A schema-based selective rendering framework

Proceedings - APGV 2009: Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 85-92

  Zotos, Alexandros ^a   Mania, Katerina ^a   Mourkoussis, Nicholaos ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION MODELING; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; HIGH QUALITY; LEVEL OF DETAIL; PHOTOREALISTIC IMAGES; RENDERING ALGORITHMS; SCENE OBJECT; SCHEMAS; SELECTIVE RENDERING; TASK-BASED INFORMATION;

METADATA;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 70450194889     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1620993.1621011     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. BARTLETT, F. C. 1932. Remembering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, p-213.
2. BREWER, W. F. & TREYENS, J. C. 1981. Role of Schemata in Memory for Places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207-230.
3. BROOKS JR, F. P. 1999. What's Real About Virtual Reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 16-27.
4. CATER, K., CHALMERS, A., WARD G. 2003. Detail to Attention: Exploiting Visual Tasks for Selective Rendering. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Rendering.
5. FERWERDA, J. 2001. Hi-Fi rendering. ACM Siggraph Eurographics campfire on perceptually adaptive graphics. http://isg.cs.tcd.ie/campfire/jimferwerda2. html.
6. FLANNERY, K. A. WALLES, R. 2003. How does schema theory apply to real versus virtual memories? Cyberspychology and Behavior, 6, 2, 151-159.
7. HABER, J., MYSZKOWSKI, K., YAMAUCHI, H., SEIDEL, H. P. 2001. Perceptually guided corrective splatting, Computer Graphics Forum, 20, 3, 142-152.
8. ITTI, L., KOCH, C., NEIBUR, E. 1998. A Model of Saliencybased Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(11), 1254-1259.
9. LAND. M. F. 1999. Motion and vision: why animals move their eyes. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioural Physiology, 185, 4, 341-352, 1999.
10. LOFTUS, G. R., MACKWORTH, N. H. 1978. Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Educational Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 4, 565-572, 1978.
11. MACONCIE, G. W., LOSCHKY, L. C. 1997. Human performance with a gaze linked multi-resolutional display. In Proceedings of the Advanced Displays and Interactive Displays First Annual Symposium 1997, 25-34. ARL Federated laboratory advanced displays and interactive displays consortium.
12. MANIA, K. & CHALMERS, A. 2001. The Effects of Levels of Immersion on Presence and Memory in Virtual Environments: A Reality Centred Approach. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4(2), 247-264.
13. MANIA, K., ADELSTEIN, B., ELLIS, S. R., HILL, M. 2004. Perceptual Sensitivity to Head Tracking Latency in Virtual Environments with Varying Degrees of Scene Complexity. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization 2004, ACM, 39-47.
14. MANIA, K., ROBINSON, A. 2003. Simulating Spatial Assumptions. Technical Sketch. ACM SIGGRAPH 2003, San Diego, USA.
15. MANIA, K., ROBINSON, A. 2004. The Effect of Quality of Rendering on User Lighting Impressions and Presence in Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the ACM Siggraph International conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and its Applications in Industry 2004, Singapore. ACM, 200-205.
16. MANIA, K., TROSCIANKO, T., HAWKES, R., CHALMERS, A. 2003. Fidelity Metrics for Virtual Environment Simulations based on Human Judgments of Spatial Memory Awareness States. Presence, Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(3), 296-310, MIT Press.
17. MANIA, K., ROBINSON, A., BRANDT, K. 2005. The effect of memory schemata on object recognition in virtual environments, Presence, Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14, 5, 606-615.
18. MARMITT, G., DUCHOWSKI, A. T. 2002. Modeling visual attention in VR: measuring the accuracy of predicted scanpaths. In Proceedings of Eurographics 2002, Short Presentations, 217-226.
19. MCNAMARA, A. 2001. Visual Perception in Realistic Image Synthesis', Computer Graphics Forum, Volume 20, #4.
20. MOURKOUSSIS, N., RIVERA, F., TROSCIANKO, T., DIXON, T., HAWKES, R., MANIA, K. Accepted for publication 2009. Quantifying Fidelity for Virtual Environment simulations employing memory schema assumptions. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception.
21. ROJAN, K., PETTIGREW, T. F. 1992. Memory for schemarelevant information: a meta-analytic resolution. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 2, 81-109.
22. RUSHMEIER, H., WARD, G., PIATCO, C., SANDERS, P., RUST, B. 1995 Comparing Real and Synthetic Images: Some ideas about metrics. In Proceedings of EGRW 1995.
23. SUNDSTEDT, V., STAVRAKIS, E., WIMMER, M., REINHARD, E. 2008. A Psychophysical Study of Fixation Behavior in a Computer Game. In Proceedings of APGV 2008 - Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization 2008, 43-50.
24. TROSCIANKO, T., MOURKOUSSIS, N., RIVERA, F., MANIA, K., DIXON, T., HAWKES, R. 2007. Memory for objects in virtual environments, Journal of Vision, Volume 7, Number 9, 763a.
25. WATSON, B. A., WALKER, N., HODGES, L. F., REDDY, M. 1997. An evaluation of level of detail degradation in headmounted display peripheries. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6, 6, 630-637, 1997.
26. T. D. WICKENS. 2001. Elementary Signal Detection Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.