Influence of age, central corneal thickness, and quality score on dynamic contour tonometry

Eye

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1364-1369

  Jordo, M L S ^a,b,d   Pedroso De Carvalho Lupinacci, A ^a   Ferreira, E L ^a   Enomoto, I J F ^a   Costa, V P ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b Department of Ophthalmology   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^d Department of Ophthalmology ^*  (Brazil)

Author keywords

Age; Dynamic contour tonometry; Glaucoma; Goldmann; Pachimetry; Pascal

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CORNEA THICKNESS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETRY; FEMALE; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; SCORING SYSTEM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; CORNEA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67650660340     PISSN: 0950222X     EISSN: 14765454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2008.278     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Glaucoma Primário de Ângulo Aberto. I Consenso da Sociedade Brasileira de Glaucoma. BG Editora: Sao Paulo, 2001.
2. Weinreb RN, Khaw PT. Primary open-angle glaucoma. Lancet 2004; 363:1711-1720.
3. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31:146-155.
4. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Hussein M. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120:1268-1279.
5. Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Miller JP et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120:701-713; discussion 829-30.
6. Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, Gordon MO. Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Ophthalmology 2001; 108:1779-1788.
7. Morad Y, Sharon E, Hefetz L, Nemet P. Corneal thickness and curvature in normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 125:164-168.
8. Goldmann H, Schmidt T. [Applanation tonometry.]. Ophthalmologica 1957; 134(4):221-242.
9. Allingham RR, Damji KF, Freedman S, Moroi SE, Shafranov G, Shields MB. Shield's Textbook of Glaucoma, 5a ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004.
10. Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Robert YC. Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma 2005; 14:344-350.
11. Doyle A, Lachkar Y. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldman applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma 2005; 14:288-292.
12. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45:3118-3121.
13. Kniestedt C, Lin S, Choe J, Bostrom A, Nee M, Stamper RL. Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123:1532-1537.
14. Punjabi OS, Ho HK, Kniestedt C, Bostrom AG, Stamper RL, Lin SC. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry. Curr Eye Res 2006; 31(10): 851-862.
15. Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310.
16. Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Brusini P. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007; 85:272-279.
17. Ku JY, Danesh-Meyer HV, Craig JP, Gamble GD, McGhee CN. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Eye 2006; 20:191-198.
18. Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL. Dynamic contour tonometry: a comparative study on human cadaver eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122:1287-1293.
19. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 2000; 44:367-408.
20. Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S, Hamilton R, Dave D, Dua HS. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43:1389-1392.
21. Gunvant P, Baskaran M, Vijaya L, Joseph IS, Watkins RJ, Nallapothula M et al. Effect of corneal parameters on measurements using the pulsatile ocular blood flow tonograph and Goldamann applanation tonometer. Br J Ophthalmol 2004; 88:518-522.
22. Shah S, Chatterjee A, Mathai M, Kelly SP, Kwartz J, Henson D et al. Relationship between corneal thickness and measured intraocular pressure in general ophthalmology clinic. Ophthalmology 1999; 106:2154-2160.
23. Bron AM, Creuzot-Gauchert C, Goudeau-Boutillon S, d'Athis P. Falsely elevated intraocular pressure due to increased central corneal thickness. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1999; 237:220-224.
24. Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol 1997; 123(6):767- 772.
25. Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S, Funk J. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophtahlmol 2005; 243:763-767.
26. Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, Garway-Health DF. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89:1572-1575.
27. Friedenwald JS. Contribuition to the therapy and practice of tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1937; 20:985-1024.
28. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 1993; 38:1-30.