Source cancellation profiles of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography

NeuroImage

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 2464-2474

  Irimia, Andrei ^a   Van Horn, John Darrell ^a   Halgren, Eric ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancellation; Electroencephalography; Magnetoencephalography; Modeling; Neuroimaging

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN REGION; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NERVE STIMULATION; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SCALP; SIGNAL DETECTION; SKULL;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HEAD; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MODELS, ANATOMIC; SCALP; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SKULL;

EID: 84855436502     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.104     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ahlfors S.P., Han J., Belliveau J.W., Hamalainen M.S. Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation. Brain Topogr. 2010, 23:227-232.
2. Ahlfors S.P., Han J., Lin F.H., Witzel T., Belliveau J.W., Hamalainen M.S., Halgren E. Cancellation of EEG and MEG signals generated by extended and distributed sources. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2010, 31:140-149.
3. Akalin-Acar Z., Gencer N.G. An advanced boundary element method (BEM) implementation for the forward problem of electromagnetic source imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 2004, 49:5011-5028.
4. Akalin-Acar Z., Makeig S. Neuroelectromagnetic forward head modeling toolbox. J. Neurosci. Methods 2010, 190:258-270.
5. Anderson R.L., Bancroft T.A. Statistical Theory in Research 1952, McGraw-Hill, York, PA.
6. Chainay H., Krainik A., Tanguy M.L., Gerardin E., Le Bihan D., Lehericy S. Foot, face and hand representation in the human supplementary motor area. Neuroreport 2004, 15:765-769.
7. Clarke J., Braginski A.I. The SQUID Handbook: Fundamentals and Technology of SQUIDS and SQUID Systems 2004, Wiley-VCH.
8. Cuffin B.N. Effects of head shape on EEG's and MEG's. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1990, 37:44-52.
9. Dale A.M., Halgren E. Spatiotemporal mapping of brain activity by integration of multiple imaging modalities. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2001, 11:202-208.
10. Dale A.M., Fischl B., Sereno M.I. Cortical surface-based analysis-I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 1999, 9:179-194.
11. de Jongh A., de Munck J.C., Goncalves S.I., Ossenblok P. Differences in MEG/EEG epileptic spike yields explained by regional differences in signal-to-noise ratios. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2005, 22:153-158.
12. Destrieux C., Fischl B., Dale A., Halgren E. Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature. Neuroimage 2010, 53:1-15.
13. Dijkstra E. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik 1959, 1:269-271.
14. Fischl B., Sereno M.I., Dale A.M. Cortical surface-based analysis-II: inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage 1999, 9:195-207.
15. Fischl B., Sereno M.I., Tootell R.B.H., Dale A.M. High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1999, 8:272-284.
16. Fischl B., et al. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2004, 14:11-22.
17. Freeman W.J., Holmes M.D., Burke B.C., Vanhatalo S. Spatial spectra of scalp EEG and EMG from awake humans. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2003, 114:1053-1068.
18. Goldenholz D.M., Ahlfors S.P., Hamalainen M.S., Sharon D., Ishitobi M., Vaina L.M., Stufflebeam S.M. Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009, 30:1077-1086.
19. Grynszpan F., Geselowitz D.B. Model studies of magnetocardiogram. Biophys. J. 1973, 13:911-925.
20. Halgren E. How can intracranial recordings assist MEG source localization?. Neurol. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 2004:86.
21. Halgren E. Considerations in source estimation of the P3. Event-related Potentials in Patients with Epilepsy: from Current State to Future Prospects 2008, 71-88. John Libbey Eurotext, Eshery, Surrey, UK. A. Ikeda, Y. Inoue (Eds.).
22. Hamalainen M., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R.J., Knuutila J., Lounasmaa O.V. Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1993, 65:413-497.
23. Haueisen J., Ramon C., Czapski P., Eiselt M. On the influence of volume currents and extended sources on neuromagnetic fields-a simulation study. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 1995, 23:728-739.
24. Hillebrand A., Barnes G.R. A quantitative assessment of the sensitivity of whole-head MEG to activity in the adult human cortex. Neuroimage 2002, 16:638-650.
25. Hogg R., Tanis E.A. Probability and Statistical Inference 2001, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
26. Im C.H., An K.O., Jung H.K., Kwon H., Lee Y.H. Assessment criteria for MEG/EEG cortical patch tests. Phys. Med. Biol. 2003, 48:2561-2573.
