Perception in graphics, visualization, virtual environments and animation

SIGGRAPH Asia 2011 Courses, SA'11

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  McNamara, Ann ^a   Mania, Katerina ^b   Gutierrez, Diego ^c  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX DATA; DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES; HUMAN BEING; HUMAN VISUAL SYSTEMS; PERCEPTUAL SYSTEM; REALISTIC IMAGERY; SEAMLESS INTEGRATION; SHORT COURSE; VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS;

ANIMATION; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUALIZATION;

CURRICULA;

EID: 84855700741     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2077434.2077448     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (135)

1. B. D. Adelstein, T. G. Lee, and S. R. Ellis. Head tracking latency in virtual environments: Psychophysics and a model. In Proc. of the 47th Annual Human Factors and Ergonomics Society meeting, pages 2083-2087, 2003.
2. Stéphane Albin, Gilles Rougeron, Bernard Péroche, and Alain Trémeau. Quality image metrics for synthetic images based on perceptual color differences. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 11(9):961-971, 2002. (Pubitemid 35250381)
3. Robert S. Allison, Laurence R. Harris, Michael Jenkin, Urszula Jasiobedzka, and James E. Zacher. Tolerance of temporal delay in virtual environments. In VR '01: Proceedings of the Virtual Reality 2001 Conference (VR'01), page 247, Washington, DC, USA, 2001. IEEE Computer Society.
4. D. Ariely. Seeing sets: Representation by statistical properties. Psychological Science, 12(2):157-162, 2001. (Pubitemid 33653525)
5. Ronald Azuma and Gary Bishop. Improving static and dynamic registration in an optical see-through hmd. In SIGGRAPH '94: Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pages 197-204, New York, NY, USA, 1994. ACM.
6. J. H. Bailey and B. G. Witmer. Learning and transfer of spatial knowledge in a virtual environment. Proc. of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, pages 1158-1162, 1994.
7. Dirk Bartz, Douglas Cunningham, Jan Fischer, and Christian Wallraven. Star state of the art report the role of perception for computer graphics, 2008.
8. James P. Bliss, Philip D. Tidwell, and Michael A. Guest. The effectiveness of virtual reality for administering spatial navigation training to firefighters. Presence, 6(1):73-86, 1997.
9. Mark R. Bolin and Gary W. Meyer. A perceptually based adaptive sampling algorithm. Computer Graphics, 32(Annual Conference Series):299-309, August 1998.
10. M.R. Bolin and G.W. Meyer. A frequency based ray tracer. In ACM SIGGRAPH '95 Conference Proceedings, pages 409-418, 1995.
11. K. R. Brandt, J.M. Gardiner, and C. N. Macrae. The distinctiveness effect in forenames: The role of subjective experiences and recognition memory. British Journal of Psychology, pages 269-280, 2006. (Pubitemid 43781326)
12. K. R. Brandt, C.N. Macrae, A.M. Schloerscheidt, and A. B. Milne. Do i know you? target typicality and recollective experience. Memory, 11(1):89-100, 2003.
13. W. Brewer and J. Treyens. Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13:207-230, 1981.
14. D. E. Broadbent and M. H. P. Broadbent. From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Perception and Psychophysics, 42(4):105-113, 1987. (Pubitemid 17152755)
15. T. C. Callaghan. Dimensional interaction of hue and brightness in preat-tentive field segregation. Perception & Psychophysics, 36(1):25-34, 1984.
16. T. C. Callaghan. Interference and domination in texture segregation: Hue, geometric form, and line orientation. Perception & Psychophysics, 46(4):299-311, 1989.
17. T. C. Callaghan. Interference and dominance in texture segregation. In D. Brogan, editor, Visual Search, pages 81-87. Taylor & Francis, New York, New York, 1990.
18. J. Cataliotti and A. Gilchrist. Local and global processes in lightness perception. In Perception and Psychophysics, Volume 57(2), pages 125-135. Perception, 1995.
19. K. Cater, A. Chalmers, and G. Ward. Detail to attention: exploiting visual tasks for selective rendering. In EGRW '03: Proceedings of the 14th Eurographics workshop on Rendering, pages 270-280, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, Switzerland, 2003. Eurographics Association.
20. Heinrich Conference Chair-Bülthoff and Tom Conference Chair-Troscianko. Apgv '05: Proceedings of the 2nd symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization. A Coro na, Spain, 2005.
