Impact of a community-based intervention on serving and intake of vegetables among low-income, rural appalachian families

Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 36-45

  Wenrich, Tionni R ^a   Brown, J Lynne ^a   Wilson, Robin Taylor ^a,b   Lengerich, Eugene J ^a,b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENN STATE CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Appalachia; Community based intervention; Family meals; Low income; Vegetable intake

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; POVERTY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; VEGETABLE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; APPALACHIAN REGION; CHILD; DIET SURVEYS; FEMALE; FOOD HABITS; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; MALE; PENNSYLVANIA; POVERTY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; VEGETABLES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855673937     PISSN: 14994046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Van Duyn M.A., Pivonka E. Overview of the health benefits of fruit and vegetable consumption for the dietetics professional: selected literature. J Am Diet Assoc 2000, 100:1511-1521.
2. United States Department of Agriculture. MyPlate Web site. Updated July 12, 2011. Accessed July 28, 2011. http://www.choosemyplate.gov/.
3. Casagrande S.S., Wang Y., Anderson C., et al. Have Americans increased their fruit and vegetable intake? the trends between 1988 and 2002. Am J Prev Med 2007, 32:257-263.
4. Guenther P.M., Dodd K.W., Reedy J., et al. Most Americans eat much less than the recommended amounts of fruits and vegetables. J Am Diet Assoc 2006, 106:1371-1379.
5. Healthy People 2010 2000, US Department of Health and HumanServices, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
6. Maclellan D., Gottschall-Pass K., Larsen R. Fruit and vegetable consumption: benefits and barriers. Can J Diet Pract Res 2004, 65:101-105.
7. Treiman K., Freimuth V., Damron D., et al. Attitudes and behaviors related to fruits and vegetables among low-income women in the WIC program. J Nutr Educ 1996, 28:149-156.
8. Ammerman A, Lindquist CH, Hersey JC, etal. Efficacy of Interventions to Modify Dietary Behavior Related to Cancer Risk. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality; 2001.Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 25 (contract No. 290-97-0011 to the Research Triangle Institute-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-based Practice Center), AHRQ Publication No. 01-E029.
9. Ciliska D., Miles E., O'Brien, et al. Effectiveness of community-based interventions to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. J Nutr Educ 2000, 32:341-352.
10. Stables G.J., Subar A.F., Patterson B.H., et al. Changes in vegetable and fruit consumption and awareness among US adults: results of the 1991 and 1997 5 A Day for Better Health Program surveys. J Am Diet Assoc 2002, 102:809-817.
11. Satia J.A., Kristal A.R., Patterson R.E., et al. Psychosocial factors and dietary habits associated with vegetable consumption. Nutrition 2002, 18:247-254.
12. Trudeau E., Kristal A.R., Li S., et al. Demographic and psychosocial predictors of vegetable and fruit intakes differ: implications for dietary interventions. J Am Diet Assoc 1998, 98:1412-1417.
13. Johnston C.S., Taylor C.A., Hampl J.S. More Americans are eating "5 a day" but intakes of dark green and cruciferous vegetables remain low. J Nutr 2000, 130:3063-3067.
14. Barker M., Lawrence W.T., Skinner T.C., et al. Constraints on food choices of women in the UK with lower educational attainment. Public Health Nutr 2008, 11:1229-1237.
15. Bradbard S., Michaels E.F., Fleming K., et al. Understanding the Food Choices of Low-Income Families: Summary Of Findings 1997, US Department of Agriculture Food & Consumer Service, Alexandria, VA.
16. Brown J.L., Miller D. Couples' gender role preferences and management of family food preferences. J Nutr Educ Behav 2002, 34:215-223.
17. Hampson S.E., Martin J., Jorgensen J., et al. A social marketing approach to improving the nutrition of low-income women and children: an initial focus group study. Public Health Nutr 2009, 12:1563-1568.
18. Kerr M., Charles N. Servers and providers: the distribution of food within the family. Soc Rev 1986, 34:115-157.
19. Harnack L., Story M., Martinson B., et al. Guess who's cooking? the role of men in meal planning, shopping, and preparation in US families. J Am Diet Assoc 1998, 98:995-1000.
20. Wenrich T.R., Brown J.L., Miller-Day M., Kelley K.J., Lengerich E.J. Family members' influence on family meal vegetable choices. J Nutr Educ Behav 2010, 42:225-234.
21. Baranowski T., Perry C.L., Parcel G.S. How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact; social cognitive theory. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice 1997, 153-178. Jossey-Bass Inc, San Francisco, CA. 2nd ed. K. Glanz, F.M. Lewis, B.K. Rimer (Eds.).
22. Wenrich T.R., Brown J.L. Assessing educational materials using cognitive interviews can improve and support lesson design. J Ext 2007, 45. 3TOT4, Accessed July 28, 2011. http://www.joe.org/joe/2007june/tt4.php.
23. Townsend M.S., Kaiser L.L. Development of a tool to assess psychosocial indicators of fruit and vegetable intake for 2 federal programs. J Nutr Educ Behav 2005, 37:170-184.
24. Subar A.F., Thompson F.E., Kipnis V., et al. Comparative validation of the Block, Willett and National Cancer Institute Food Frequency Questionnaires: the Eating at America's Table Study. Am J Epidemiol 2001, 154:1089-1099.
25. Greene G.W., Resnicow K., Thompson F.E., et al. Correspondence of the NCI Fruit and Vegetable Screener to repeat 24-h recalls and serum carotenoids in behavioral intervention trials. J Nutr 2008, 138(suppl):200S-204S.
26. Gueorguieva R., Krystal J.H. Move over ANOVA: progress in analyzing repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers published in the Archives of General Psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004, 61:310-317.
27. De Nooijer J., Van Assema P., De Vet E., et al. How stable are stages of change for nutrition behaviors in the Netherlands?. Health Promot Int 2005, 20:27-32.
28. Block G., Wakimoto P., Metz D., et al. A randomized trial of the Little by Little CD-ROM: demonstrated effectiveness in increasing fruit and vegetable intake in a low-income population. Prev Chronic Dis 2004, 1:A08. Accessed July 28, 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2004/jul/04_0016.htm.
29. Havas S., Anliker J., Damron D., et al. Final results of the Maryland WIC 5-A-Day promotion program. Am J Public Health 1998, 88:1161-1167.
30. Kramer M.S. Clinical trials. Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, a Primer for Clinical Investigators and Decision-Makers 1988, 78-92. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. M.S. Kramer (Ed.).
31. Alexander G.L., McClure J.B., Calvi J.H., et al. A randomized clinical trial evaluating online interventions to improve fruit and vegetable consumption. Am J Public Health 2010, 100:319-326.
32. Resnicow K., Campbell M.K., Carr C., et al. Body and soul: a dietary intervention conducted through African-American churches. Am J Prev Med 2004, 27:97-105.
33. Resnicow K., Jackson A., Wang T., et al. A motivational interviewing intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake through black churches: results of the Eat for Life trial. Am J Public Health 2001, 91:1686-1693.
34. Thompson F.E., Subar A.F. Dietary assessment methodology. Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease 2008, 3-39. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 2nd ed. A.M. Coulston, C.J. Boushey (Eds.).