27. Jasper H.H. The 10-20 electrode system of the International Federation. Handbook of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1974, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
28. Lachaux J.P., Rudrauf D., Kahane P. Intracranial EEG and human brain mapping. J. Physiol. Paris 2003, 97:613-628.
29. Leahy R.M., Mosher J.C., Spencer M.E., Huang M.X., Lewine J.D. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEC using a human skull phantom. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1998, 107:159-173.
30. Lin F.H., Ahlfors S.P., Witzel T., Dale A.M., Fischl B.R., Liu A.K., Belliveau J.W., Halgren E. Cancellation of MEG and EEG signals with distributed source activation on realistic cortical surface. Neuroimage 2001, 13:S186.
31. Lopez-Larson M.P., DelBello M.P., Zimmerman M.E., Schwiers M.L., Strakowski S.M. Regional prefrontal gray and white matter abnormalities in bipolar disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 2002, 52:93-100.
32. Lutkenhoner B. Dipole separability in a neuromagnetic source analysis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1998, 45:572-581.
33. Marinkovic K., Cox B., Reid K., Halgren E. Head position in the MEG helmet affects the sensitivity to anterior sources. Neurol. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 2004:30.
34. Meijs J.W.H., Bosch F.G.C., Peters M.J., Dasilva F.H.L. On the magnetic-field distribution generated by a dipolar current source situated in a realistically shaped compartment model of the head. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1987, 66:286-298.
35. Meijs J., Weier O., Peters M.J., van Oosterom A. On the numerical accuracy of the boundary element method. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1989, 36:1038-1049.
36. Melcher J.R., Cohen D. Dependence of the meg on dipole orientation in the rabbit head. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1988, 70:460-472.
37. Molins A., Stufflebeam S.M., Brown E.N., Hamalainen M.S. Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum l(2)-norm estimation. Neuroimage 2008, 42:1069-1077.
38. Mosher J.C., Leahy R.M., Lewis P.S. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse problems. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1999, 46:1069-1077.
39. Mugler J.P., Brookeman J.R. Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE). Magn. Reson. Med. 1990, 15:152-157.
40. Muller R.A., Rothermel R.D., Behen M.E., Muzik O., Mangner T.J., Chugani H.T. Receptive and expressive language activations for sentences: a PET study. Neuroreport 1997, 8:3767-3770.
41. Murakami S., Zhang T., Hirose A., Okada Y.C. Physiological origins of evoked magnetic fields and extra-cellular field potentials produced by guinea-pig CA3 hippocampal slices. J. Physiol. 2002, 544:237-251.
42. Murakami S., Hirose A., Okada Y.C. Contribution of ionic currents to magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) signals generated by guinea-pig CA3 slices. J. Physiol. 2003, 553:975-985.
43. Pascualmarqui R.D., Michel C.M., Lehmann D. Low-resolution electromagnetic tomography-a new method for localizing electrical-activity in the brain. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1994, 18:49-65.
44. Pugh K.R., Shaywitz B.A., Fulbright R.K., Byrd D., Skudlarski P., Katz L., Constable R.T., Fletcher J., Lacadie C., Marchione K., Gore J.C. Auditory selective attention: an fMRI investigation. Neuroimage 1996, 4:159-173.
45. Santi A., Servos P., Vatikiotis-Bateson E., Kuratate T., Munhall K. Perceiving biological motion: dissociating visible speech from walking. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2003, 15:800-809.
46. Seki Y., Kandori A. Two-dimensional gradiometer. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 46:3397-3401.
47. Sharon D., Hamalainen M.S., Tootell R.B.H., Halgren E., Belliveau J.W. The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex. Neuroimage 2007, 36:1225-1235.
48. Stok C.J., Meijs J.W.H., Peters M.J., Rutten W.L.C. Model evaluation using electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. Acta Otolaryngol. 1986, 102:5-10.
49. Szendi I., Kiss M., Racsmany M., Boda K., Cimmer C., Voros E., Kovacs Z.A., Szekeres G., Galsi G., Pleh C., Csernay L., Janka Z. Correlations between clinical symptoms, working memory functions and structural brain abnormalities in men with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 2006, 147:47-55.
50. Towle V.L., Khorasani L., Uftring S., Pelizzari C., Erickson R.K., Spire J.P., Hoffmann K., Chu D., Scherg M. Noninvasive identification of human central sulcus: a comparison of gyral morphology, functional MRI, dipole localization, and direct cortical mapping. Neuroimage 2003, 19:684-697.
51. Uzunbajakau S.A., Rijpma A.P., ter Brake H.J.M., Peters M.J. Optimization of a third-order gradiometer for operation in unshielded environments. IEEE Trans. Appl. Superconductivity 2005, 15:3879-3885.
52. Zhang Y.C., van Drongelen W., Kohrman M., He B. Three-dimensional brain current source reconstruction from intra-cranial ECoG recordings. Neuroimage 2008, 42:683-695.