21. Roland W. Conference Chair-Fleming and Sunghee Conference Chair-Kim. Apgv '06: Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization. Boston, Massachusetts, 2006.
22. Victoria Conference Chair-Interrante, Ann Conference Chair-McNamara, Heinrich Program Chair-Bulthoff, and Holly Program Chair-Rushmeier. Apgv '04: Proceedings of the 1st symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization. Los Angeles, California, 2004.
23. Christian Conference Chair-Wallraven and Veronica Conference Chair-Sundstedt. Apgv '07: Proceedings of the 4th symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization. Tubingen, Germany, 2007.
24. et AL. Conway, M. A. Changes in memory awareness during learning: The acquisition of knowledge by psychology undergraduates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(4):393-413, 1997. (Pubitemid 127458868)
25. Scott Daly. The visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. In Digital images and human vision, pages 179-206, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1993. MIT Press.
26. Kate Devlin, Alan Chalmers, Alexander Wilkie, and Werner Purgathofer. Star: Tone reproduction and physically based spectral rendering. In Dieter Fellner and Roberto Scopignio, editors, State of the Art Reports, Eurographics 2002, pages 101-123, Vienna, September 2002. The Eurographics Association.
27. S. A. Dewhurst, S. J. Holmes, K. R. Brandt, and G. M. Dean. Measuring the speed of the conscious components of recognition memory: Remembering is faster than knowing. Consciousness and Cognition, 15:147-162, 2006.
28. Huong Q. Dinh, Neff Walker, Chang Song, Akira Kobayashi, and Larry F. Hodges. Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments. In VR '99: Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality, page 222, Washington, DC, USA, 1999. IEEE Computer Society.
29. George Drettakis, Nicolas Bonneel, Carsten Dachsbacher, Sylvain Lefebvre, Michael Schwarz, and Isabelle Viaud-Delmon. An interactive perceptual rendering pipeline using contrast and spatial masking. In Rendering Techniques (Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Rendering). Eurographics, June 2007.
30. S. R. Ellis, K. Mania, B. D. Adelstein, and M. I. Hill. Generalizability of latency detection in a variety of virtual environments. In Proc. of the 48th Annual Human Factors and Ergonomics Society meeting, 2004.
31. S. R. Ellis, M. J. Young, S. M. Ehrlich, and B. D. Adelstein. Discrimination of changes of rendering latency during voluntary hand movement. In Proc. of the 43th Annual Human Factors and Ergonomics Society meeting, pages 1182-1186, 1999.
32. S.R. Ellis, A. Wolfram, and B.D. Adelstein. Large amplitude three-dimensional tracking in augmented environments: a human performance trade-off between system latency and update rate. In Proc. of the 46th Annual Human Factors and Ergonomics Society meeting, 2002.
33. Stephen R. Ellis, F. Breant, Brian M. Menges, Richard H. Jacoby, and Bernard D. Adelstein. Operator interaction with visual objects: Effect of system latency. HCI (2), pages 973-976, 1997. (Pubitemid 127129123)
34. Stephen R. Ellis, Mark J. Young, Bernard D. Adelstein, and Sheryl M. Ehrlich. Discrimination of changes in latency during head movement. HCI (2), pages 1129-1133, 1999.
35. Land. M. F. Motion and vision: why animals move their eyes. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioural Physiology, 185(4):341-352, 1999. (Pubitemid 29532283)
36. Jean-Philippe Farrugia and Bernard Péroche. A progressive rendering algorithm using an adaptive perceptually based image metric. Comput. Graph. Forum, 23(3):605-614, 2004.
37. J. Ferwerda. Hi-fi rendering. ACM Siggraph Eurographics campfire on perceptually adaptive graphics. http://isg.cs.tcd.ie/campfire/jimferwerda2.html, 2001.
38. Philip W. Fink, Patrick S. Foo, and William H. Warren. Obstacle avoidance during walking in real and virtual environments. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept., 4(1):2, 2007.
39. R. Flannery, K.A. Walles. How does schema theory apply to real versus virtual memories? Cyberspychology and Behavior, 6(2):151-159, 2003.
40. Harald Frenz, Markus Lappe, Marina Kolesnik, and Thomas Bührmann. Estimation of travel distance from visual motion in virtual environments. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept., 4(1):3, 2007.
