Perception of complex aggregates

SIGGRAPH'08: International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 Papers 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Ramanarayanan, Ganesh ^a   Bala, Kavita ^a   Ferwerda, James A ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology

^b ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aggregates; Complexity; Perceptually based modeling

Indexed keywords

COMMON SOURCES; COMPLEX AGGREGATES; COMPLEXITY; INDIVIDUAL OBJECTS; MATERIAL PROPERTIES; OVERALL PROPERTIES; PERCEPTUALLY-BASED MODELING; PROOF OF CONCEPTS; PSYCHOPHYSICAL EXPERIMENTS; VISUAL CODING;

COLOR PHOTOGRAPHY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; EXPERIMENTS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

AGGREGATES;

EID: 57649103947     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (53)

1. BACON, W. F., AND EGETH, H. E. 1991. Local processes in preattentive feature detection. J. Exp. Psych.: Human Percep. and Perf. 17,11-90.
2. BECK, J. 1972. Similarity grouping and peripheral discriminability under uncertainty. American Journal of Psychology 85, 1-19.
3. BECK, J. 1982. Textural segmentation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 285-317.
4. BERGEN, J. R., AND ADELSON, E. H. 1988. Early vision and texture perception. Nature 333, 6171, 363-365.
5. BROWNBILL, A. 1996. Reducing the storage required to render L-system based models. Ph.D. thesis, University of Calgary.
6. COHEN, J., OLANO, M., AND MANOCHA, D. 1998. Appearance-preserving simplification. In SIGGRAPH '98, ACM, New York, NY, USA 115-122.
7. COOK, R. L., HALSTEAD, J., PLANCK, M., AND RYU, D. 2007. Stochastic simplification of aggregate detail. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3, 79.
8. DEBEVEC, P. E., AND MALIK, J. 1997. Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs. In SIGGRAPH '97, 369-378.
9. DESIMONE, R., AND DUNCAN, J. 1995. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 18, 193-222.
10. DEUSSEN, O., HANRAHAN, P., LINTERMANN, B., MĚCH, R., PHARR, M., AND PRUSINKIEWICZ, P. 1998. Realistic modeling and rendering of plant ecosystems. In SIGGRAPH '98, 275-286.
11. DUNBAR, D., AND HUMPHREYS, G. 2006. A spatial data structure for fast poisson-disk sample generation. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 3, 503-508.
12. FERWERDA, J. A., PELLACINI, F., AND GREENBERG, D. P. 2001. A psychophysically-based model of surface gloss perception. In Proceedings of the SPIE: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging VI, vol. 4299, 291-301.
13. FLEMING, R. W., TORRALBA, A., AND ADELSON, E. H. 2004. Specular reflections and the perception of shape. Journal of Vision 4, 9, 798-820.
14. FOUND, A., AND MÜLLER, H. J. 1995. Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: further evidence for a 'dimension weighting' account. Perception and Psychophysics 58, 1, 88-101.
15. GURNSEY, R., AND BROWSE, R. A. 1989. Asymmetries in visual texture discrimination. Spatial Vision 4, 31-14.
16. HART, J.C. 1992. The object instancing paradigm for linear fractal modeling. Proceedings of Graphics Interfaces, 224-231.
17. HEAPS, C, AND HANDEL, S. 1999. Similarity and features of natural textures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25, 2, 299-320.
18. ITTI, L., AND KOCH, C. 2001. Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 3 (Mar), 194-203.
19. JULESZ, B. 1962. Visual pattern discrimination. IRE Transactions on Information Theory 8, 84-92.
20. JULESZ, B. 1981. Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions. Nature 290, 91-97.
21. KHAN, E. A., REINHARD, E., FLEMING, R. W., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. 2006. Image-based material editing. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 3, 654-663.
22. KOCH, C, AND ULLMAN, S. 1985. Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology 4, 219-227.
23. KOFFKA, K. 1935. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York, NY.
24. LEE, C. H., VARSHNEY, A., AND JACOBS, D. W. 2005. Mesh saliency. ACM Trans. Graph. 24, 3, 659-666.
