VERSUS WELFARE 400-01 (2002)
86. Jerry Mashaw, Reasoned Administration: The European Union, the United States, and the Project of Democratic Governance, 76 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 99,117 (2007).
87. ALFRED C. AMAN, JR. & WILLIAM T. MAYTON, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 463 (1993)
88. R. George Wright, Arbitrariness: Why the Most Important Idea in Administrative Law Can't Be Defined, and What This Means for the Law in General, 44 U. RICH. L. REV. 839, 839 (2010)
89. RICHARD J. PIERCE, JR., ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PROCESS 327 (2009)
90. Mark Seidenfeld, A Civic Republican Justification for the Bureaucratic State, 105 HARV. L. REV. 1511, 1515 (1992)
91. STEPHEN G. BREYER ET AL., ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND REGULATORY POLICY: PROBLEMS, TEXT, AND CASES 494 (6th ed. 2006)
92. Raoul Berger, Administrative Arbitrariness and Judicial Review, 65 COLUM. L. REV. 55, 57 & n.11 (1965)
93. Raoul Berger, Administrative Arbitrariness and Judicial Review, 65 COLUM. L. REV. 55, 57 & n.11 (1965)
94. Todd S. Aagaard, Factual Premises of Statutory Interpretation in Agency Review Cases, 77 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 366, 402 (2009)
95. Mark Seidenfeld, Cognitive Loafing, Social Conformity, and Judicial Review of Agency Rulemaking, 87 CORNELL L. REV. 486, 508-22 (2002)
96. Glen Staszewski, Rejecting the Myth of Popular Sovereignty and Applying an Agency Model to Direct Democracy, 56 VAND. L. REV. 395,443 (2003)
97. Kevin M. Stack, The Constitutional Foundations of Chenery, 116 YALE L.J. 952, 958 (2007).
98. William N. Eskridge, Jr. & Lauren E. Baer, The Continuum of Deference: Supreme Court Treatment of Agency Statutory Interpretations from Chevron to Hamdan, 96 GEO. L.J. 1083, 1181 (2008)
99. Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1,12 (1967)
100. David Zaring, Reasonable Agencies, 96 VA. L. REV. 135, 137 (2010)
101. JEFFREY A. SEGAL & HAROLD J. SPAETH, THE SUPREME COURT AND THE ATTITUDINAL MODEL REVISITED 7-12 (2002)
102. Thomas J. Miles & Cass R. Sunstein, Do Judges Make Regulatory Policy? An Empirical Investigation of Chevron, 73 U. CHI. L. REV. 823, 825-26 (2006)
103. Connor N. Raso & William N. Eskridge, Jr., Chevron as Canon, Not a Precedent: An Empirical Study of What Motivates Justices in Agency Deference Cases, 110 COLUM. L. REV. 1727, 1784 (2010).
104. Michael S. Moses et al., Investigating the Defeat of Colorado's Amendment 46: An Analysis of Trends and Principal Factors Influencing Voter Behaviors, THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS 1 (September 9, 2010), http://www.civilrights.org/publications/colorado-46/2010-11-12-defeat-of- amendment46- report-final.pdf
105. Harlan Grant Cohen, "Undead" Wartime Cases: Stare Decisis and The Lessons of History, 84 TUL. L. REV. 957, 960 (2010)
106. Neil Gotanda, The Story of Korematsu: The Japanese- American Cases, in CONSTITUTIONAL LAW STORIES 249, 260
107. cf. Joel B. Grossman, The Japanese American Cases and the Vagaries of Constitutional Adjudication in Wartime: An Institutional Perspective, 19 U. HAW. L. REV. 649, 656-67 (1997)
108. Rachel E. Barkow, Institutional Design and the Policing of Prosecutors: Lessons from Administrative Law, 61 STAN. L. REV. 869, 870 (2009)
109. Daniel S. Medwed, The Zeal Deal: Prosecutorial Resistance to Post-Conviction Claims of Innocence, 84 B.U. L. REV. 125, 151-56 (2004)
110. Daniel C. Richman, Old Chief v. United States: Stipulating Away Prosecutorial Accountability?, 83 VA. L. REV. 939, 963 (1997)
111. William J. Stuntz, Substance, Process, and the Civil-Criminal Line, 7 J. CoNTEMP. LEGAL ISSUES 1, 12-13 (1996)
112. Seth F. Kreimer, Exploring the Dark Matter of Judicial Review: A Constitutional Census of the 1990s, 5 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 427, 506-07 (1997)
113. Owen M. Fiss, The Supreme Court, 1978 Term - Foreword: The Forms of Justice, 93 HARV.L. REV. 1,34(1979).
114. John F. Manning, Lessons from a Nondelegation Canon, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1541, 1543 (2008)
115. CASS R. SUNSTEIN, ONE CASE AT A TIME: JUDICIAL MINIMALISM ON THE SUPREME COURT 24 (1999)
116. McNollgast, Positive Canons: The Role of Legislative Bargains in Statutory Interpretation, 80 GEO. L.J. 705, 720 (1992)
117. WILLIAM F. FUNK & RICHARD H. SEAMON, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: EXAMPLES AND EXPLANATIONS 20 (2001).
118. Gillian E. Metzger, Tradeoffs of Candor: Does Judicial Transparency Erode Legitimacy?, 64 N.Y.U. ANN. SURV. AM. L. 459, 466 (2009)
119. Sophia Z. Lee, Race, Sex, and Rulemaking: Administrative Constitutionalism and the Workplace, I960 to the Present, 96 VA. L. REV. 799, 811-44 (2010)
120. ADRIAN VERMEULE, JUDGING UNDER UNCERTAINTY: AN INSTITUTIONAL THEORY OF LEGAL INTERPRETATION 230 (2006)
121. Paul J. Mishkin, Federal Courts as State Reformers, 35 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 949,972-73 (1978)
122. Joan MacLeod Heminway, Rock, Paper, Scissors: Choosing the Right Vehicle for Federal Corporate Governance Initiatives, 10 FORDHAM J. CORP. & FIN. L. 225, 262-64 (2005)
123. Thomas W. Merrill, Preemption and Institutional Choice, 102 Nw. U. L. REV. 727, 746-47 (2008)
124. NEIL K. KOMESAR, LAW'S LIMITS: THE RULE OF LAW AND THE SUPPLY AND DEMAND OF RIGHTS 162 (2001)
125. New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144, 206 (1992)
126. AKHIL REED AMAR, THE BILL OF RIGHTS: CREATION AND RECONSTRUCTION xii (1998)
127. Richard H. Pildes, Why Rights Are Not Trumps: Social Meanings, Expressive Harms, and Constitutionalism, 27 J. LEGAL STUD. 725, 734 (1998)
128. Ronald Dworkin, Rights as Trumps, in THEORIES OF RIGHTS 153, 153
129. RONALD DWORKIN, TAKING RIGHTS SERIOUSLY xi (1977)
130. Richard H. Fallon, Individual Rights and the Powers of Government, 27 GA. L. REV. 343, 369-71 (1993).
131. Stephen Gardbaum, The Myth and the Reality of American Constitutional Exceptionalism, 107 MICH. L. REV. 391, 430 (2008)
132. Gary Lawson, The Rise and Rise of the Administrative State, 107 HARV. L. REV. 1231, 1253 (1994)
133. Edward Rubin, The Myth of Accountability and the Anti-Administrative Impulse, 103 MICH. L. REV. 2073, 2074 (2005)