41. J. M. Gardiner and A. Richardson-klavehn. Remembering and knowing. In: Tulving, E. and Craik, F. I. M., eds. Handbook of Memory, 1992.
42. S. Gibson and R.J. Hubbold. Efficient hierarchical refinement and clustering for radiosity in complex environments. Computer Graphics Forum, 15(5):297-310, 1996. (Pubitemid 126592354)
43. A. Gilchrist, S. Delman, and A. Jacobsen. The classification and integration of edges as critical to the perception of reflectance and illumination. Perception and Psychophysics, 33(5):425-436, 1983.
44. A. L. Gilchrist. The perception of surface blacks and whites. Scientific American, 240(3):88-97, March 1979.
45. Alan Gilchrist and Alan Jacobsen. Perception of lightness and illumination in a world of one reflectance. Perception, 13:5-19, 1984. (Pubitemid 14036264)
46. Baining Guo. Progressive radiance evaluation using directional coherence maps. In SIGGRAPH '98: Proceedings of the 25th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pages 255-266, New York, NY, USA, 1998. ACM.
47. Jörg Haber, Karol Myszkowski, Hitoshi Yamauchi, and Hans-Peter Seidel. Perceptually guided corrective splatting. Computer Graphics Forum, 20(3), 2001.
48. Christopher G. Healey and James T. Enns. Building perceptual textures to visualize multidimensional datasets. In Proceedings Visualization '98, pages 111-118, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 1998.
49. Christopher G. Healey and James T. Enns. Large datasets at a glance: Combining textures and colors in scientific visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 5(2):145-167, 1999. (Pubitemid 30500047)
50. David Hedley, Adam Worrall, and Derek Paddon. Selective culling of discontinuity lines. In Julie Dorsey and Philipp Slusallek, editors, Rendering Techniques '97 (Proceedings of the Eighth Eurographics Workshop on Rendering), pages 69-80. Springer Wien, 1997. ISBN 3-211-83001-4.
51. R. Held, A. Efsathiouand, and M Greene. Adaptation to displaced and delayed visual feedback from the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(6):887-891, 1966.
52. L. Huang and H. Pashler. A boolean map theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 114(3):599-631, 2007.
53. L. Huang, A. Treisman, and H. Pashler. Characterizing the limits of human visual awareness. Science, 317:823-825, 2007. (Pubitemid 47257923)
54. Laurent Itti, Christof Koch, and Ernst Niebur. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 20(11):1254-1259, 1998. (Pubitemid 128742001)
55. B. Julész. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 1971.
56. B. Julész. Experiments in the visual perception of texture. Scientific American, 232:34-43, 1975.
57. B. Julész. A theory of preattentive texture discrimination based on firstorder statistics of textons. Biological Cybernetics, 41:131-138, 1981. (Pubitemid 11003112)
58. B. Julész, E. N. Gilbert, and L. A. Shepp. Inability of humans to discriminate between visual textures that agree in second-order statistics - revisited. Perception, 2:391-405, 1973.
59. B. Julész, E. N. Gilbert, and J. D. Victor. Visual discrimination of textures with identical third-order statistics. Biological Cybernetics, 31:137-140, 1978. (Pubitemid 9065753)
60. J. Y. Jung, B. D. Adelstein, and S. R. Ellis. Discriminability of prediction artifacts in a time delayed virtual environment. In Proc. of the 44th Annual Human Factors and Ergonomics Society meeting, pages 499-502, 2000.
61. Grzegorz Krawczyk, Karol Myszkowski, and Hans-Peter Seidel. Lightness perception in tone reproduction for high dynamic range images. In The European Association for Computer Graphics 26th Annual Conference EUROGRAPHICS 2005, Volume 24 of Computer Graphics Forum, pages xx-xx, Dublin, Ireland, 2005. Blackwell.
62. Grzegorz Krawczyk, Karol Myszkowski, and Hans-Peter Seidel. Computational model of lightness perception in high dynamic range imaging. In Bernice E. Rogowitz, Thrasyvoulos N. Pappas, and Scott J. Daly, editors, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XI, IS&T SPIE's 18th Annual Symposium on Electronic Imaging (2006), volume xxxx, pages xxx-xxx, 2006.
