IOP measured by dynamic contour tonometry correlates with IOP measured by goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry in Japanese individuals

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 35-40

  Ito, Ken ^a   Tawara, Akihiko ^a   Kubota, Toshiaki ^a   Harada, Yukinori ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (Japan)

Author keywords

dynamic contour tonometry; Goldmann applanation tonometry; noncontact tonometry; ocular pulse amplitude; pulse pressure

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CORNEA CURVATURE; CORNEA THICKNESS; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETRY; EYE AXIS LENGTH; FEMALE; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; JAPANESE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON CONTACT TONOMETRY; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; TONOMETER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; BLOOD PRESSURE; CHILD; CORNEA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LOW TENSION GLAUCOMA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855457936     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: 1536481X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820275b4     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Leske MC. The epidemiology of open angle glaucoma: a review. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;118:166-191. (Pubitemid 13029361)
2. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38:1-30. (Pubitemid 23234285)
3. Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL. Dynamic contour tonometry: a comparative study on human cadaver eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1287-1293. (Pubitemid 39180848)
4. Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Robert YC. Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:344-350. (Pubitemid 41383326)
5. Langham ME, To'Mey KF. A clinical procedure for the measurements of ocular pulse-pressure relationship and the ophthalmic arterial pressure. Exp Eye Res. 1978;27:17-25. (Pubitemid 8360083)
6. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Robert YC, et al. Ocular pulse amplitude in healthy subjects as measured by dynamic contour tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:1104-1108. (Pubitemid 44232339)
7. Stalmans I, Harris A, Vanbellinghen V, et al. Ocular pulse amplitude in normal tension and primary open angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2008;17:403-407.
8. Dohadwala AA, Munger R, Damji KF. Positive correlation between Tono-pen intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1849-1854. (Pubitemid 28509724)
9. Shiose Y, Kitazawa Y, Tsukahara S, et al. Epidemiology of glaucoma in Japan: a nationwide glaucoma survey. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1991;35:133-155.
10. Wu LL, Suzuki Y, Ideta R, et al. Central corneal thickness of normal tension glaucoma patients in Japan. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2000;44:643-647.
11. Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M, et al. The prevalence ofprimary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi study. Ophthal-mology. 2004;111:1641-1648. (Pubitemid 39179676)
12. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310. (Pubitemid 16134762)
13. Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:2-6. (Pubitemid 43068411)
14. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3118-3121. (Pubitemid 39121844)
15. Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S, et al. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a com-parative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005; 243:763-767. (Pubitemid 41300416)
16. Realini T, Weinreb RN, Hobbs G, et al. Correlation of intraocular pressure measured with Goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma. 2009;18:119-123.
17. Suzuki S, Suzuki Y, Iwase A, et al. Corneal thickness in an ophthalmologically normal Japanese population. Ophthalmol-ogy. 2005;112:1327-1336. (Pubitemid 41074619)
18. Kniestedt C, Lin S, Choe J, et al. Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1532-1537. (Pubitemid 41626689)
19. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;44: 367-408. (Pubitemid 30151145)
20. Jordao ML, Lupinacci AP, Ferreira EL, et al. Influence ofage, central corneal thickness, and quality score on dynamic contour tonometry. Eye. 2009;23:1364-1369.
21. Francis BA, Hsieh A, Lai MY, et al. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:20-26. (Pubitemid 46014299)
22. Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:746-751. (Pubitemid 38501466)
23. Paranhos A Jr, Paranhos FR, Prata JA Jr, et al. Influence of keratometric readings on comparative intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann, Tono-Pen, and non-contact tonometers. J Glaucoma. 2000;9:219-223. (Pubitemid 32429362)
24. Gunvant P, Baskaran M, Vijaya L, et al. Effect of corneal parameters on measurements using the pulsatile ocular blood flow tonograph and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:518-522. (Pubitemid 38437873)
25. Gunvant P, O'Leary DJ, Baskaran M, et al. Evaluation of tonometric correction factors. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:337-343. (Pubitemid 41383325)
26. Hoffmann EM, Grus FH, Pfeiffer N. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry. BMC Ophthalmol. 2004;4:4.
27. Grieshaber MC, Katamay R, Gugleta K, et al. Relationship between ocular pulse amplitude and systemic blood pressure measurements. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87:329-334.
28. Franklin SS, Gustin W IV, Wong ND, et al. Hemodynamic patterns of age-related changes in blood pressure: the Framinghamheartstudy. Circulation. 1997;96:308-315. (Pubitemid 27298437)
29. Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Detry MB, et al. Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2007;30:260-270.