Correlation of intraocular pressure measured with Goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 119-123

  Realini, Tony ^a   Weinreb, Robert N ^c   Hobbs, Gerald ^b  

^a West Virginia University Eye Institute   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Diurnal; Glaucoma; Intraocular pressure; Tonometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETRY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 67651091459     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31817d23c7     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:701-713.
2. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120:1268-1279. (Pubitemid 36105431)
3. Brandt JD. Corneal thickness in glaucoma screening, diagnosis, and management. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004;15:85-89. (Pubitemid 38457124)
4. Garway-Heath D, Kotecha A, Lerner F, et al. Measurement of intraocular pressure. In: Weinreb R, Brandt JD, Garway- Heath D, et al, eds. Intraocular Pressure. The Hague: Kugler Publications; 2007.
5. Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Robert YC. Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:344-350. (Pubitemid 41383326)
6. Doyle A, Lachkar Y. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma. 2005;14: 288-292. (Pubitemid 41023013)
7. Francis BA, Hsieh A, Lai MY, et al. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:20-26. (Pubitemid 46014299)
8. Grieshaber MC, Schoetzau A, Zawinka C, et al. Effect of central corneal thickness on dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:740-744. (Pubitemid 46919733)
9. Kamppeter BA, Jonas JB. Dynamic contour tonometry for intraocular pressure measurement. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 140:318-320. (Pubitemid 41125819)
10. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3118-3121. (Pubitemid 39121844)
11. Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, et al. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005; 89:1572-1575. (Pubitemid 41729900)
12. Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S, et al. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243: 763-767. (Pubitemid 41300416)
13. Punjabi OS, Ho HK, Kniestedt C, et al. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry. Curr Eye Res. 2006;31:851-862. (Pubitemid 44581308)
14. Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, et al. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85:272-279. (Pubitemid 46711364)
15. Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurementcomparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:2-6. (Pubitemid 43068411)
16. Kniestedt C, Lin S, Choe J, et al. Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1532-1537. (Pubitemid 41626689)
17. Ku JY, Danesh-Meyer HV, Craig JP, et al. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Eye. 2006;20:191-198.
18. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:658-665. (Pubitemid 46483675)
19. Barleon L, Hoffmann EM, Berres M, et al. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:583-590. (Pubitemid 44442067)
20. Hernandez MR, Ye H, Roy S. Collagen type IV gene expression in human optic nerve heads with primary open angle glaucoma. Exp Eye Res. 1994;59:41-51. (Pubitemid 24257143)