63. Gregory Ward Larson, Holly Rushmeier, and Christine Piatko. A Visibility Matching Tone Reproduction Operator for High Dynamic Range Scenes. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 3(4):291-306, October 1997. (Pubitemid 127771597)
64. William B. Lathrop and Mary K. Kaiser. Perceived orientation in physical and virtual environments: changes in perceived orientation as a function of idiothetic information available. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ., 11(1):19-32, 2002.
65. Guillaume Lavoué. A roughness measure for 3d mesh visual masking. In APGV '07: Proceedings of the 4th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, pages 57-60, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. (Pubitemid 350228925)
66. A. Liu, S. Tharp, L. Lai, French, and L. Stark. Some of what one needs to know about using head-mounted displays to improve teleoperator performance. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 9(5):638-648, 1995.
67. G. Liu, E. Austen, K. Booth, B. Fischer, M. Rempel, and J. Enns. Multiple object tracking is based on scene, not retinal, coordinates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(2):235-247, 2005. (Pubitemid 40579816)
68. G. R. Loftus and N. H. Mackworth. Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Educational Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4(4):565-572, 1978.
69. A. Mack and I. Rock. Inattentional Blindness. MIT Press, Menlo Park, California, 2000.
70. G. W. Maconcie and L.C. Loschky. Human performance with a gaze linked multi-resolutional display. In Proceedings of the Advanced Displays and Interactive Displays First Annual Symposium 1997, pages 25-34, 1997.
71. K. Mania, A. Robinson, and K. Brandt. The effect of memory schemata on object recognition in virtual environments. Presence, Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14(5):606-615, 2005. (Pubitemid 43550682)
72. K. Mania, T. Troscianko, R. Hawkes, and A. Chalmers. Fidelity metrics for virtual environment simulations based on human judgments of spatial memory awareness states. Presence, Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(3):296-310, 2003. (Pubitemid 36739310)
73. Katerina Mania, Bernard D. Adelstein, Stephen R. Ellis, and Michael I. Hill. Perceptual sensitivity to head tracking latency in virtual environments with varying degrees of scene complexity. In APGV '04: Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, pages 39-47, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. (Pubitemid 40290740)
74. Katerina Mania, Shahrul Badariah, Matthew Coxon, and Phil Watten. Cognitive transfer of spatial awareness states from immersive virtual environments to reality. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept., 7(2):1-14, 2010.
75. Katerina Mania, Dave Wooldridge, Matthew Coxon, and Andrew Robinson. The effect of visual and interaction fidelity on spatial cognition in immersive virtual environments. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 12(3):396-404, 2006.
76. Rafal Mantiuk, Karol Myszkowski, and Hans-Peter Seidel. A perceptual framework for contrast processing of high dynamic range images. In APGV '05: Proceedings of the 2nd symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, pages 87-94, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. (Pubitemid 43004917)
77. G Marmitt and A. Duchowski. Modeling visual attention in vr: measuring the accuracy of predicted scanpaths. Proceedings of Eurographics 2002, Short Presentations, pages 217-226, 2002.
78. Jeffrey McCandless, Stephen R. Ellis, and Bernard D. Adelstein. Localization of a time-delayed, monocular virtual object superimposed on a real environment. Presence, 9(1):15-24, 2000.
79. B. H. McCormick, T. A. DeFanti, and M. D. Brown. Visualization in scientific computing. Computer Graphics, 21(6):1-14, 1987.
80. A. McNamara. Evaluating image quality metrics vs. human evaluation. ACM SIGGRAPH 2000 Sketches Program, 2000.
81. Ann McNamara. Visual perception in realistic image synthesis. Comput. Graph. Forum, 20(4):211-224, 2001.
82. Ann McNamara. Visual perception in realistic image synthesis. Comput. Graph. Forum, 20(4):211-224, 2001.
83. Michael Meehan, Sharif Razzaque, Mary C. Whitton, and Frederick P. Brooks, Jr. Effect of latency on presence in stressful virtual environments. In VR '03: Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality 2003, page 141, Washington, DC, USA, 2003. IEEE Computer Society.
84. G. W. Meyer and A. Liu. Color spatial acuity control of a screen subdivision image synthesis algorithm. Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display, 1666(3):387-399, 1992.