25. LUEBKE, D. R, AND HALLEN, B. 2001. Perceptually-driven simplification for interactive rendering. In Proceedings of the 12th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Techniques, Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 223-234.
26. LUEBKE, D., REDDY, M., COHEN, J., VARSHNEY, A., WATSON, B., AND HUEBNER, R. 2002. Level of Detail for Computer Graphics. Morgan Kaufmann.
27. MALIK, J., AND PERONA, P. 1990. Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 7, 923-932.
28. MANTIUK, R., DALY, S., MYSZKOWSKI, K., AND SEIDEL, H.-P. 2005. Predicting visible differences in high dynamic range images - model and its calibration. In Proceeindgs of the SP1E: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging X, vol. 5666, 204-214.
29. MARR, D. 1976. Early processing of visual information. Phil. Trans, of the Royal Society London B 275, 483-519.
30. NOTHDURFT, H. C. 1985. Sensitivity for structure gradient in texture discrimination tasks. Vision Research 25, 1957-1968.
31. OLIVA, A., AND TORRALBA, A. 2001. Modeling the shape of a scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision 42, 3, 145-175.
32. OLIVA, A., MACK, M. L., SRESTHA, M., AND PEEPER, A. 2004. Identifying the perceptual dimensions of visual complexity of scenes. 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
33. PALMER, S. E. 1999. Vision science: From Photons to Phenomenology. Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
34. PERLIN, K. 2002. Improving noise. In SIGGRAPH '02, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 681-682.
35. POTTER, M. C. 1975. Meaning in visual search. Science 187, 4180, 965-966.
36. RAMANARAYANAN, G., FERWERDA, L, WALTER, B., AND BALA, K. 2007. Visual equivalence: towards a new standard for image fidelity. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3, 76.
37. RAO, A. R., AND LOHSE, G. L. 1993. Identifying high-level features of texture perception. Graphical Models and Image Processing 55, 218-233.
38. ROSENHOLTZ, R., LI, Y., AND NAKANO, L. 2007. Measuring visual clutter. J. Vis. 7, 2 (8), 1-22.
39. RUSHMEIER, H., ROGOWITZ, B. E., AND PIATKO, C. 2000. Perceptual issues in substituting texture for geometry. In Proceedings of the SPIE: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging V, vol. 3959, 372-383.
40. SAGI, D., AND JULESZ, B. 1987. Short-range limitation on detection of feature differences. Spatial Vision 2, 1, 39-49.
41. SMITH, A. R. 1984. Plants, fractals, and formal languages. In SIGGRAPH '84, 1-10.
42. SUTHERLAND, I. E. 1963. A man-machine graphical communication system. Proceedings of the Spring Joint Computer Conference.
43. THEEUWES, J. 2004. Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psvchonomic Bulletin and Review 11, 1, 65-70.
44. TODD, J. T., NORMAN, J. F., KOENDERINK, J. J., AND RAPPERS, A. M. L. 1997. Effects of texture, illumination, and surface reflectance on stereoscopic shape perception. Perception 26,7, 807-822.
45. TREISMAN, A., AND GELADE, G. 1980. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12, 97-136.
46. VANGORP, P., LAURIJSSEN, J., AND DUTRÉ, P. 2007. The influence of shape on the perception of material reflectance. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3, 77.
47. WALTER, B., FERNANDEZ, S., ARBREE, A., BALA, K., DONIKIAN, M., AND GREENBERG, D. P. 2005. Lightcuts: a scalable approach to illumination. ACM Trans. Graph. 24, 3, 1098-1107.
48. WALTER, B., ARBREE, A., BALA, K., AND GREENBERG, D. P. 2006. Multidimensional lightcuts. ACM Trans. Graph. 24, 3, 1081-1088.
49. WARD, G. J. 1992. Measuring and modeling anisotropic reflection. In SIGGRAPH '92, 265-272.
50. WATSON, A. B., AND PELLI, D. G. 1983. Quest: a bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception and Psychophysics 53,2,113-120.
51. WATSON, B., WALKER, N., AND HODGES, L. F. 2004. Supra-threshold control of peripheral LOD. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3, 750-759.
52. WICHMANN, F. A., AND HILL, N. J. 2001. The psychometric function ii: Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Perception and Psychophysics 63, 8, 1314-1329.
53. WOLFE, J. M. 1998. Visual search. University College London Press, London.