85. Don P. Mitchell. Generating antialiased images at low sampling densities. Computer Graphics, 21(4):65-72, July 1987.
86. Yann Morvan and Carol O'Sullivan. A perceptual approach to trimming unstructured lumigraphs. In APGV '07: Proceedings of the 4th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, pages 61-68, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
87. N. Mourkoussis, F. Rivera, T. Troscianko, T. Dixon, R. Hawkes, and K. Mania. Quantifying fidelity for virtual environment simulations employing memory schema assumptions. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2010.
88. K. Myszkowski. The visible differences predictor: Applications to global illumination problems. In G. Drettakis and N. Max, editors, Rendering Techniques '98 (Proceedings of Eurographics Rendering Workshop '98), pages 233-236, New York, NY, 1998. Springer Wien.
89. K. Myszkowski, A. B. Khodulev, and E. A. Kopylov. Validating global illumination algorithms and software. In Visual Proceedings, Technical Sketch at ACM Siggraph 1997, 1997.
90. U. Neisser. The control of information pickup in selective looking. In A. D. Pick, editor, Perception and its Development: A Tribute to Eleanor J. Gibson, pages 201-219. Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Hilsdale, New Jersey, 1979.
91. K. Nemire, R. H. Jacoby, and S. R. Ellis. Simulation fidelity of a virtual environment display. Human Factors, 36(1):1994, 1994.
92. Carol O'Sullivan, Sarah Howlett, Yann Morvan, Rachel McDonnell, and Keith O'Conor. Perceptually Adaptive Graphics. In Christophe Schlick and Werner Purgathofer, editors, STAR-Proceedings of Eurographics 2004, number STAR-6 in State of the Art Reports, pages 141-164. INRIA and the Eurographics Association, 2004.
93. A. J. Parkin, J. M. Gardiner, and R. Rosser. Functional aspects of recollective experience in face recognition. Consciousness and Cognition, 4(4):387-398, 1995.
94. S. N. Pattanaik, J. A. Ferwerda, D. A. Greenberg, and M. D. Fairchild. A multiscale model of adaptation and spatial vision for realistic imaging. In Computer Graphics (ACM SIGGRAPH '98 Proceedings), pages 287-298, 1998.
95. Bobby Program Chair-Bodenheimer, Carol Program Chair-O'Sullivan, Katerina Conference Chair-Mania, and Bernhard Conference Chair-Riecke. Apgv '09: Proceedings of the 6th symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization. Chania, Crete, Greece, 2009.
96. Sarah Program Chair-Creem-Regehr and Karol Program Chair-Myszkowski. Apgv '08: Proceedings of the 5th symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization. Los Angeles, California, 2008.
97. P. Rademacher, J. Lengyel, E. Cutrell, and T. Whitted. Measuring the perception of visual realism in images, 2001.
98. Ganesh Ramanarayanan, Kavita Bala, and James A. Ferwerda. Perception of complex aggregates. In SIGGRAPH '08: ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 papers, pages 1-10, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
99. Ganesh Ramanarayanan, James Ferwerda, Bruce Walter, and Kavita Bala. Visual equivalence: towards a new standard for image fidelity. In SIGGRAPH '07: ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 papers, page 76, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
100. Mahesh Ramasubramanian, Sumanta N. Pattanaik, and Donald P. Greenberg. A perceptually based physical error metric for realistic image synthesis. In SIGGRAPH '99: Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pages 73-82, New York, NY, USA, 1999. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
101. J. E. Raymond, K. L. Shapiro, and K. M. Arnell. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18(3):849-860, 1992.
102. Matthew J. P. Regan, Gavin S. P. Miller, Steven M. Rubin, and Chris Kogelnik. A real-time low-latency hardware light-field renderer. In SIG-GRAPH '99: Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pages 287-290, New York, NY, USA, 1999. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
103. Erik Reinhard, Michael Stark, Peter Shirley, and James Ferwerda. Photographic tone reproduction for digital images. In SIGGRAPH '02: Proceedings of the 29th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pages 267-276, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM Press.
104. R. A. Rensink, J. K. O'Regan, and J. J. Clark. To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8:368-373, 1997. (Pubitemid 127455296)
105. Ronald A. Rensink. Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing. Vision Research, 40(10-12):1469-1487, 2000. (Pubitemid 30216461)
106. James C. Rodger and Roger A. Browse. Choosing rendering parameters for effective communication of 3d shape. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 20(2):20-28, 2000. (Pubitemid 30568639)
107. Thomas B. Sheridan. Remote manipulative control with transmission delay. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, 4(1):25-29, 1963.
108. Thomas B. Sheridan. Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence, 1(1):120-125, 1992.
109. D. J. Simons and R. A. Rensink. Change blindness: Past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(1):16-20, 2005. (Pubitemid 40091928)
110. Daniel J. Simons. Current approaches to change blindness. Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3):1-15, 2000. (Pubitemid 30353618)
111. P. H. Smith and J. Van Rosendale. Data and visualization corridors report on the 1998 CVD workshop series (sponsored by DOE and NSF). Technical Report CACR-164, Center for Advanced Computing Research, California Institute of Technology, 1998.
112. Stephen Spencer, editor. APGV '10: Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. 106103.
113. William A. Stokes, James A. Ferwerda, Bruce J. Walter, and Donald P. Greenberg. Perceptual illumination compone high quality global illumination rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 23(3):742-749, 2004.
114. Veronica Sundstedt, Efstathios Stavrakis, Michael Wimmer, and Erik Reinhard. A psychophysical study of fixation behavior in a computer game. In APGV '08: Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, pages 43-50, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
115. J. J. Thomas and K. A. Cook. Illuminating the Path: Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. IEEE Press, Piscataway, New Jersey, 2005.
116. A. Treisman. Preattentive processing in vision. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 31:156-177, 1985.
117. A. Treisman. Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17(3):652-676, 1991.
118. A. Treisman and S. Gormican. Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95(1):15-48, 1988.
119. E. Tulving. Elements of Episodic Memory. Oxford: Oxford Science Publications, 1992.
120. Jack Tumblin and Holly E. Rushmeier. Tone Reproduction for Realistic Images. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 13(6):42-48, November 1993.
121. S. Uno and M. Slater. The sensitivity of presence to collision response. In VRAIS '97: Proceedings of the 1997 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (VRAIS '97), page 95, Washington, DC, USA, 1997. IEEE Computer Society.
122. C.J. van den Branden Lambrecht. Perceptual models and architectures for video coding applications. PhD thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Federal de Lausanne, 1996.
123. David Waller, Earl Hunt, and David Knapp. The transfer of spatial knowledge in virtual environment training. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ., 7(2):129-143, 1998.
124. B.J. Walter. Density estimation techniques for global illumination. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, 1998.
125. Leonard Wanger. The effect of shadow quality on the perception of spatial relationships in computer generated imagery. In I3D '92: Proceedings of the 1992 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, pages 39-42, New York, NY, USA, 1992. ACM.
126. Colin Ware. Information Visualization: Perception for Design, 2nd Edition. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, California, 2004.
127. Benjamin Watson, Neff Walker, Larry F. Hodges, and Martin Reddy. An evaluation of level of detail degradation in head-mounted display peripheries. Presence, 6(6):630-637, 1997.
128. Benjamin Watson, Neff Walker, Peter Woytiuk, and William Ribarsky. Maintaining usability during 3d placement despite delay. In VR '03: Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality 2003, page 133, Washington, DC, USA, 2003. IEEE Computer Society.
129. R. B. Welch, T. T. Blackmon, A. Liu, B. A. Mellers, and L. W. Stark. The effects of pictorial realism, delay of visual feedback and observer interactivity on the subjective sense of presence. Presence, Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5(3):263-273, 1996.
130. Betsy Williams, Gayathri Narasimham, Claire Westerman, John Rieser, and Bobby Bodenheimer. Functional similarities in spatial representations between real and virtual environments. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept., 4(2):12, 2007.
131. Jeremy M. Wolfe. Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2):202-238, 1994.
132. Jeremy M. Wolfe and Kyle R. Cave. Deploying visual attention: The Guided Search model. In T. Troscianko and A. Blake, editors, AI and the Eye, pages 79-103. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester, United Kingdom, 1989.
133. Jeremy M. Wolfe, Kyle R. Cave, and Susan L. Franzel. Guided Search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15(3):419-433, 1989.
134. P Zimmons. The Influence of Lighting Quality on Presence and task Performance in Virtual Environment, Unpublished PhD thesis. PhD thesis, University of North Carolina, ftp://ftp.cs.unc.edu/pub/publications/techreports/ 04-017.pdf, 2005.
135. Alexandros Zotos, Katerina Mania, and Nicholaos Mourkoussis. A schema-based selective rendering framework. In APGV '09: Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, pages 85-92, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.